View Poll Results: 3RD gear TOP MPH
70-75MPH



3
3.13%
80-85MPH



18
18.75%
90-100MPH



51
53.13%
100-120MPH



24
25.00%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll
3RD Gear Top MPH
3RD Gear Top MPH
What MPH are some of you getting in third gear
Today I did a little test
Punched it from a second gear roll
@35 MPH
and I hit 112MPH at 7200+RPM in 3RD Gear
and most likely could of revved upto 9K If I wanted
maybe got even more MPH
I'll find out this wendsday
when I take my car to the track for the 1st time
after the MicroTech install and new Upgrades
Today I did a little test
Punched it from a second gear roll
@35 MPH
and I hit 112MPH at 7200+RPM in 3RD Gear
and most likely could of revved upto 9K If I wanted
maybe got even more MPH
I'll find out this wendsday
when I take my car to the track for the 1st time
after the MicroTech install and new Upgrades
Last edited by kabooski; Sep 1, 2003 at 08:58 PM.
Gearing-based formulas (do not take into account other factors like horsepower required, drag, wind, road grade, tire traction, speed governors, etc.):
Speed in mph = (Rear tire circumference in inches * engine rpm) / (Transmisison gear ratio * Differential ratio * 1056)
If you don't want to bother jacking up your car and measuring your tire, this formula will be fairly close, although manufacturing tolerances vary in the tire industry:
Circumference in inches = pi * (Wheel diameter + (2 * (Aspect ratio * Tread width in millimeters / 254)))
For example, given a 205/60 R15:
Wheel diameter = 15 in
Aspect ratio = 60
Tread width = 205 mm
Calculated circumference = 77.55 in
Speed in mph = (Rear tire circumference in inches * engine rpm) / (Transmisison gear ratio * Differential ratio * 1056)
If you don't want to bother jacking up your car and measuring your tire, this formula will be fairly close, although manufacturing tolerances vary in the tire industry:
Circumference in inches = pi * (Wheel diameter + (2 * (Aspect ratio * Tread width in millimeters / 254)))
For example, given a 205/60 R15:
Wheel diameter = 15 in
Aspect ratio = 60
Tread width = 205 mm
Calculated circumference = 77.55 in
hmm
well I have 255/50/16's in the back
front are factory stock spec's
4.10 rear
stock 87 TII tranny
The real test should come this coming wendsday- If I can maintain 110+ MPH down the 1/4
which should put me in the 12's no?
well I have 255/50/16's in the back
front are factory stock spec's
4.10 rear
stock 87 TII tranny
The real test should come this coming wendsday- If I can maintain 110+ MPH down the 1/4
which should put me in the 12's no?
Last edited by kabooski; Sep 1, 2003 at 09:30 PM.
since your tires are bigger then stock your speedo isn't right anyways. and you'll be able to go faster in 3rd then stock cars at the same rpm. and you'll be going faster then your speedo says.
Im pretty sure in my N/A at 7000rpm in 3rd, Im at about ~95MPH. Thats just off the top of my head, Ill try it out tomorrow and get back with a more accurate reading. This is with stock wheel/tire size.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by kabooski
well I have 255/50/16's in the back
front are factory stock spec's
4.10 rear
stock 87 TII tranny
well I have 255/50/16's in the back
front are factory stock spec's
4.10 rear
stock 87 TII tranny
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
Circumference in inches = pi * (Wheel diameter + (2 * (Aspect ratio * Tread width in millimeters / 254)))
Circumference in inches = pi * (Wheel diameter + (2 * (Aspect ratio * Tread width in millimeters / 254)))
Circumference in inches = pi * (Wheel diameter + (2 * (Aspect ratio * Tread width in millimeters / 25.4)))
Also, for those who don't know the deal with aspect ratios, they are a decimal (like percentages). For example, you would enter 0.60 into the equation for an aspect ratio of 60.
Sorry for the confusion.
Originally posted by RylAssassin
Arent there other factors that have somthing to do with getting to 110+mph down a 1/4 mile strip??
Arent there other factors that have somthing to do with getting to 110+mph down a 1/4 mile strip??
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/4601/hpcalc.html
http://robrobinette.com/et.htm
Originally posted by $150FC
why is this a poll? it's a mathematical equation :/
why is this a poll? it's a mathematical equation :/
What the hell kind of escort do you have? I drive a '95 LX daily, and in 1st at redline Im doing about 30.....2nd cant be much more than 50..
Anyways, Im about to go do a little "test run" in my FC and see how fast I am going at 7000RPM in 3rd, and maybe 4th
Anyways, Im about to go do a little "test run" in my FC and see how fast I am going at 7000RPM in 3rd, and maybe 4th
I get around 90-95 in third with stock sized 15's I think its 205's on vert wheels. I usually don't use third like that but I know since I redline once a day heading home.
OK, just got back from a little test run. I hit about 95MPH at 7k in 3rd. This is with 205/60r15 (stock size) Im at about 115 at 5k in 4th....but I ran out of "safe" road to try any faster.
Originally posted by Rxmfn7
OK, just got back from a little test run. I hit about 95MPH at 7k in 3rd. This is with 205/60r15 (stock size) Im at about 115 at 5k in 4th....but I ran out of "safe" road to try any faster.
OK, just got back from a little test run. I hit about 95MPH at 7k in 3rd. This is with 205/60r15 (stock size) Im at about 115 at 5k in 4th....but I ran out of "safe" road to try any faster.
Hey Thats Pretty good! 3RD Gear pull for a N/A
Note:
can a MOD alter the Poll for me
I should of made the last option 101-120
plz change it if you can
Thanks
Last edited by kabooski; Sep 2, 2003 at 02:38 PM.
Originally posted by Kabooski
Well wouldn't you know it looks like it may rain tommarow
So there maybe no track day
Which Sucks!
I'm dying to try out my car at the track
Well wouldn't you know it looks like it may rain tommarow
So there maybe no track day
Which Sucks!
I'm dying to try out my car at the track
Damn.... that means I did all those 110+ MPH runs for you for nothing..

