2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

6 port turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #26  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Yeah, what he said. If you already have a 4 port block, then use it.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #27  
Kooneon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Learning da ropes
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley
so you are suggesting that i use the current ex manifold and port match the s4 int manifold and not be able to use the aux ports?! what kinda bottom end response will this yeild me.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #28  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
I don't know if I've suggested anything...

Wait, I suggested you use the 4 port block that you already have.

If you want a suggestion, I suggest you make a totally custom turbo manifold to move the turbo out of the way of the aux ports. That way you can keep them functional.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 07:23 PM
  #29  
Kooneon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Learning da ropes
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley
and if i do that, then i am going to have to cut into the fender well, correct?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 12:38 AM
  #30  
FC-Dan's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Make a top mount. That would be crazy. And in my opinion, awesome.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 06:35 AM
  #31  
russianmob's Avatar
rice killa
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
just checked out japan2la manifold and from my understanding, on top of the lim, i will need uim, tb, turbo cable and turbo wire harness for throttle body sensors? what about fuel rails, are n/a rails efficient?

seems to me like a bunch of headache, might as well get a custom turbo manifold so it clears the na lim and slap a t04b on that bitch .... but then messing with custom downpipe and tryin to match it to the rest of my RB stuff is something i dont want....

i am looking for as less headache as possible..... aaron, were you making a "turbo kit" for n/a guys? or its a rumor i heard on these forums.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #32  
npena80's Avatar
n00btastic
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Houston
is there a performance advantage to turboing an NA vs a T2?
what advantage would have 5/6th ports on a turbo add?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 09:56 PM
  #33  
Black13B's Avatar
In Full Autist Cosplay
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Extended port timing
Higher Compression
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 10:23 PM
  #34  
RandomHero's Avatar
Hopeless Rotorhead
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 590
Likes: 1
From: N. Houston, TX
Boost > compression

You won't be able to run nearly as much boost on a 9.7:1 engine that you would on a turbo engine with lower compression. The ports are obviously different as well, but thats going out of the area of my expertise.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 10:47 PM
  #35  
npena80's Avatar
n00btastic
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Houston
okay, but 6 ports = more flow than 4 rite?

wouldnt that also mean more power as well?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2009 | 03:51 PM
  #36  
Kooneon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Learning da ropes
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley
sorry, for being out of the loop for a while. I got my hands on a 1991 coupe and am in the process of swapping my suspension and radiator and what nots. I got a plan for truboing this thing and i will let you guys know when im done or have any questions.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2009 | 08:21 PM
  #37  
need-a-t2's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 540
From: binghamton, ny
http://forum.teamfc3s.org/showthread.php?t=37694
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 06:07 PM
  #38  
SpikeDerailed's Avatar
This sh*t burns oil!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 5
From: Charlotte, NC - USA
What about the fuel rails. Can you just throw the 550cc injectors in the NA rails with N/A FPR or do you need a different pressure regulator?
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 09:37 AM
  #39  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
You know, that's actually a very good question.

The injectors do fit, but I have never measured the stock NA FPR rise with boost. Now that said, I have use the FPR under boost before and didn't have any issues.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #40  
R/co S/dewayzz's Avatar
Dorito Drifto
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Queens, New York
all in all though, is it cheaper to do a 6 Port turbo? cause i myself is stuck between a T2 and 6P
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 02:21 PM
  #41  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Almost every is better off doing a TII swap instead of a turbo 6 port from a number of different standpoints. As for cost, each one depends on where you get your parts and how you handle the labour.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 08:20 PM
  #42  
Daeldalus's Avatar
な*ぜ*あ*な*た*は*こ*れ*を*翻*訳*し*ま*し*た*か*?*
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Cross S.C.
ok im just trying to get some info down on all this but here it goes.

i have a blown TII engine with all accessories and a perfect turbo. the engine is mixing water and oil on a massive scale and sat unused for 13 years.

I am trying to make my very slow N/A faster but i have a very small amount of cash how would the TII swap come out better for me? it would cost me at least 1400-1500 to get the TII rebuilt and a tII to na driveshaft is like another 300 so that is 1800 that i would not spend on the na turbo build and i do not plan to go past 6psi on boost so i dont think reliability would be too big of an issue. i have the tools and the people to make custom lines and get custom fittings with no problems and i already planned on getting a new exhaust and a fuel comp so would even in my case the tII swap be better??
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 10:00 PM
  #43  
NoPistons!'s Avatar
Tango Down
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 3
From: SC/NC
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Almost every is better off doing a TII swap instead of a turbo 6 port from a number of different standpoints. As for cost, each one depends on where you get your parts and how you handle the labour.
Aaron, i dont know why but i always tend to assume people tackling this can run wires, weld, run a dremel/grinder/tap and can source stuff.


And yeah, +1 for TII swap. Why?

Because ALL the parts you'd probably end up getting (if you're in a hurry and want stock stuff) are included in your swap kit from anywhere from $800-1400 shipped to your front door.

Now, if you have ALOT of money into your six port motor (i know i do) then it becomes practical from a financial standpoint.


It is **** easy though. And you can also source your turbo coolant from your bac lines. You can get an oil filter sandwich plate and a bulkhead fitting for the oil duties.

Aftermarket boost gauge and wideband SHOULD be purchased but aren't needed.

FCD is definately needed. Why? Fuel cut is SATAN.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
hotshot2014
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
Jul 18, 2017 02:30 PM
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Aug 14, 2015 10:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.