1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Tach Doesn’t Go Past 8300? RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2003 | 06:20 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Castle Rock Washignton
Tach Doesn’t Go Past 8300? RPM

Hey my tach doesn’t want to go any more past about 8300... Does this happen on all 1st gens or do I have a wiring problem or something??? The engine is revving past 8300 but the tach doesn’t... Forgive me if this is a repost... I posted a thread like this but it didn’t show up for some reason...
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2003 | 07:38 PM
  #2  
WackyRotary's Avatar
standard combustion
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities Minnesota
The tac stops there yes, at least in both 84 and 85 models I have. Why are you reving that high? Do you have a bridgeport also? I never rev'd past 8Krpm unless I missed a shift with a mild or stockport. Bridgeport, perpheral intake porting that makes power peaks past 8000rpm nessessitating reving that high. Otherwise your just over-reving for no reason since your past the power peak a bit.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2003 | 07:54 PM
  #3  
Mr_Rx7_Au's Avatar
Aussie Rx7 Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia
I was goin to say, I hope you have a PP or a Bridge Port, coz otherwise reving that high isn't really goin to do that much for ya...
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2003 | 08:00 PM
  #4  
specRX7_22's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Eastern PA
8300 rpm??? my god theres no need for that lol. i can see redlining it, but theres no reason to take it to 8300 lol
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2003 | 08:41 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Castle Rock Washignton
I have street port... I am past my PEAK power but its still makeing more torque after 8k in 1st then it is in 2nd at the ground...
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2003 | 08:49 PM
  #6  
rx7 Nut's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
You might not want to rev that high, even with a streetport. And if the tach stops at 8300rpm how do you know when you've gone past 8500rpm(a no no).
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2003 | 10:00 PM
  #7  
MosesX605's Avatar
My wife bought me 2 RX-7s
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 3
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
I should think that you wouldn't want to kick the crap out of your engine like that. The gains don't outweigh the potential hazards. Without seeing your dyno sheet, I can't speak to your power curve, but with a stock motor's torque peak at 4k rpm, I find it unlikely that your motor is producing anything usefull at 8.3 k. Unless your engine builder balanced that eccentric shaft, it will be bending a fair amount at that kind of revs. Sooner or later, you'll get contact between a rotor and its housing and boom, no more motor.

Matt
1979 SA22C
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 12:03 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Castle Rock Washignton
I live my life a rotary engine at a time and for those 10k miles OR LESS I am free I KNOW I have revved my motor past 8500 rpm... why is hat a no no? are you talking about water pump cavitation??? Its all about the gearing though... gears are torque multipliers... your generating ALOT more torque to the ground in 1st gear then 2nd at the same rpm... goes the same with the rest of the gears... I have a bad oil ring any way... Think I should make a custom aviator 1st gear 40 mph...
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 03:39 AM
  #9  
rx7passion's Avatar
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Az
well i dont know if this is the explaination your looking for but the reason a tach doesnt go past 8300rpm or so is the design of the tach. i played around with a few 84-85 tachometers trying to get it to rev past the 8200-8500 mark. heres the reason, the needle follows on a horseshoe shaped plastic and metal track. there and 2 big stops the bottom where the tach sits at 0 rpm and round 8300 or so. you can cut the plastic/metal if your real carefull and dont bend the metal spiral that moves that tach around. that gets you to about 9500-10k rpm area. it can be dont but for the time and effort you might as well get a aftermarket tach thats accurate. hope that helps you out...
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 09:18 AM
  #10  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
Originally posted by MosesX605
I should think that you wouldn't want to kick the crap out of your engine like that. The gains don't outweigh the potential hazards.
Exactly. Unless your engine has the plates clearance for high RPM (I doubt it), there is a great danger of you E-shaft having a small flex at those RPMs. Then the Rotors would be slighlty out of alignment and really scratch, break, chatter, all inside of the Rotor's travel areas. - Basically, it becomes a worthless engine with no re-usable parts.

Originally posted by MosesX605
but with a stock motor's torque peak at 4k rpm,
I strongly diasagree. The torque and HP curve on a 4-port is higher than 4K. On a Ported engine, it is almost a linear line, going up with more RPM.

Originally posted by i_piss_on_hondas
I Its all about the gearing though... gears are torque multipliers... your generating ALOT more torque to the ground in 1st gear then 2nd at the same rpm... goes the same with the rest of the gears...
High RPM revving comes to a point of diminishing returns as well. More RPM, doesn't equal faster than shifting at an earlier RPM.

Again, with the Rotor edges hitting the side plates, you're not going to be able to rebuild that engine. Shifting at such Higher RPM, the punishment takes it's toll on the whole drivetrain as well. Not to mention a shattering clutch at those RPM's can put you in a wheelchair without legs real fast. I think if you practice right, and learn the true HP curve of your engine, you'll see that approximately 7000 RPM will probably be a better place for you to shift.

Just looking out for you and your Rex.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
MosesX605's Avatar
My wife bought me 2 RX-7s
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 3
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Directfreak, do you have torque graphs for the stock port 12A? I was under the impression from the road tests I have read that torque peaked at 4k and dropped off thereafter. But, as I've said before and will say again, I'm no expert

Matt
1979 SA22C
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 12:08 PM
  #12  
pratch's Avatar
Mazspeed.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
And here I thought the meat of the powerband was about 5.5k-7k on a stockport. Please enlighten
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Castle Rock Washignton
Well the block is pretty screwed anyway... Has a bad oil ring.. man u guys were bitching at me for revving my motor past 8k... I wonder what you guys would say if I told you about 1/3 of my oil is hyperlube to stop it from making a cloud that’s reminiscent of the nuclear explosion at Hiroshima
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 04:08 PM
  #14  
Mr_Rx7_Au's Avatar
Aussie Rx7 Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia
ahhaha, here we go again :P
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 09:46 PM
  #15  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
Originally posted by MosesX605
Directfreak, do you have torque graphs for the stock port 12A? I was under the impression from the road tests I have read that torque peaked at 4k and dropped off thereafter. But, as I've said before and will say again, I'm no expert

Matt
1979 SA22C
There's some Dyno sheets at the bottom. Both Stock port and street port.
http://personal.riverusers.com/~yawpower/strtcrb.html

By the way, for RACING, HP is more important than Torque.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 09:59 PM
  #16  
851stgen12a's Avatar
Off riding sportbikes!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Wa
Urghhhhh
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 10:06 PM
  #17  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally posted by Directfreak

By the way, for RACING, HP is more important than Torque.
How's that, since HP comes from torque and RPM? Why do you think low displacement NA engines have to have the **** revved out of them?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 06:09 AM
  #18  
Narcisse91's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
I think what he's saying is that for racing (not sure what kind), you're better off building up some top end HP then stroking the engine or adding forced induction to increase the amount of torque.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #19  
82streetracer's Avatar
8/1 Building/Drive Ratio
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 1
From: Mound, MN
i wound my old 12a to 8k at least once a day, pulled strong the whole way.

stock port with streetport exhaust and fuel and ignition upgrades.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Castle Rock Washignton
Hp is torque at rpm... a overall achievment of work done. I AM SHURE I was making more torque at 8500 in 1st then at 6000 in 2nd...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
alexdimen
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
Oct 23, 2015 01:50 PM
ChanBagz
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Sep 17, 2015 03:36 PM
rx7shirley
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Sep 2, 2015 02:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 PM.