1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

stupid dumbarse idea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 01:10 AM
  #1  
Zulu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
stupid dumbarse idea

so, um, I suppose trying to extend my exhaust ports by just dropping off the header would be universally stupid, right? As in, take off the header and goto work on the port...

As it stands there's an emission legal intake & exhaust extended-port aka "streetport"
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 01:12 AM
  #2  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
yes.

port plates would be a neat idea though. take away all the dead space at the top of the port. reduce turbulence, increase flow, decrease volume = much much much higher efficiency.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 01:46 AM
  #3  
Zulu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Originally posted by peejay
yes.

port plates would be a neat idea though. take away all the dead space at the top of the port. reduce turbulence, increase flow, decrease volume = much much much higher efficiency.
sounds like something to look into
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 09:39 AM
  #4  
WackyRotary's Avatar
standard combustion
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities Minnesota
That is sooo funny, that sounds like you want to port a engine that is together. LOL!!!!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 11:58 AM
  #5  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
Originally posted by WackyRotary
That is sooo funny, that sounds like you want to port a engine that is together. LOL!!!!
That is what he meant. He new to this, it's a fair question that even I had many years ago.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 12:01 PM
  #6  
Hyper4mance2k's Avatar
The Shadetree Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,301
Likes: 3
From: District of Columbia
so wants the deally can you port an engine thats togather?? i didn't think so... can you??
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 12:10 PM
  #7  
jeremy's Avatar
male stripper
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 1
From: St Petersburg, FL
if you have room for a magnet and want to chance not getting all the shavings i guess you could try.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 12:14 PM
  #8  
Zulu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
haha, k I'll pass
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 12:23 PM
  #9  
WackyRotary's Avatar
standard combustion
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities Minnesota
if you have room for a magnet and want to chance not getting all the shavings i guess you could try.

Good luck trying to correctly conture the inner rotor housing surface of the exhuast port from the outside with a dye grinder. Oh yeah, a magnet won't do any good with aluminum of the exhuast port.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 01:25 PM
  #10  
coldy13's Avatar
Yeah, shutup kid.
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 2
From: Columbus, OH
Maybe if you have a really strong vacuume cleaner.... I would never try to port it when its together. Also, from what I understand the intake ports are the ones that are more restricting anyway.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 01:29 PM
  #11  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
No, it's the exhaust that are more restrictive. The cross section changes so radically and in such a short distance that it intorduces hellacious turbulence. Mazda probably did this on purpose, so it'd be all nice and turbulent in the exhaust port so injected air has a better chance of meeting unburned fuel.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 06:23 PM
  #12  
Sterling's Avatar
Nikki-Modder Rex-Rodder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 14
From: Trying to convince some clown not to put a Holley 600 on his 12a.
Originally posted by WackyRotary
That is sooo funny, that sounds like you want to port a engine that is together. LOL!!!!
Don't be an *******.
Twenty people each could come up with an idea, and 1 will be really great.
People like you keep them from wanting to share their ideas.

When you laugh at someone for asking a question, you impede the progress of our collective brainstorming here.

We all lose out.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 07:30 PM
  #13  
Zulu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Well, my limited experience with the wankel causes me to still be afraid of it, so, asking questions is good.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 07:34 PM
  #14  
jeremy's Avatar
male stripper
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 1
From: St Petersburg, FL
you said with the wankel. uh huh huh huh huh.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2002 | 07:35 PM
  #15  
Defprun's Avatar
Punk Ass Bitch
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Welland, Ontario
I'm still not sure of the whole process of porting yet. But I will know exactly how a Bridge port will be done...ill watch the whole process at my shop!!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
Oct 1, 2015 11:53 PM
dexter snoek
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
Sep 29, 2015 09:18 AM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
Sep 28, 2015 04:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.