2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Anybody had this ? S5 NA with Turbo Housing BUT not porting it.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-10, 10:09 AM
  #1  
PedoBear

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bye NYC. you SUCKED!
Posts: 1,429
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Anybody had this ? S5 NA with Turbo Housing BUT not porting it.

I searched but nothing like that comes up.

Question is same as title.

anybody have a S5 NA with Turbo Housing BUT not porting it (leave it as is)

Most of us know why we prefer Turbo Housing vs NA housing (that stupid wing/diffuser for noise suppression ... )

I know a lot of people Street Port their Turbo housing. but never seen anybody just "leave it as is"

Just kind of curious

thx
Old 07-17-10, 10:57 AM
  #2  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Both the NA and turbo housings are the same. The only real difference are the coolant passages to the LIM and the exhaust sleeves (which can be swapped). There isn't much of advantage in using turbo housings in an NA application.
Old 07-17-10, 12:42 PM
  #3  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
I think he's wondering how much of a difference there is just from removing the diffuser alone
Old 07-17-10, 02:50 PM
  #4  
Rotate or go home!

 
jazzmanbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: montreal
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been running this set up for about 5 years. I was having the engine rebuilt and ported on the inlet and it was suggested to me to use the turbo housings instead of attempting to port the exhaust ports.I wanted to use new housings and the cost difference was minimal like 80$ each. I'm using the high compression rotors and Racing beat headers into a high flow cat con. I find it noisy and raspy sounding (on OEM replacement mufflers) and looking to smooth things out sound-wise with a different muffler set-up. Just to busy to do it.
Old 07-17-10, 04:02 PM
  #5  
PedoBear

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bye NYC. you SUCKED!
Posts: 1,429
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by arghx
I think he's wondering how much of a difference there is just from removing the diffuser alone
yep


thx
Old 07-18-10, 01:30 PM
  #6  
i'll blow YOUR valve off

 
powrdby13B's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: KC MF MO
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you didn't get the jist of it from Aaron's post, the housings are the same down there. If you're talking about the diffuser that sits inside the exhaust port hole - the one that's nearly impossible to get out, JUST removing that won't do much.
From experience, you really won't see any gain without a free-flowing exhaust. Remember you're essentially porting the exhaust - making a big hole out of a small hole. Just like porting the intake, you won't get substantially more power without a host of other modifications. On an otherwise stock or "stock with bolt ons" car, expect a few hp. For the 7 minutes it takes to take it out, I would do it. Just look up how to do it right before you go cutting on things.
Old 07-18-10, 02:24 PM
  #7  
My job is to blow **** up

iTrader: (8)
 
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: palmyra Indiana
Posts: 2,900
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
on a rotary, i think it goes like this.. turbo'd, fast, and not super loud... pick 2.
if you want it fast, and not super loud, turbo it.
if you dont want to turbo it and don't want it super load, it's not gonna be fast(relativity)
if you don't want to turbo it, and you want it to be fast, its gonna be super loud.

This pretty much covers any kinda of port job you can do, as with n/a bridges and PP's only respond to free flowing exhaust. do some you tube searchs on bridge and pp N/a dyno's, show me a quite on with more then 250rwhp. do it.
Old 07-18-10, 04:15 PM
  #8  
PedoBear

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bye NYC. you SUCKED!
Posts: 1,429
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well, to be honest I probably gonna have someone to port the engine for me.

why not do it myself? cuz Im gonna buy brand new housing and Im too afraid that I might f-it-up

but I was thinking has anybody ever tried using Turbo housing on NA engine. thats all.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
08-14-15 10:26 PM



Quick Reply: Anybody had this ? S5 NA with Turbo Housing BUT not porting it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 AM.