2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

AFM mounted after turbo, but b4 TB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #1  
Smoken''s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 2
From: Andrews TX
AFM mounted after turbo, but b4 TB

I was wondering if anybody had ever done this to an Rx7. A buddy of mine has an older 300 with his AFM mounted inline to the front mount. Does anybody know if this gives you any kind of advantages?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 07:47 PM
  #2  
1SxyRXy's Avatar
my fc broke
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 0
From: rohnert park,CA/ bay area
i see it in japneeese magazines all the time
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #3  
Curtisleeyoung's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Pomona CA
I don't know about advantages, but it for a RX-7 setup it would be problem matic. When the TB closes and the pressure in the intercooler piping is released there is a pressure wave created. The could affect how the AFM closes.

On his 300 the AFM might be of the heated wire type, where the air flow is calculated by the change in temp accros the heated wire. For 2nd gen 7's the AFM is a trap door type where a Flap is opened relitive to the air flow comming in.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #4  
DylanShupe's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: Kingsport, TN
There was a post about this not long ago...You should search for it.

If I remember correctly though, it doesn't show any significant, if any, power gains. It's still a flap-style mass air sensor, so it's not going to free up any air anywhere you put it.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 08:33 PM
  #5  
Digi7ech's Avatar
I break Diff mounts
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 4
From: Avondale, Arizona
Originally Posted by Curtisleeyoung
I don't know about advantages, but it for a RX-7 setup it would be problem matic. When the TB closes and the pressure in the intercooler piping is released there is a pressure wave created. The could affect how the AFM closes.

On his 300 the AFM might be of the heated wire type, where the air flow is calculated by the change in temp accros the heated wire. For 2nd gen 7's the AFM is a trap door type where a Flap is opened relitive to the air flow comming in.

Well. As long as the BOV is after the AFM(meaning in between throttle plates and AFM) then it should be ok because the BOV will remove that pressure wave.

It may be there but probably smaller.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 08:45 PM
  #6  
JJ01769's Avatar
Lovin The Spinnin Doritos
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Yeah being a flap style it wont do much just give you bad readings from the flap being constantly open under boost(much easier to force the flap open than to suck it open) not to mention a boost restriction. on 3000gt vr4's and dsms you can do this its called blow-thru metering you have to use a gm style air meter and a signal converter. I dont know how hard it would be to make the signal converter for the 7's air meter though.

Last edited by JJ01769; Jun 9, 2005 at 08:47 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 08:53 PM
  #7  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
FYI the early 300 Z's do have the wire style AFM or whatever that style is called. I would assume the later ones do also. Interesting idea, but what purpose or advantage would it serve?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 01:50 AM
  #8  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
Easier to blow it open than suck it open and therefore the flap will always be open and give bad readings? You've got to be kidding me! If the engine is running, it's always open. Airflow is airflow and the exact same amount of air is always going through it. Having said that however, the amount of space that air takes up is different before vs after the turbo. A boost restriction??? Remember that a turbo slows down the air in order to compress it. It can't compress it if it doesn't slow it down. When the air is compressed, it takes up less physical space. If it takes up less space, you can get more through any passages that it travels through with the same amount of restriction. Translated to the afm location, this would mean that it is actually less of a restriction after the turbo than it is before the turbo since the air going through it is now compressed to take up less space. If it is a boost restriction after the turbo, it is a much bigger nonboost restriction before it. Do not place the afm before the intercooler though. It must go after it. Lots of people have run them after the turbo with very good results. Of course the best thing is to not have the need for one at all but after the turbo works just fine.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 07:36 AM
  #9  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...converting+afm

read that.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 01:08 PM
  #10  
slpin's Avatar
7th Heaven
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 4
From: California
pushing air and pulling them are a little different
this is probably why you keep saying it is opening all the way
because you are using it wrong
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 07:30 PM
  #11  
mr_vaughn's Avatar
Chillin
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 5
From: LA,CA
i want to do this to my rx7 since i have a greddy FMIC and having a hesitation issue even after much troubleshooting.

note that you can only move the AFM of a S5 and NOT a S4 since the S4 have a flap type AFM.

i have not thought about the BOV position but
i would keep it between the turbo and the intercooler.
i want my AFm between the IC and the Throttle body.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #12  
HHTurboVert's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Rancho Cucamonga Ca,
It has already been asked, but I don't see a clear answer. What are the advantages of a blow through system? I have seen a write up on how to wire the S5 AFM in an S4. If the S5 AFM can be run blow- through then would this be worth doing?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #13  
skir2222's Avatar
I win
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 2
From: NJ
well think about it... you could mount your intake right at the turbo. wouldn't there be a advantage to that?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 10:57 PM
  #14  
cardzrule's Avatar
Nebulon
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: USA


https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/afm-after-turbo-178739/

Last edited by cardzrule; Jun 25, 2005 at 11:01 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 01:52 AM
  #15  
TurboSE's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: SF CALI
Originally Posted by mr_vaughn
i want to do this to my rx7 since i have a greddy FMIC and having a hesitation issue even after much troubleshooting.

note that you can only move the AFM of a S5 and NOT a S4 since the S4 have a flap type AFM.

i have not thought about the BOV position but
i would keep it between the turbo and the intercooler.
i want my AFm between the IC and the Throttle body.
Hmmm I thought it was OK to Use the flapper Type as long as it's mounted FLAT w/ the black silicone sealed side facing UP!
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #16  
mr_vaughn's Avatar
Chillin
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 5
From: LA,CA
i would run 2 BOV if i used flap type cause the flap would shut as you let off the throttle.

1 BOV between AFM and Throttle body
and after the turbo before the IC.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #17  
HHTurboVert's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Rancho Cucamonga Ca,
If the S5 AFM was used, wouldn't I be able to vent my BOV w/out the idling issues it usually causes? I was thinking I could put the AFM between the BOV and the throttle body, that way if the BOV leaks at idle it would have no effect.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #18  
mr_vaughn's Avatar
Chillin
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 5
From: LA,CA
true

Originally Posted by HHTurboVert
If the S5 AFM was used, wouldn't I be able to vent my BOV w/out the idling issues it usually causes? I was thinking I could put the AFM between the BOV and the throttle body, that way if the BOV leaks at idle it would have no effect.
i would believe that would be true...
but if you should not have idle issues because of your BOV.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 PM.