2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

89 N/a Injector Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 08:22 PM
  #1  
BLK_KNIGHT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: fayetteville, nc
Question 89 N/a Injector Question

I have a 89 n/a and i want to run bigger injectors. Not really too big just like some 89-91 TURBO II injectors in the primary spots and im thinking of 720's in the seconds. Is this a good setup to do without any complicatios.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 03:16 AM
  #2  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by BLK_KNIGHT
...i want to run bigger injectors.
Do you need to run bigger injectors or do you just want to? The stock NA injectors are sufficient for ~250hp, which you won't get without a bridgeport. Unless you're planning one, there is absolutely no need for you to run bigger injectors.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 03:39 AM
  #3  
13bpower's Avatar
s4 for life
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 1
From: Oahu
Your car will run poorly, get horrible gas milage and have less power.

Your money would be better spent on a S-AFC and dynotune. By using this to put LESS fuel into your engine your car will run better, get better gas milage and have significant performance gains.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 07:12 AM
  #4  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by BLK_KNIGHT
I have a 89 n/a and i want to run bigger injectors. Not really too big just like some 89-91 TURBO II injectors in the primary spots and im thinking of 720's in the seconds. Is this a good setup to do without any complicatios.
Can you tell us why you want to do this?


-Ted
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 10:17 AM
  #5  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Also read the FAQ.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2004 | 06:08 PM
  #6  
BLK_KNIGHT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: fayetteville, nc
the reason I was askin is, I was planning on hookin up a nitrous system and i wanted to know if this would be the right thing to do, meaning you have to have the fuel to keep it from leaning out right?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2004 | 06:41 PM
  #7  
mcnannay's Avatar
Lean Mean Speed Thingie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, ID
depends, are you going to run a wet or dry nitrous setup? A wet system if done well will not require any extra fuel from the injectors. It has its own injector for fuel that you'll need to supply pressurized fuel to. the dry setup however will require you to add more fuel with the injectors
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2004 | 09:52 PM
  #8  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by BLK_KNIGHT
the reason I was askin is, I was planning on hookin up a nitrous system and i wanted to know if this would be the right thing to do, meaning you have to have the fuel to keep it from leaning out right?
Get a "wet" set-up with fuel and NOS jets.
This way you don't have to mess with the stock fuel injectors.


-Ted
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2004 | 10:08 PM
  #9  
inflatablepets's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: St Louis
I see no reason why you should change the injectors.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hotshot2014
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
Jul 18, 2017 02:30 PM
morataya
Microtech
1
Aug 16, 2015 09:39 AM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Aug 15, 2015 01:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.