2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

160 mph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 06:22 PM
  #26  
rx7_ragtop's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, Texas, USA, Earth, Solar System...
Originally posted by 13bpower
I your N/A is running right it will easily do 120+ It would also have no problem beating a Jeep in a straight line. My girlfriend has a 95 wrangler, and it cant even come close to my 88 vert.
I've seen 120 in my 'vert... with the TOP DOWN.

Brad
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 06:26 PM
  #27  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by rx7_ragtop
I've seen 120 in my 'vert... with the TOP DOWN.
Damn, your brave! I did 160km/h (100mph) and thought I was doing to be sucked out!
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 06:46 PM
  #28  
Silkworm's Avatar
Has been.. hangin' around
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Milpitas, CA
According to my gearing calculator, I was doing 126, with 4:10s and 1:1 4th gear, at the end of the straight at T-hill, at 7500 RPM.

Still had 5th to go, but was running out of room going into turn 1.

PaulC
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 06:51 PM
  #29  
gotorx7's Avatar
The 7 can't lose!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Originally posted by rx7_ragtop


I've seen 120 in my 'vert... with the TOP DOWN.

Brad
Yep, I've seen 210kmh (120mph) indicated with the top down too, on a few occasions - passing usually - with lots more to go from the feel of it.

Must find a really nice stretch of road sometime and wind her out....
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 06:53 PM
  #30  
gotorx7's Avatar
The 7 can't lose!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Damn, your brave! I did 160km/h (100mph) and thought I was doing to be sucked out!
No way! the faster you go, the better it gets
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 06:59 PM
  #31  
VetteKiller's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 366
Likes: 3
From: North Reading, MA
Originally posted by NZConvertible
No variables are needed. As stated, this is based on the power and top speed of a stock S5 Turbo (146kW, 216km/h, Australian Motor magazine, 1989). Assuming CdA doesn’t change (i.e. you’re just adding power, no bodywork), the new top speed is easily calculated from the relationship between power and speed.
a power to speed ratio with out outside variables is a very in accurate way to calculate how much HP is actually needed to go 160mph.

The racing beat FC did 238mph with a MOSTLY STOCK body and 537hp @14.7psi. Not that you didn't already know that, just pointing it out for the slower folk

Next rant:

150mph in a S4 TII is NOT @ the redline. At 145mph INDICATED by the stock speedo the tach reads a solid 6,350 RPM. When redlined in 5th gear the actual top speed resides between 157mph and 163mph but I forgot just where
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 07:11 PM
  #32  
NA86RULZ's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: New Haven, CT
ONLY 135?

are you sure that a TII will only do 135?? I have had my 86 na gen 2 up to that, with more room to still accelerate. Just question...and oh yeah, my car is bone stock.

Mike
---------
'86 NA
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 07:48 PM
  #33  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Based on the 200hp S5 Turbo's 135mph top speed, to reach 160mph (156km/h) you need 333hp. To get 300km/h (188mph) you'd need 536hp and taller gearing.
Wow, you Anzacs sure have some seriously thick air down there, as well as a strange set of transmission gears. LOL.

Originally posted by NZConvertible
BTW, I should have mentioned in my previous post that an FC would probably take flight before it reached 300km/h!
http://www.racingbeat.com/Gallery/86Bonneville%20.jpg
Like Funklord stated, Stock Body (mostly) 238.442mph = 383.735kph
However, finding a driver, tires, and road suitable for that speed may prove a bit difficult.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 08:17 PM
  #34  
VetteKiller's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 366
Likes: 3
From: North Reading, MA
Re: ONLY 135?

Originally posted by NA86RULZ
are you sure that a TII will only do 135?? I have had my 86 na gen 2 up to that, with more room to still accelerate. Just question...and oh yeah, my car is bone stock.

Mike
---------
'86 NA

given ample road a S4 TII in PRIME CONDITION should be able to hit 140 - 145.

a S5 is like 145 - 150.

The cars climb good through the first 4 gears, its that fifth gear that slows her down
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 08:41 PM
  #35  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Damn double post...

Last edited by NZConvertible; Jul 1, 2002 at 08:46 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 08:43 PM
  #36  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by VetteKiller
a power to speed ratio with out outside variables is a very in accurate way to calculate how much HP is actually needed to go 160mph.
What I’m talking about is increasing the power of one car and making no other changes. That was the original question. So the variables (coefficient of drag, cross-sectional area, density of air) don’t change and thus cancel themselves out of the equation, leaving only speed and power. The relationship between them in these circumstances is set in stone and easily calculated. I’m not making this up y’know...
150mph in a S4 TII is NOT @ the redline. At 145mph INDICATED by the stock speedo the tach reads a solid 6,350 RPM. When redlined in 5th gear the actual top speed resides between 157mph and 163mph but I forgot just where
The baseline data I’m using is from an Aussie mag that tested the 89 Turbo using a Daltron Correvit that’s worth thousands of dollars and has been proven to be highly accurate, as opposed to the stock speedo which is way off at high speed. They measured the top speed at 216 km/h (135mph) at 5950rpm in 5th. This means 7000rpm would give 159mph. So your figures are about right.

BTW, that Racing Beat RX-7 may have a close to stock body, but it also has very narrow tires (lower drag and frictional losses) and is very low. So straight away thay reduces coefficient of drag and cross-sectional area. Air flowing under the car is very turbulant, and it’s makes them unstable at high speed (ask Mark Webber); RB obviously knew that.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 09:18 PM
  #37  
VetteKiller's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 366
Likes: 3
From: North Reading, MA
Originally posted by NZConvertible
The baseline data I’m using is from an Aussie mag that tested the 89 Turbo using a Daltron Correvit that’s worth thousands of dollars and has been proven to be highly accurate, as opposed to the stock speedo which is way off at high speed. They measured the top speed at 216 km/h (135mph) at 5950rpm in 5th. This means 7000rpm would give 159mph. So your figures are about right.

