160 mph
#2
160mph ? As in 260kph ? Thats just a catback + filter + donwpipe in a TII I'm halfway there (filter + catback, just need the downpipe)....
My best top speed as of today is 238-240kph, but that is BEFORE the new catback (which was clogged to hell and back -twice )....Friend of mine with no cats and cone filter reached 250kph going -very- slightly uphill and still had room/power to accelerate...
Really dont see any problem for any turbo FC reaching 260kph....reaching 300kph, now THAT'S a different story....
My best top speed as of today is 238-240kph, but that is BEFORE the new catback (which was clogged to hell and back -twice )....Friend of mine with no cats and cone filter reached 250kph going -very- slightly uphill and still had room/power to accelerate...
Really dont see any problem for any turbo FC reaching 260kph....reaching 300kph, now THAT'S a different story....
#4
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Based on the 200hp S5 Turbo's 135mph top speed, to reach 160mph (156km/h) you need 333hp. To get 300km/h (188mph) you'd need 536hp and taller gearing.
Based on the 200hp S5 Turbo's 135mph top speed, to reach 160mph (156km/h) you need 333hp. To get 300km/h (188mph) you'd need 536hp and taller gearing.
And the S5's top speed is 135+ mph, which means it varies with the specific HP output....
Anyway, I have seen 240kph with clogged exhaust and stock filter, so I guess 250kph (on speedo) is now doable, and 260kph is not too far fetched with DP...
#5
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by The Ace
You're talking actual mph or readings on speedo ?
You're talking actual mph or readings on speedo ?
And the S5's top speed is 135+ mph, which means it varies with the specific HP output...
BTW, I should have mentioned in my previous post that an FC would probably take flight before it reached 300km/h! More downforce would be required for safety, so you'd need even more power to overcome the drag that'd cause. 600hp oughta do it...
Last edited by NZConvertible; 07-01-02 at 06:08 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Naha-City, Okinawa, JP
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
in 1986 racing beat made a 2nd gen that went 238mph (400ish kph) then in 1995 they got a 3rd gen to 241mph. these cars were very heavily modified, but for a closer to stock car 160mph is probbably doable.
#7
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Not sure what you mean by that. Magazine articles I've seen quote the stock top speed as 216km/h or 235mph. Top speed only changes if power changes...
BTW, I should have mentioned in my previous post that an FC would probably take flight before it reached 300km/h! More downforce would be required for safety, so you'd need even more power to overcome the drag that'd cause. 600hp oughta do it...
Not sure what you mean by that. Magazine articles I've seen quote the stock top speed as 216km/h or 235mph. Top speed only changes if power changes...
BTW, I should have mentioned in my previous post that an FC would probably take flight before it reached 300km/h! More downforce would be required for safety, so you'd need even more power to overcome the drag that'd cause. 600hp oughta do it...
Trending Topics
#8
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Philly, Pa.
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Top speed only changes if power changes...
Top speed only changes if power changes...
(sorry, just being nit-picky :p)
#10
Originally posted by SureShot
Yeah, there is an awesome video of what happens at over 200MPH when the nose gets light. Anyone got it?
Yeah, there is an awesome video of what happens at over 200MPH when the nose gets light. Anyone got it?
#11
SCCA Rookie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
since the air is the thing slowing you down at those speeds, I would guess that proper aerodynamics would benefit you more at higher speeds than slight increases in power.
#12
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Roll up the windows, put down the headlights sunroof & antenna, turn off all accessories, head downwind & downhill.
Of course you could just drive off a cliff. I expect Thelma & Louise made over 170MPH.
Of course you could just drive off a cliff. I expect Thelma & Louise made over 170MPH.
#14
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: West Los Angeles
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I made 151 with just with adding the racing beat exhaust. And I was at about 6300 rpm when I saw the end of the road coming up quick. I suspect I could get at least 155 by 8000rpm if not a little more. So it shouldn't be too hard to get to 160
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: AZ/ Chi-Town
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
**** i also have a damn Saturn and it can pin and hold a steady 130mph with like no trouble
i would like to think a nice 7 could do 160 fairly easy
my 7 freezes at 100 ?????
i would like to think a nice 7 could do 160 fairly easy
my 7 freezes at 100 ?????
#16
Remember, our cars are 12-16 years old and *most* cars back then would be making miracles to hit 140...
