1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

stupid idea?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 02:32 PM
  #1  
buffalo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Big Island Hawaii
stupid idea?

Howzit, rx'ers- Maybe this is a brain fart, but has anyone considered hooking up their a/c cold air duct to their cold air intake? Cold air density charge is good for combustion right?- thoughts?- Aloha
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #2  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Better used as an intercooler. I don't think the benefits would outweigh the power drag on a non-turbo engine.

One way to find out though - dyno test it back to back and see what the results are.

FWIW I didn't see much benefit from icing the carb and intake manifold at the dragstrip. And I would *fill* the air cleaner outside of the filter with ice, put ice on the carb spacer plate, put ice in the ACV hole (note: this only works if you plug the air ports in the rotor housings and thus don't need an ACV blockoff), and put the rest of the ice bag on top of the air cleaner lid.

Before anyone asks, yes, I did make sure that all of the ice in the air cleaner was melted before shutting the hood and making my run...
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #3  
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
Have RX-7, will restore
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 22,577
Likes: 1,273
From: Ohio
that system you speak of is being tested by ford and seems to work effectively for them. however, they are working with EFI. you are working with a carb i assume. big difference there. i think it would work to an extent but the drag put on the engine by ther compressor would probably even things out. meaning it would be like you did nothing to increase performance. just my opinion.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 04:16 PM
  #4  
Fuel524's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: FL
sometimes the stupidest ideas are the best in the long run.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 04:34 PM
  #5  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Ford is testing it on naturally aspirated cars?

I do know that one of their supercharged V8s (Lightning?) uses an A/C evaporator core as an intercooler. And the idea's been around for a looooong time.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #6  
LongDuck's Avatar
84SE-EGI helpy-helperton
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 542
From: Phoenix, AZ
This is a thermodynamic losing situation - you can't gain more power from running your A/C, even if ALL of it, into your intake. Here's why;

The A/C compressor gets it's power from the crankshaft on the engine via belt, as the compressor is turned, it pumps high pressure freon (or R134 for some of you) through an expansion valve which cools the fluid (if it were a gas, it wouldn't work). This pumping action requires a lot of energy from the engine - enough so that Mazda designed an air control system to INCREASE the idle speed to keep it from killing the engine when the A/C turns on...

If you were to route the cooler A/C air to the intake, yes, you're providing colder air than outside, but you're also using energy from the engine to make it cold. Even a turbocharger has tremendous power losses to power it, and superchargers (belt-driven), also require huge amounts of power to make them even marginally successful in increasing overall engine performance.

You are burning crankshaft energy in an attempt to bring in cold air, but the gains that you have with colder intake air will have no chance to overcome the losses from powering the A/C compressor. When you add ice to the system (not dry ice, btw), then you're using an outside source to absorb heat.

There's no winning with this situation, and you can't hope to break even. Dyno test it,... you'll see.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 11:03 PM
  #7  
RotaryRyan's Avatar
DSM
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 1
From: Milton, FL
Good Point
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
Oct 1, 2015 11:53 PM
dexter snoek
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
Sep 29, 2015 09:18 AM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
Sep 28, 2015 04:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.