1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Water de-Carbonizing ??? ( I read the threads )

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 10:46 PM
  #1  
DAVID GRIMES's Avatar
Thread Starter
How About A Cup Of STFU
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: ALBANY, GA
Question Water de-Carbonizing ??? ( I read the threads )

I read the threads on getting rid of carbon buildup. So I get a good spray bottle and give it a drink without making it die. It said give it a couple bottles for good measure. I've seen how water can totally clean a boinger cylinder and ( the P word ) when one head gasket lets coolant onto one side. When you pull em both off it's like shiny new vs. soot city !

( If you read my speel, you'd know about 8 years with the dizzy 180 out ! I didn't do it, but dammit I owned it and it's a little embarrassing, I tell you ! ) 3500 miles under those firing conditions has the potential to have made alot of buckyballs.

My question: If I do this procedure, is there any potential for damage or somehow that I can do it wrong and hurt anything ?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 11:23 PM
  #2  
Unsupa's Avatar
Blew my 3rd one 12/8/08
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: Inman SC
i did it.. car still running great at almost 192k... i used warm water though, didn't wanna chance anything..
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #3  
kettlman's Avatar
THE ONE. THE ONLY!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 2
From: wa
i've done it many times. but for danger? i'd say putting anything thats not made for it has a potential danger. but i wouldn't worry. but keep an eye on the temp. when you do it it tends to run hot. i just pretty much pour the water down like i was pouring a glass of beer(without the tilt). then after you do the water, do some mmo also.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 12:10 AM
  #4  
mcnannay's Avatar
Lean Mean Speed Thingie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, ID
only thing that might do some damage is if a large chunk of buildup happens to break off and cause problems. i do this at every oil change, along with mmo...can't say its made a difference but id like to think so
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 12:16 AM
  #5  
d0 Luck's Avatar
raysspl.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
didn't feel any difference either
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #6  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
I used water after recovering from a major flooding issue this spring. Seems to have worked ok, but it may have split my cat. The cat seemed ok before, but toward the end of the water treatment (about two liters worth) I had water running out of a sidelong split in my cat. FYI.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 03:26 PM
  #7  
Moonchopper's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
I suppose this wouldn't cause much of a problem with a rotary engine since you're not trying to actually compress the water, right?

I've always understood that if you put water in a boinger (mist, not full liquid), it could help it out, but I would think that if you put actually liquid in that it would break something (on a boinger, the rods would get bent and such since you can't compress a liquid.)

What's the deal with this?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 03:33 PM
  #8  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
The dizzy shaft 180° out shouldn't cause a problem because it spins at half eccentric shaft speed.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #9  
BMS2004's Avatar
Frankencar
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
moonchopper is right you don't want to pour it down there, hydrolock is bad. don't be too generous i'm sure you'll be fine.

Ron
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #10  
mfigr1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: CA
Steve Kan spoke about this at Sevenstock this year. I actually did this to my 1980 RX-7 yesterday and had no problems. I was skeptical at first and felt kinda of nervous doing it but the car still runs so it seems not to harm it. He said it was hard to hydro a rotary motor. I havent driven the car since it's not registered so i can't tell if there was an improvement.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 04:19 PM
  #11  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
I've had very good success spraying 1/2 a big can of Gumout carb cleaner down the carb chokes with the motor running. Cleans out the carb too!

I did the water spray on the REPU and it did run a little better, but the carb cleaner worked better IMO.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 06:27 PM
  #12  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
I used some carb cleaner spray on my REPU once, which caused it to run better.

Last edited by Jeff20B; Oct 4, 2004 at 06:32 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 09:29 PM
  #13  
Moonchopper's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
I suppose it's because the rotor goes in somewhat of a circle instead of straight up and down.

Plus, there aren't any rods to bend in a rotary.

7's own

[edit] Oops, I just realized that you don't put water in it when it's not running. Maybe that's why it works. I would assume it's because it still atomizes the water and allows it to be combusted. (Or something to that effect)

Last edited by Moonchopper; Oct 4, 2004 at 09:32 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 11:58 PM
  #14  
mcnannay's Avatar
Lean Mean Speed Thingie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, ID
bms2004, i dump water down my carb pretty liberally, as long as you keep the revs up around 4k, i think you're aren't gonna run into any problems, of course the rpms drop down a bit once you dump water in, i think mine was right around 3k last time at about 3/4 throttle. The first time i did it, i used a hose to suck water in, i actually think it sucked water down the carb using the vacuum line alot faster than i pour, and i pour it pretty fast.

and by the way, although i've never noticed a difference on my 83, my bros 84 gsl 12a ran a ton smoother after doing the h2o trick, so i know it does help....
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 05:43 AM
  #15  
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
I
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 12
From: Spanaway, WA
i did this water trick and afterwards i had water in my oil!!!!!! im not sure what happend, was tring to fix a "stuck seal" but pulled engine apart anyway and a side seal and corner seal were jamed all the way down. the car also kinda smoked a bit before hand at high rpm.