BTW, that Racing Beat RX-7 may have a close to stock body, but it also has very narrow tires (lower drag and frictional losses) and is very low. So straight away thay reduces coefficient of drag and cross-sectional area. Air flowing under the car is very turbulant, and it’s makes them unstable at high speed (ask Mark Webber); RB obviously knew that.

ok I'll admit that math is not my strong subject. my only point was that 250 - 260 hp at the crank will yield you 160mph in a FC
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 09:49 PM
  #38  
Drakk0r's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
This is relvinnian again. I did some of my own digging. A series IV with a base of .31 drag cd, and stock peak power made around 6500 rpms, stock tire height of 24.85", 4.10 final, .76 5th, the top speed would be around 142 MPH @ 6400 RPMs in 5th.

For a s5 T2 same perimeters. 5th is .72, 200 bhp @ 6500. Top speed is 147 MPH @ ~6400 RPMs.

With a .29 CD, it is changed to 144/149 respectively. Completely stock.

NZ Conv. I think your calculations are way off. I'm sure why you are getting the numbers you are. Maybe this has something to do with it:

Wow, you Anzacs sure have some seriously thick air down there, as well as a strange set of transmission gears. LOL.
LOL
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 10:49 PM
  #39  
FEDREX's Avatar
"Just Looking".......
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Treasure Coast, FL
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Based on the 200hp S5 Turbo's 135mph top speed, to reach 160mph (156km/h) you need 333hp. To get 300km/h (188mph) you'd need 536hp and taller gearing.
?

The Series 5's do 151mph off the showroom floor.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 11:40 PM
  #40  
ajsuper7's Avatar
Nothin But a G Thang
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
doesnt the GTUs have a different 5th gear...i wonder what it maxes out at? modded or not
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 11:44 PM
  #41  
TurboSmoke's Avatar
Getting Boosted
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Ft Myers Fl
i think my speedo is messed up i had it flored in my 91na and i hit 140 i think it is messed up i got pulled over for doing 60 in a 40 and it said i was doing 45
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2002 | 12:28 AM
  #42  
Node's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 3
From: Stinson Beach, Ca
Soul Assasin can do NEAR 180mph (300kph) but he has different gears, and over 500rwhp when he said this.
And he has an RE Amemiya FC2000 front bumper, and no spoiler (not even stock spoiler)
I bet he had a little more power to use also.
It would be best if he clarified this himself.

Last edited by Node; Jul 2, 2002 at 12:35 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2002 | 12:29 AM
  #43  
Node's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 3
From: Stinson Beach, Ca
Originally posted by ajsuper7
doesnt the GTUs have a different 5th gear...i wonder what it maxes out at? modded or not
Yes, they do have a different 5th gear, but I don't have my charts on this computer to tell you what they are (or what stock N/A are for that matter)
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2002 | 12:37 AM
  #44  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by Drakk0r
This is relvinnian again. I did some of my own digging. A series IV with a base of .31 drag cd, and stock peak power made around 6500 rpms, stock tire height of 24.85", 4.10 final, .76 5th, the top speed would be around 142 MPH @ 6400 RPMs in 5th.
Show me how you calculated that. Prove me wrong and I'll happily admit it, but I'm using a top speed measured with a very accurate performance meter, and a basic, long-proven physical relationship.
BTW, your tires are a little big. They measure 300mm from the ground to the centreline, giving a rolling diameter (different to overall diameter) of 23.62".
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2002 | 02:30 AM
  #45  
E6KT2's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
What is the s4 fifth gear? I used .82 with a 205/55-16 tire at 24.88" and a 4.10 to get 176mph @ 8000rpm. That's not hard to pull in a TII, but is the fifth gear .82?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2002 | 02:40 AM
  #46  
The Ace's Avatar
Greek Power
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Originally posted by FEDREX


?

The Series 5's do 151mph off the showroom floor.
Not quite....unless you want to go through that glass window up front

The only numbers that I know of, for Europe/Japan spec TIIs, are the 135+ mph (220kph) actual speed indicated by the factory specs, and the 240kph that I saw on the speedo with 80% boost and horribly clogged exhaust.

I also know that a '91 TII with turbo-back exhaust and cone filter does 250+ kph easily, so it could max out the stock speedo...

...and you do all know that air resistance is exponentially increased, right ?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2002 | 03:15 AM
  #47  
The Ace's Avatar
Greek Power
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Oooppss, forgot to add: according to http://2ndgenrx7.freeservers.com/specsmaster.html, '91 TII has 146mph (234kph) top speed
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2002 | 04:43 AM
  #48  
RotaryMiata's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Damn, your brave! I did 160km/h (100mph) and thought I was doing to be sucked out!
I do that in my Miata daily!!!

RM
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2002 | 04:56 AM
  #49  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by E6KT2
What is the s4 fifth gear? I used .82 with a 205/55-16 tire at 24.88" and a 4.10 to get 176mph @ 8000rpm.
The S4 5th gear is 0.762:1.
Your 24.88" (632mm) diameter is a calculated figure, which rarely matches reality (don't ask me why, ask the tire makers). It's also the overall diameter, which is the wrong number to use because the bottom of tires compress under the cars weight. You need to measure the distance from the ground to the center of the wheel. This'll give you a 300mm rolling radius.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2002 | 07:51 AM
  #50  
TurboSmoke's Avatar
Getting Boosted
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Ft Myers Fl
Originally posted by The Ace
Oooppss, forgot to add: according to http://2ndgenrx7.freeservers.com/specsmaster.html, '91 TII has 146mph (234kph) top speed

thow us a link that work
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 AM.