2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

3" verse 2.5" lag

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-06, 12:26 AM
  #1  
yes,thats me \/

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
cdaleracer669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Eaton, CO
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3" verse 2.5" lag

i want to go FMIC. in the future (year or so) i want to upgrade turbo and shoot for 400-450 rwhp. how much of a difference will i notice with 3" verses 2.5" piping on stock turbo? if its a huge difference ill just go 2.5 now and upgrade everything to 3 when i go to a big turbo. if its not THAT big of a difference ill just go 3 " now and bear with it for a year. what are the downfalls of the 3" compared to 2.5" with stock turbo? ive been reading and searching for an hour, and havent found my complete answer.

increase in lag...how many RPM higher? (medium streetport, FULL straight exhaust)
anything else?
Old 11-28-06, 12:30 AM
  #2  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
The biggest thing you need to worry about is boost creep. I've got an s5 turbo with 3 inch downpipe and some kind of ported wastegate (I didn't do it and I haven't looked at how extensively it was ported) and I will still spike 14psi in higher gears and that's runnning with no boost controller.

If you run the bigger downpipe, make sure you've got a solid wastegate port.
Old 11-28-06, 11:02 AM
  #3  
yes,thats me \/

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
cdaleracer669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Eaton, CO
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was talking about 3" intercooler piping. i have a haltech so no worries about creeping, as i will be running 12 psi most of the time and it will be tuned for about 15 to whatever it bleeds off to.
Old 11-28-06, 11:05 AM
  #4  
Respecognize!

 
Whizbang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Anchor Bay, CA
Posts: 4,106
Received 71 Likes on 42 Posts
short answer.

2.5". you wont be needing 3". period.

the stock piping is just under 2" IIRC. The volumetrics of the 3" piping is not a good idea unless your talking something in the T88 range. And even then there is some fluid flow characteristics to consider.
Old 11-28-06, 01:14 PM
  #5  
Semper

iTrader: (3)
 
rx7 FC TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^i agree i have 2.5" and that seems to be fine.
Old 11-28-06, 04:04 PM
  #6  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
Originally Posted by cdaleracer669
i was talking about 3" intercooler piping. i have a haltech so no worries about creeping, as i will be running 12 psi most of the time and it will be tuned for about 15 to whatever it bleeds off to.
on a stock turbo, you will be running whatever boost your wastegate will let you run. There's a reason why people do monster ports on the wastegates, remember that.
Old 11-28-06, 10:24 PM
  #7  
yes,thats me \/

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
cdaleracer669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Eaton, CO
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks guys! i was probably going to go with aspec gt35r (t4) kit
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
164
03-08-20 08:00 PM
heywier427
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
2
09-11-15 04:49 PM
Tem120
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-07-15 09:53 AM
apooch
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
09-04-15 10:27 AM



Quick Reply: 3" verse 2.5" lag



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.