Yes, nowadays a saturn will hold 130 and a Jeep *might* be able to take a N/A in a stargiht line.... cars have just gotten *better.*
Yes, nowadays a saturn will hold 130 and a Jeep *might* be able to take a N/A in a stargiht line.... cars have just gotten *better.*
#17
I your N/A is running right it will easily do 120+ It would also have no problem beating a Jeep in a straight line. My girlfriend has a 95 wrangler, and it cant even come close to my 88 vert.
#18
Oh, I have NO problem hitting 120. She still pulls hard at 121+. And I have no problem smoking a mid 90s 4.6L stang... let alone a jeep.
I'm just saying that a 86 base with clogged cats or tired engine and slipping clutch is not gonna fair too well compared to the *average* modern car
I'm just saying that a 86 base with clogged cats or tired engine and slipping clutch is not gonna fair too well compared to the *average* modern car
#19
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FK EPIC FU
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
160 is possible.
My new rebuilt engine with Racing beat exaust, down pipe to mufflers, pulled about 165. however this was on a down hill stretch. it can go about 130 up hill.
the major problem with maintaining these speeds is heat build up. If you plan on regularly pushing the rex to these limits it would be highly recomendable to make sure the coolent system is up to par, if not eagle. I think that they (checker autozone) sell special coolent addatives that drops over all engine temp by as much as 20 degrees. I've never used it, though.
My new rebuilt engine with Racing beat exaust, down pipe to mufflers, pulled about 165. however this was on a down hill stretch. it can go about 130 up hill.
the major problem with maintaining these speeds is heat build up. If you plan on regularly pushing the rex to these limits it would be highly recomendable to make sure the coolent system is up to par, if not eagle. I think that they (checker autozone) sell special coolent addatives that drops over all engine temp by as much as 20 degrees. I've never used it, though.
#20
SOLD THE RX-7!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Mobius
160 is possible.
My new rebuilt engine with Racing beat exaust, down pipe to mufflers, pulled about 165.
160 is possible.
My new rebuilt engine with Racing beat exaust, down pipe to mufflers, pulled about 165.
#21
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FK EPIC FU
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
car did not redline
car did not red line. Sat in 5th gear and buried @ 150 while continuing to accelerate with no redline beep or fuel cut-out. I think that she was probably just under 8000
#22
No longer cares
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: just a bit north of your business
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, Here's an idea I think we can all live with. We all probably know someone with a little GPS unit they use for fishing or whatever. Use some velcro and stick it to the dash and watch it's reported MPH readings. The satalite couldn't care less if you're reaching redline or have improper air pressure or any of that crap. Also, GPS is legal to navigate aircraft with so they have to be "somewhat" accurate (read: dead on *****) to prevent people from falling from the sky below stall speed.
When I get my motor done, (hopefully before august) I'll take my `86 N/a out and do the same.
When I get my motor done, (hopefully before august) I'll take my `86 N/a out and do the same.
#23
Currently Winning
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now, I'm all about speed and all, but something you need to realize (and I'm sure most of you know this, but I'm just saying):
Anything past 140mph is scary. To me.
I dont' know, maybe it was the dump truck almost merging into my lane at 150mph that did it to me.
Hah. Whatever.
Anything past 140mph is scary. To me.
I dont' know, maybe it was the dump truck almost merging into my lane at 150mph that did it to me.
Hah. Whatever.
#24
Full Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by kleetuz
I made 151 with just with adding the racing beat exhaust. And I was at about 6300 rpm when I saw the end of the road coming up quick. I suspect I could get at least 155 by 8000rpm if not a little more. So it shouldn't be too hard to get to 160
I made 151 with just with adding the racing beat exhaust. And I was at about 6300 rpm when I saw the end of the road coming up quick. I suspect I could get at least 155 by 8000rpm if not a little more. So it shouldn't be too hard to get to 160
at what 9000 Rpm? LOL. the car redlines before 150.
Based on the 200hp S5 Turbo's 135mph top speed, to reach 160mph (156km/h) you need 333hp. To get 300km/h (188mph) you'd need 536hp and taller gearing.
I'm at Drakk0r's house working on his n/a-turbo project. I'll mess with it when I get home.
#25
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Drakk0r
I'm curious as to what variables you inputed. Stock FC is .31 CD, and a turbo II with the "aero package" is .29.
I'm curious as to what variables you inputed. Stock FC is .31 CD, and a turbo II with the "aero package" is .29.