2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

anybody running H2O injection w/ stock IC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 11:16 PM
  #1  
rexman13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
good to be back
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 4
From: Kingsport, TN
anybody running H2O injection w/ stock IC?

does anybody have any experience with aquamist or any other water injection system? specifically, are you running water injection with the stock intercooler? and if you are, does if bring charge temps down low enough to justify buying it or to just go ahead and go through the hassle of installing a front mount intercooler? any feedback would be appreciated.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #2  
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 1
From: bay area
Check the 3rd gen forum for zerobanger's thread on water injection. Alot more 3rd gen people seem to be using it than 2nd gen people.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 11:53 PM
  #3  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Water injection is a complicated way of lowering air intake temps, and doesn't increase power like an upgraded intercooler does. Plus you don't have to keep refilling an intercooler.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 11:56 PM
  #4  
J-Rat's Avatar
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
CARX7 is running the Aquamist system on his FC, but he is using the Greddy V-spec too.

Jarrett
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 12:43 AM
  #5  
rexman13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
good to be back
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 4
From: Kingsport, TN
it's not all about making power. i want an engine to be reliable too. especially under higher than stock boost pressure.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 12:49 AM
  #6  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
I think what NZ is trying to say is that the stock IC isn't good enough at high PSI. Maybe it wasn't designed for it.


In any case my friend wankel7 was considering water injection with the stock IC. I told him to get a front mount. I would say go all out. FMIC and H2O injection. From what I have seen about cost from aquamist I would rather plunk down some change for a big front mounted IC.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 12:54 AM
  #7  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Texas (YeeHaw)
Has anyone seen that nitrous intercooler cooling system nitrous express put out? It's this piping that goes in front of the intercooler and gets pumped with nitrous to make the core cold. I think generally water injection and this is the same idea, what do you guys think about that system?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 01:55 AM
  #8  
rexman13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
good to be back
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 4
From: Kingsport, TN
i'd rather have water injection since water is relatively free and with the nitrous bar cooler you have to keep refilling the nitrous tank. and around here nitrous is about $3 per pound so each 10 lb bottle costs you $30.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 01:58 AM
  #9  
rexman13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
good to be back
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 4
From: Kingsport, TN
and about the making power comment, the water injection may not make more power but it allows you to run leaner fuel mixtures and more advanced timing safely, thus making more power. plus it keeps your internals clean, cutting down on carbon build up and hot spots that can also cause detonation.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 02:27 AM
  #10  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by rexman13b
i'd rather have water injection since water is relatively free and with the nitrous bar cooler you have to keep refilling the nitrous tank. and around here nitrous is about $3 per pound so each 10 lb bottle costs you $30.
But Nitrous oxide also comes out at -127 degrees fahrenheit.... water is ambient.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 02:46 AM
  #11  
badbu68's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Normal ILL
The point of water injection is not to condense or cool the air like nitrous or an intercooler. It's not to make power either. It's to prevent detonation.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 04:52 AM
  #12  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by 1987RX7guy
I think what NZ is trying to say is that the stock IC isn't good enough at high PSI.
Well I wasn't actually, but that is right.
Originally posted by rexman13b
the water injection may not make more power but it allows you to run leaner fuel mixtures and more advanced timing safely, thus making more power.
So does an upgraded intercooler, but water injection produces far less of a power increase, if any at all. This is because the water actually replaces the air, so there's less air to be combined with fuel for combustion. Water injection is for detonation supression, that's all.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 06:11 AM
  #13  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Very good info here.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 07:32 AM
  #14  
Faster Is Faster's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Finland
I had aquamist water injection with stock IC and it worked very well. Had about 250bhp at the time. Now I have aquamist and custom FMIC. Water injection gives only about 5 hp increase (300bhp at the moment) but next summer Ill get RB street port and To4B turbo so I believe aquamist gives alot more then. Water injection is good substitute for bigger IC and easy to install but if you are going for high hp figure (+300bhp) it is necessary to get bigger FMIC.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 09:12 AM
  #15  
RXTASY1's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: Right Here!
I'm running it on my 2nd. gen.
Running around 23 PSI with a FMIC and injecting around 400cc of H20\Methanol.
I have had good results with it.
http://www.teamfc3s.org/forum/showth...&threadid=9692
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #16  
carx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 3
From: Austin, Tx
If the questions is IC or H20 Injection, then I'd say IC since it requires less maintenance and is inherently more reliable since it is not mechanical in nature. However for those looking for top performance or reliability, then H20 injection is most definatley a good option.

We need to be clear in saying that yes, just adding H20 may not realize an improvement by itself if the engine tunning is left alone. However, H20 provides the ability to lean out the fuel mixture without increasing probability of detonation.

Ever ask yourself why rotaries run rich? The excess fuel is used to keep heat down inside the combustions chamber. Water does a much better job of cooling things down than does gasoline. Add some water remove more fuel. Leaning things out will make more power. Leave things the same, the intake charge is cooler and detonation is suppressed further.

Check out this site for the chemical reaction behind all this: It actually shows that H20 HELPS the combustion process specifically at higher RPM's... thus cleaning up emissions as well.
http://www.teknett.com/pwp/drmayf/injchem.htm

So you can add H20 and lean out your mixture to make more power at a given boost level with roughly equal realibily. Or you can add H20 leaving the tunnnig, cool the intake charge, and increase reliability.

Personaly, once I turn my system on (it's installed but not connected to power at this moment) I plan to turn up the boost with the tunning roughly the same. 'Cause running water into the engine for detonation suppression is much cheaper than buying 101 octane
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
May 27, 2017 04:51 AM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Aug 18, 2015 05:30 PM
RCCAZ 1
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
Aug 11, 2015 07:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.