Supercharge Your Car For $300?!?
#3
Airflow is my life
I dont think thatll work. You cant put fuel thru an Eaton. The teflon on the lobes will shed off. Someone here on our forum did it. The car ran for like 30 seconds. He needs to make that a dry flow/ blowthru setup.
#4
Nikki-Modder Rex-Rodder
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Trying to convince some clown not to put a Holley 600 on his 12a.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
6 Posts
The M-90 doesn't have the teflon.
The M-62 does.
I plan on offering a "Sterling Charger" blowthru kit using an M-90 and intercooler by next year.
The M-62 does.
I plan on offering a "Sterling Charger" blowthru kit using an M-90 and intercooler by next year.
#5
Is a roots blower really the most efficient option? Generally a roots blower is parked on top of a piston engines intake manifold, not blowing through a pipe. Especially since the rig pictured doesn't really have any curves or funnel shapes to help flow.
Oh well, the point here was for it to be cheap. The guy seems to have done his homework, and did a decent job fabbing it up. Bravo.
Oh well, the point here was for it to be cheap. The guy seems to have done his homework, and did a decent job fabbing it up. Bravo.
#6
Lean Mean Speed Thingie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moscow, ID
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Rx7carl
I dont think thatll work. You cant put fuel thru an Eaton.
I dont think thatll work. You cant put fuel thru an Eaton.
Trending Topics
#10
spoon!
Neat, low-buck way of doing things. May have long-term problems, and has lots of room for improvement, but still neat. It's not supposed to be the end-all of performance mods, just a cheap way to more power.
The basic idea would work for a blow-through carb setup too.
The basic idea would work for a blow-through carb setup too.
#12
Nikki-Modder Rex-Rodder
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Trying to convince some clown not to put a Holley 600 on his 12a.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
6 Posts
Originally posted by cpt_gloval
a fun little toy would be a 12a, m-90, and a sterling carb (he's developing boost-friendly carbs, no?)...
a fun little toy would be a 12a, m-90, and a sterling carb (he's developing boost-friendly carbs, no?)...
Search in this section under "M-90", and "M-62". You'll find where I entertained the very same idea using the Eaton as a cheap alternative to the -back then, hard to find- 7" Camden.
I was planning at first to simply box the carb, but it'll be less work to prep the carb and cap it.
#13
So little time and money
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NorCAL
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there going to be a EFI kit anytime?
BTW, if anyone else was as confused as me about superchargers, you should check out this site. Has some pretty interesting TECH articles.
superchargersonline.com
BTW, if anyone else was as confused as me about superchargers, you should check out this site. Has some pretty interesting TECH articles.
superchargersonline.com
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: East Tenn (Tri-Cities Area)
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alright, so now I could either get a sterling for my stock port, stock intake. OR.......a sterling made to go with this M-90 eaton s/c off a t-bird?
please correct me if I'm wrong here.
If so, what would be the difference?
What's the risks of running this s/c on a n/a rotary?
please correct me if I'm wrong here.
If so, what would be the difference?
What's the risks of running this s/c on a n/a rotary?
#18
Burning Oil-Grinding 3rd
Originally posted by ioTus
Why dont ppl mount the supercharger where the air conditioning used to mount? THe bolts are already in there, plenty of room, and it would be a straight over-engine shot to the carb.
Seems to me that would work well!!
Why dont ppl mount the supercharger where the air conditioning used to mount? THe bolts are already in there, plenty of room, and it would be a straight over-engine shot to the carb.
Seems to me that would work well!!
I have always thought that would be the way to do it. Only hard part is the inlet is on the back of the SC.
#20
Burning Oil-Grinding 3rd
Originally posted by 1stgen_tn
i thought the s/c needs to be in between the carb and intake, aren't most hotrods that way. Just one sittin on top of the other?
i thought the s/c needs to be in between the carb and intake, aren't most hotrods that way. Just one sittin on top of the other?
the M90 is made for EFI and can not have fuel put through it. The one by Atkins is made the way you are thinking and works that way.
#21
Yea, I'm working on it...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Click click fucking click, Africa
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm a newblett when it comes to turbo's and superchargers so i've got a question, I know turbo's are driven by exhaust, and super chargers are driven by belts. So, wouldn't the supercharger be much more effecient than turbo's sense superchargers will not have lag (as trubo's do) since it does not have to wait for the exhaust to spool up the the turbine. And to get MORE power out of a supercharger all you need is a smaller gear, correct? when to get more power out of a turbo, you would have to buy a boost controller or somthing of that sort. my question is, why are turbo's so much more popular? And how do they make so much more power? I personally want to supercharge my car, but since turbo's are alot more popular, and easier to find info on, i will probably end up doing this, so if this thread develops to a vast source of information on supercharging a carbbed FB (lets say a 45DCOE ), it just might persuade me. Because, personally I like the idea of superchargers better.
#23
Nigga stole my bike!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Des Allemands, Louisiana
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, I feel a supercharger makes tons of sense on a rotary. I mean, the rotary engine isn't known for it's insane torque numbers; so, why not use this, which would give lots of low end power? I mean, it seems as though it would give the rotary a much wider power band...
#24
Resident Bitch
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Spoklahoma, WA
Posts: 4,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with cpt_gloval and clean85owner. I like the both of them, even though I love my supercharger in my first gen "camden". I like the low end power of things.
In my personal opinion though I think that your motor lasts longer with a supercharger rather than a turbo.
Catch 22 ya know...
My plans are to get another 1st gen and Turbo it, keep my supercharged one now, and actually see which one I love the most. For the right now power hands down supercharger.
In my personal opinion though I think that your motor lasts longer with a supercharger rather than a turbo.
Catch 22 ya know...
My plans are to get another 1st gen and Turbo it, keep my supercharged one now, and actually see which one I love the most. For the right now power hands down supercharger.