1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Tach Doesn’t Go Past 8300? RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-03, 06:20 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Castle Rock Washignton
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tach Doesn’t Go Past 8300? RPM

Hey my tach doesn’t want to go any more past about 8300... Does this happen on all 1st gens or do I have a wiring problem or something??? The engine is revving past 8300 but the tach doesn’t... Forgive me if this is a repost... I posted a thread like this but it didn’t show up for some reason...
Old 01-19-03, 07:38 PM
  #2  
standard combustion

 
WackyRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The tac stops there yes, at least in both 84 and 85 models I have. Why are you reving that high? Do you have a bridgeport also? I never rev'd past 8Krpm unless I missed a shift with a mild or stockport. Bridgeport, perpheral intake porting that makes power peaks past 8000rpm nessessitating reving that high. Otherwise your just over-reving for no reason since your past the power peak a bit.
Old 01-19-03, 07:54 PM
  #3  
Aussie Rx7 Freak

 
Mr_Rx7_Au's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was goin to say, I hope you have a PP or a Bridge Port, coz otherwise reving that high isn't really goin to do that much for ya...
Old 01-19-03, 08:00 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
specRX7_22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
8300 rpm??? my god theres no need for that lol. i can see redlining it, but theres no reason to take it to 8300 lol
Old 01-19-03, 08:41 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Castle Rock Washignton
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have street port... I am past my PEAK power but its still makeing more torque after 8k in 1st then it is in 2nd at the ground...
Old 01-19-03, 08:49 PM
  #6  
Full Member

 
rx7 Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You might not want to rev that high, even with a streetport. And if the tach stops at 8300rpm how do you know when you've gone past 8500rpm(a no no).
Old 01-19-03, 10:00 PM
  #7  
My wife bought me 2 RX-7s

 
MosesX605's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I should think that you wouldn't want to kick the crap out of your engine like that. The gains don't outweigh the potential hazards. Without seeing your dyno sheet, I can't speak to your power curve, but with a stock motor's torque peak at 4k rpm, I find it unlikely that your motor is producing anything usefull at 8.3 k. Unless your engine builder balanced that eccentric shaft, it will be bending a fair amount at that kind of revs. Sooner or later, you'll get contact between a rotor and its housing and boom, no more motor.

Matt
1979 SA22C
Old 01-20-03, 12:03 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Castle Rock Washignton
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I live my life a rotary engine at a time and for those 10k miles OR LESS I am free I KNOW I have revved my motor past 8500 rpm... why is hat a no no? are you talking about water pump cavitation??? Its all about the gearing though... gears are torque multipliers... your generating ALOT more torque to the ground in 1st gear then 2nd at the same rpm... goes the same with the rest of the gears... I have a bad oil ring any way... Think I should make a custom aviator 1st gear 40 mph...
Old 01-20-03, 03:39 AM
  #9  

 
rx7passion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well i dont know if this is the explaination your looking for but the reason a tach doesnt go past 8300rpm or so is the design of the tach. i played around with a few 84-85 tachometers trying to get it to rev past the 8200-8500 mark. heres the reason, the needle follows on a horseshoe shaped plastic and metal track. there and 2 big stops the bottom where the tach sits at 0 rpm and round 8300 or so. you can cut the plastic/metal if your real carefull and dont bend the metal spiral that moves that tach around. that gets you to about 9500-10k rpm area. it can be dont but for the time and effort you might as well get a aftermarket tach thats accurate. hope that helps you out...
Old 01-20-03, 09:18 AM
  #10  
I can has a Hemi? Yes...

iTrader: (2)
 
Directfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 3OH5
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by MosesX605
I should think that you wouldn't want to kick the crap out of your engine like that. The gains don't outweigh the potential hazards.
Exactly. Unless your engine has the plates clearance for high RPM (I doubt it), there is a great danger of you E-shaft having a small flex at those RPMs. Then the Rotors would be slighlty out of alignment and really scratch, break, chatter, all inside of the Rotor's travel areas. - Basically, it becomes a worthless engine with no re-usable parts.

