2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

any one have the corksport autoexe member bars?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #1  
fast87t2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elder Wankle
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
From: new hampshire
any one have the corksport autoexe member bars?

i was thinkin of makeing myself a set of these crossmember, the front seems pretty easy but the picture for the rear is kinda hard to tell what goes where? does any one have these of maybe does anyone have a better pic??
any help would be great..

thanks

--joe
Attached Thumbnails any one have the corksport autoexe member bars?-2rx-suspension_misc_autoexe_member_bar_set.jpeg  
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 11:18 PM
  #2  
uptotibet's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
this seems like a good idea if you go through with it
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #3  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,480
Likes: 935
From: CA
I don't have a better pic online, but allow me to quote myself quoting myself...

Another member asked how the rear Auto-X brace works in '06 so I will quote my response to him.

Quote:
I am looking at an article about the FC Auto-X bar in RX-7 Magazine #016 from 2002.

The rear braces are 4 pieces all together (2 for each side) consisting of a short tubular brace and a large triangulated brace per side.

The large triangular brace mounts-

To the chassis at the bottom of the front subframe mount (the giant stud) and connects forward to the chassis floor (making one side of the triangle)

It mounts to the rear subframe at the "Y" pipe hanger mounts (making the 2 remaining sides). The piece angling from the frontmost of the chassis to chassis side to the subframe is a square tube the rest is reinforced plates.

The small tube braces-

From outward trailing arm pivot (the fixed pivot) inward to top of the floating trailing arm pivot. It is two plates the pivot bolts go through connected by a tube section.

The traingular braces would eliminate side to side and front to back movement of the subframe, but allow for the up and down movement (so sublink camber rod would work). There would definitely be some noise/vibration transmitted from subframe to chassis.

The tubular pieces reinforce the trailing arm pivots for more precise geometry and less binding.

I am very interested in trying the Auto-X braces myself!
BLUE TII is online now Report Post Reply With Quote
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 05:59 AM
  #4  
fast87t2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elder Wankle
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
From: new hampshire
thanks that actaully helped alot im gonna take pics of the entire proccess and keep everone posted.
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 11:55 AM
  #5  
red_s5_fc3s's Avatar
Red and Gold
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Sell them for a decent price and you've got something going!
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #6  
well uhhh's Avatar
I wanna go fast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: North Bend, WA
im pretty sure there was a thread similar to this a while ago...ok here https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/how-build-lower-arm-bar-under-%2415-448638/
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 02:34 PM
  #7  
fast87t2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elder Wankle
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
From: new hampshire
sorta but not really that only ties the a-arms toghter this bolts to the a-arms aqnd then to the frame much better geometry wise
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 11:40 AM
  #8  
uptotibet's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
personally i think the most important piece in this whole package is the rear subframe brace. if this brace can really assist in locking down the geometry of the rear, it could be a huge change in the handling characteristics of the fc.
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #9  
well uhhh's Avatar
I wanna go fast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: North Bend, WA
Originally Posted by fast87t2
sorta but not really that only ties the a-arms toghter this bolts to the a-arms aqnd then to the frame much better geometry wise
I know that... thats why i said similar. That doesn't mean you can't adapt what he did to work for you.
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #10  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Actually, if you think about the load paths, there's a direct path for the loads fore and aft (floorpan), but not a direct one across the transmission tunnel. Therefore the diagonal bracing of the Auto EXE brace is inefficient, as it's not bracing directly across the place where it's most needed. This loads the bar under bending where it's much less stiff than if its loaded under compression and tension, like mine. Now having those diagonals in addition to the bar straight across couldn't hurt other than for the slight weight addition, but I believe that bracing it straight across is the better way to go if you had to choose between the two, besides, it's WAAAAAAAAY cheaper to do it my way.

Now the Auto EXE front brace might help the torsional stiffness of the car a bit, but it's not the best way to brace the suspension IMHO.
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #11  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,480
Likes: 935
From: CA
The Auto-x diagonal braces in front and pieces of the rear do something that your straight across front brace does not.

Ties the subframe structures into the unibody.

Which may not be legal in some classes of racing....
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #12  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
But the subframe is bolted to the car, so that'll give it a load path for the fore and aft loading right into the floor pan, so a bar straight across provides the most direct load path across the weakest part. I'm not trying to say that those braces are bad or that they don't do anything, I'm just saying that they're maybe not as good as one might think because there's no direct load path between the two suspension arms. If I had one of those, I'd have an addition bar welded in across the front.
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #13  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,480
Likes: 935
From: CA
Think also of the vector of the load you are trying to compensate for.

If you put the car on a rack, turn the wheels and imagine a line from the contact patch perpendicular to the direction of vehicular travel.

Now create a brace that will stress the bar along its length while having that force acting upon it and it will look like the Auto-x bar.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.