would that have caused the water to get into the oil??
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 06:46 AM
  #16  
rotary_neubie's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba Canada
I have done this several times... I usually do it once ever 2 or 3 oil changes.... and I don't use a heck of alot of water... just about one cup, and I just quirt it from a gatorade bottle down the carb... The car seems to run abit smoother for awhile after doing this... but I also don't think my car has a serious carbon build up problem either...otherwise you'd think that the h20 treatment wouldhave a greater effect... Myself, I would rather use water than carb cleaner.... carb cleaner just makes me a little nervous, its an agressive chemical, as apposed to water... so I try to stay away from it....but thats just my little superstition, and it probably has no merit to it. Later.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 07:26 AM
  #17  
DAVID GRIMES's Avatar
Thread Starter
How About A Cup Of STFU
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: ALBANY, GA
Originally Posted by Jeff20B
The dizzy shaft 180° out shouldn't cause a problem because it spins at half eccentric shaft speed.
I'm not knowledgable enough to argue, but...

At 1/2 the eccentric shaft speed, if the eccentric shaft and rotors turn one revolution, then the dizzy would turn twice and fire off four times total ( two leading and two trailing ). In one complete revolution, both rotors are "positioned" to the firing position 3 times each. It would seem that six (6) firings would be necessary.

Straighten me out, Jeff.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 01:44 PM
  #18  
se7chaotic's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Seems like the water treatment is a pretty safe bet. I might give it a try. My 7 runs good, but it saw alot of low rpm/highway driving from the previous owner, so it's probably got some carbon buildup. Can I do this on a GSL-SE though? There's no carb, so I can't just pour it down into the engine.. (Sometimes I miss my old 12a GSL...) What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #19  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
Ever try Amsoil Power Foam? Works fantastic.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 05:35 PM
  #20  
REVHED's Avatar
Hunting Skylines
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 4
From: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
I'm not knowledgable enough to argue, but...

At 1/2 the eccentric shaft speed, if the eccentric shaft and rotors turn one revolution, then the dizzy would turn twice and fire off four times total ( two leading and two trailing ). In one complete revolution, both rotors are "positioned" to the firing position 3 times each. It would seem that six (6) firings would be necessary.

Straighten me out, Jeff.
I don't want to confuse you even more but the rotors turn at 1/3 the speed of the eccentric shaft.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #21  
BMS2004's Avatar
Frankencar
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
^ this is true. and since this is true for every rev the dist fires 2 leading and 2 trailing. this is also the reason why you hook a tach up to a rotary as if its a 4 cyl because 2 signals from a coil per rev.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 10:25 PM
  #22  
DAVID GRIMES's Avatar
Thread Starter
How About A Cup Of STFU
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: ALBANY, GA
NOW LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT.

For every one (1) revolution of the concentric shaft,
the rotors turn 1/3 of a revolution ,
for each revolution of the dizzy, one leading and one trailing plug fires
the dizzy shaft turns 2 revolutions per concentric shaft revolution
so the dizzy fires four times per concentric revolution
So for every revolution of concentric shaft, two rotors' faces present for combustion, each requiring a leading and trailing, so 2 each times 2 = 4

OK I got it !!! Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #23  
BMS2004's Avatar
Frankencar
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
close the dizzy turns 180 degrees per eccentric shaft revolution. Thats why its still possible for the dizzy to be 180 degress off. i don't know how to explain it other than that, look at the cap and rotor. yes i have and still confused.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 12:02 AM
  #24  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Scroll down to the bottom for some pics. you'll notice the arrow on the rotor is not pointing forward, nor is the flat section of the dizzy shaft even though the engine is at TDC. https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...9&page=2&pp=15
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 01:04 AM
  #25  
REVHED's Avatar
Hunting Skylines
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 4
From: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
NOW LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT.

For every one (1) revolution of the concentric shaft,
the rotors turn 1/3 of a revolution ,
for each revolution of the dizzy, one leading and one trailing plug fires
the dizzy shaft turns 2 revolutions per concentric shaft revolution
so the dizzy fires four times per concentric revolution
So for every revolution of concentric shaft, two rotors' faces present for combustion, each requiring a leading and trailing, so 2 each times 2 = 4

OK I got it !!! Thanks
That's not even close. The dizzy only turns 1/2 a revolution for every single revolution of the eccentric shaft. You need to think of the leading and trailing ignitions as completely separate systems even though they share the same distributor.

The only way to learn is to remove the dizzy cap and rotor and take a close look at how it all works. After that you should see how simple it is.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Feb 26, 2021 10:12 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM
FD7KiD
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Aug 17, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.