Originally posted by MosesX605
but with a stock motor's torque peak at 4k rpm,
I strongly diasagree. The torque and HP curve on a 4-port is higher than 4K. On a Ported engine, it is almost a linear line, going up with more RPM.

Originally posted by i_piss_on_hondas
I Its all about the gearing though... gears are torque multipliers... your generating ALOT more torque to the ground in 1st gear then 2nd at the same rpm... goes the same with the rest of the gears...
High RPM revving comes to a point of diminishing returns as well. More RPM, doesn't equal faster than shifting at an earlier RPM.

Again, with the Rotor edges hitting the side plates, you're not going to be able to rebuild that engine. Shifting at such Higher RPM, the punishment takes it's toll on the whole drivetrain as well. Not to mention a shattering clutch at those RPM's can put you in a wheelchair without legs real fast. I think if you practice right, and learn the true HP curve of your engine, you'll see that approximately 7000 RPM will probably be a better place for you to shift.

Just looking out for you and your Rex.
Old 01-20-03, 11:53 AM
  #11  
My wife bought me 2 RX-7s

 
MosesX605's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Directfreak, do you have torque graphs for the stock port 12A? I was under the impression from the road tests I have read that torque peaked at 4k and dropped off thereafter. But, as I've said before and will say again, I'm no expert

Matt
1979 SA22C
Old 01-20-03, 12:08 PM
  #12  
Mazspeed.com

 
pratch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And here I thought the meat of the powerband was about 5.5k-7k on a stockport. Please enlighten
Old 01-20-03, 04:07 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Castle Rock Washignton
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well the block is pretty screwed anyway... Has a bad oil ring.. man u guys were bitching at me for revving my motor past 8k... I wonder what you guys would say if I told you about 1/3 of my oil is hyperlube to stop it from making a cloud that’s reminiscent of the nuclear explosion at Hiroshima
Old 01-20-03, 04:08 PM
  #14  
Aussie Rx7 Freak

 
Mr_Rx7_Au's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ahhaha, here we go again :P
Old 01-20-03, 09:46 PM
  #15  
I can has a Hemi? Yes...

iTrader: (2)
 
Directfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 3OH5
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by MosesX605
Directfreak, do you have torque graphs for the stock port 12A? I was under the impression from the road tests I have read that torque peaked at 4k and dropped off thereafter. But, as I've said before and will say again, I'm no expert

Matt
1979 SA22C
There's some Dyno sheets at the bottom. Both Stock port and street port.
http://personal.riverusers.com/~yawpower/strtcrb.html

By the way, for RACING, HP is more important than Torque.
Old 01-21-03, 09:59 PM
  #16  
Off riding sportbikes!

 
851stgen12a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver Wa
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Urghhhhh
Old 01-21-03, 10:06 PM
  #17  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Directfreak

By the way, for RACING, HP is more important than Torque.
How's that, since HP comes from torque and RPM? Why do you think low displacement NA engines have to have the **** revved out of them?
Old 01-22-03, 06:09 AM
  #18  
Full Member

 
Narcisse91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think what he's saying is that for racing (not sure what kind), you're better off building up some top end HP then stroking the engine or adding forced induction to increase the amount of torque.
Old 01-22-03, 11:10 AM
  #19  
8/1 Building/Drive Ratio

iTrader: (1)
 
82streetracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orono, MN
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i wound my old 12a to 8k at least once a day, pulled strong the whole way.

stock port with streetport exhaust and fuel and ignition upgrades.
Old 01-22-03, 04:55 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Castle Rock Washignton
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hp is torque at rpm... a overall achievment of work done. I AM SHURE I was making more torque at 8500 in 1st then at 6000 in 2nd...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
alexdimen
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
10-23-15 01:50 PM
ChanBagz
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
09-17-15 03:36 PM
rx7shirley
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
09-02-15 02:11 PM



Quick Reply: Tach Doesn’t Go Past 8300? RPM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 AM.