in my s5 i hit 102mph in 3rd at 8k going uphill
. i'll actually check today on my way home if there is no traffic, and let you all know... Something in my head is telling me i hit 112mph before in 3rd... we shall see. this is on the stock 15's and tyre size.
. i'll actually check today on my way home if there is no traffic, and let you all know... Something in my head is telling me i hit 112mph before in 3rd... we shall see. this is on the stock 15's and tyre size.
Last edited by DoingAnything; Sep 3, 2003 at 04:58 PM.
Cruising in 5th at 55 -- drop directly to 3rd: & go..
3MB Video
The Speedometer shows 110.
Actual speed (Via GPS) = 101.
Hmm - 17 seconds to get to 100 - The dark side beckons..
3MB Video
The Speedometer shows 110.
Actual speed (Via GPS) = 101.
Hmm - 17 seconds to get to 100 - The dark side beckons..
Last edited by SureShot; Sep 3, 2003 at 05:12 PM.
Ok here it is, I finnaly made it to the track yay! no rain
Best time was a 12.60@111.87(bit of slippage in clutch in 2ND and 3RD)
pulled all the way thru 3RD gear at 8K+
Never hit 4RTH
Check the MicroTech section for a full Timeslip
Best time was a 12.60@111.87(bit of slippage in clutch in 2ND and 3RD)
pulled all the way thru 3RD gear at 8K+
Never hit 4RTH
Check the MicroTech section for a full Timeslip
thats on a different turbo then stock, right?
i was under the impression that the t-18 chokes, so in the 1/4 you wanna drop to 4th at some point because at 7k its not doing anything for you anyway
opinions? i'm curious as to what i should be shifting at during my 1/4
i was under the impression that the t-18 chokes, so in the 1/4 you wanna drop to 4th at some point because at 7k its not doing anything for you anyway
opinions? i'm curious as to what i should be shifting at during my 1/4
Yea I have a Big T4 turbo running 14PSI
which could be a reason for the 3RD gear pulls
or maybe the weak clutch?
Well see this weekend I'm getting a ACT clutch installled
have right now a Stock Pressure plate with a Kevlar Disk
which could be a reason for the 3RD gear pulls
or maybe the weak clutch?
Well see this weekend I'm getting a ACT clutch installled
have right now a Stock Pressure plate with a Kevlar Disk
Last edited by kabooski; Sep 11, 2003 at 06:58 PM.

