2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Best Exhaust piping setups????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #1  
d_rotary_rocket_b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Exclamation Best Exhaust piping setups????

just wondering how the best setup for a dual exhaust would work?
for a straight pipe and no cats. how wide should the straight pipe be before it splits into the "Y", and then how wide should the pipes be after the "Y" split into the mufflers

my car right now is an 89 n/a with a cone intake that thats pretty much it

p.s. i know that a single muffler straight pipe is the best, but i love the look of the 2 mufflers on the *** of the rx
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 09:14 PM
  #2  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
true duals, 3", i would say
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 10:34 PM
  #3  
turbine's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
From: seattle wa
3 inch to 2 1/4 s
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #4  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by d_rotary_rocket_b
i know that a single muffler straight pipe is the best...
That's is not necessarily true. It depends entirely on pipe sizes.

A 2.5" main pipe is fine for a mildly modded NA. Splitting it into two 2.25" pipes will result in less restriction than a single 2.5" pipe.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 11:57 PM
  #5  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
If you have a 2.5" test pipe, I would say use a 2.5" single pipe that Y's off into two 2" pipes.

Originally Posted by gingenhagen
true duals, 3", i would say
Uhhh...no. I have 2" true duals and they flow way too much for my stock port supercharged engine. Considering that 2" true duals seem to be ideal for PERIPHERAL PORTED engines, I'd have to assume that 3" true duals would be way too much for an NA.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 12:01 AM
  #6  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
edit: nvm, i'm an idiot

Last edited by gingenhagen; Feb 2, 2005 at 12:08 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #7  
d_rotary_rocket_b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Canada
thanks for the feedback guys. what about the exhaust manifold, would it be way too much airflow if get rb headers or should i just use the stock exhaust manifold
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 11:26 AM
  #8  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
True duals.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2005 | 01:13 AM
  #9  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by d_rotary_rocket_b
...would it be way too much airflow...
No such thing. Airflow = power.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2005 | 01:17 AM
  #10  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
No such thing. Airflow = power.


you are a professor now?

more is not always better.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2005 | 02:31 AM
  #11  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
I see you're still way better at contributing smart-*** comments than useful info...

If airflow through an engine increases, its power output increases. If airflow decreases, power output decreases. This is fundamental engine stuff, no doctorate required. We even have a device that can do this for us. It's called a throttle.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2005 | 08:03 AM
  #12  
mack123's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: omaha
I have been looking into getting a 3 inch header that goes into a 2 1/4, then out to the mufflers, its a total setup front to back, and offered by one of the better rx-7 aftermarket places.

It would be for my turbo 2, in fact its designed for the turbo 2 and they claim.. about 50 hp gain. Whether or not it would be that much is open to debate, perhaps thats only at or above 7,000 rpm..

my question is.. If I installed this on my stock T2, would it adversely affect my idle quality, or would the computer be able to catch up and re-map itself easily for the added power?

I like a nice idle, I dont want a thumpety one.

More exhaust out would mean I would need more air in, so I would add a K and N filter or equal setup.. other than that the car is100 % stock, except for msd wires.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2005 | 08:09 AM
  #13  
mack123's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: omaha
they also said I need a fuel cut safety thing that plugged in somewhere because the added boost, created by the new open exhaust { they said boost would increase 3-4 } would tell the computer that boost was too great and shut off fuel,etc. a 50 gain sounds kinda unreal, i would think more like 30.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 03:54 PM
  #14  
d_rotary_rocket_b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by 1987RX7guy
True duals.
so how would you actually do that, don't headers actually go and merge to one outlet???
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #15  
BlaCkPlaGUE's Avatar
I live in an igloo
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: calgary alberta
Originally Posted by Karack
you are a professor now?

more is not always better.
lmao, smart assed kids...

We've talked about this before, and the more flow is not necessarily better. The principle of it is right, but with the seven theres an example or more restriction being better in a sense.

The collected header. When its collected (like we talked about before) the exhaust pulses from each rotor help pull one another through the pipe at the collection point. People have had more power with a collected header, than with a true dual exhaust. This has been what I've been told like 4 times now.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 04:25 PM
  #16  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Originally Posted by d_rotary_rocket_b
so how would you actually do that, don't headers actually go and merge to one outlet???

Racing Beat makes a "Road Race" header. Most people use them to make their custom long primary/short primary or true duals.

Racing Beat has their own Road Race exhaust. So does Mazdatrix. The latter I own but it is now more expensive than the RB so RB is more cost effective.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 04:33 PM
  #17  
totallimmortal's Avatar
Is that thing Turbo?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
I always though true dual was better but anyway what about true dual with an equalizer p;ip like an h or x pipe? would that be better then plain true dual?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 04:37 PM
  #18  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Originally Posted by totallimmortal
I always though true dual was better but anyway what about true dual with an equalizer p;ip like an h or x pipe? would that be better then plain true dual?


Theoretically its superior, but you have to know where to put in the collection(x-pipe) to make the best of it for your specific purpose. I've yet to see someone do a back to back tho. I told MS7 a few times he should do it but he hasn't to my knowledge.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #19  
totallimmortal's Avatar
Is that thing Turbo?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Where do you think the collection should be for a stock port s4? Many people say that true dual isn't needed for stock ports but i'm trying to max out my stock port NA before any major mods just to seen what it can do header and true dual i expect mid 14s i can't wait
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #20  
d_rotary_rocket_b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Canada
does anyone have pics of an h or x pipe thats been set up?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 12:35 PM
  #21  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Originally Posted by totallimmortal
Where do you think the collection should be for a stock port s4? Many people say that true dual isn't needed for stock ports but i'm trying to max out my stock port NA before any major mods just to seen what it can do header and true dual i expect mid 14s i can't wait
it all depends on what you want. from what i have read(not much) the collection point decides where the power is maximized by the scavenging. So you need to figure out where you are making your peak with the rest of your mods then do the calculations so that you can put the X pipe in the proper spot. Also I think the H pipe is kinda the ghetto way to do it. The X pipe I think is the better solution.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Monsterbox
Single Turbo RX-7's
22
Jul 29, 2022 10:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.