1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Spring Rates (Standard Springs vs 2.5" ID Springs)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 06:32 PM
  #1  
Spinner-D(eluxe)'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Woodinville, WA
Question Spring Rates (Standard Springs vs 2.5" ID Springs)

I have been doing a little research to clarify some confusion I am encountering with spring rates. It is my understanding that you cannot compare spring rates of standard (stock strut size springs) with 2.5" I.D. Race Springs. Is this true?

If so is there a conversion formula to compare "ride feel" on different type springs? For Example would a Racing Beat Front spring of 145# spring compare to a 2.5" ID 7" spring at 250#? THere must be a difference, because standard springs are more than 7" or 8" tall which is a common length for an ID race spring, so the higher spring rate makes sence, because more pounds are required to compress the spring an inch.

Am I making any sence? I am confused? Someone please Help. The reason I am wondering is because I just ordered a set of Ground Control Camber Caster Plates, with the weld in Coil Over Kit. I didn't know which spring rate to get so they recommended a 7" 250# spring, as I told them I had Racing beat 110# springs in the rear.

THanks for any help,

Spinner-D
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 12:37 PM
  #2  
slowautoxr's Avatar
autoxr/rallyxr
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 542
Likes: 8
From: Decatur, AL
The original springs are progressive. That means that they have a spring rate that changes dependant on the amount of deflection. Generally they're softer initially and then they get stiffer. Coil over springs are linear. They're the same rate regardless of deflection. I just measured my front springs (RE from days gone by) and they measured about 125# once they got into the linear range. I assume that the RB springs measure 145# once they get into the linear range.

I'm right in the middle of a suspension revision on my '84 RX-7 as well. I'm still trying to decide on spring rates myself. A friend is letting me borrow some 275# springs for the front. I still need to figure out what I need to do on the back.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 02:52 PM
  #3  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
For 1st gens generally you want your rear spring rates to be less than half the front. I use 350 front 150 rear on the blue bridgeport.

There are lots of variables. What type of lateral axel locator, bushings, do you like a tail-happy car? etc.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 04:35 PM
  #4  
Spinner-D(eluxe)'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Woodinville, WA
ok I got my question answered on the Suspension forum, and thanks for your input also.

My set up is going to be 250# in front and 110# in back with TOkico Illumina 5-ways and my tires are Kumho Ecsta V700 in size 225/45-15 and for auto x I have the same tires at 235/45-13 on 15x8" rims. I usually run about 32lbs-35lbs of tire pressure, and favor a little oversteer rather than understeer.

What do you think of this setup? Common? Good or Bad?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 04:35 PM
  #5  
Spinner-D(eluxe)'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Woodinville, WA
ok I got my question answered on the Suspension forum, and thanks for your input also.

My set up is going to be 250# in front and 110# in back with TOkico Illumina 5-ways and my tires are Kumho Ecsta V700 in size 225/45-15 and for auto x I have the same tires at 235/45-13 on 15x8" rims. I usually run about 32l-35lbs of tire pressure, and favor a little oversteer rather than understeer.

What do you think of this setup? Common? Good or Bad?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #6  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
Sounds like a winner. Be prepared to try different rate rear springs. On my 7 125lbs had understeer, scrubbed the tires on corner exit. And 150 was just right; just a hair of oversteer. 25LBS made a world of difference.

Last edited by DriveFast7; Feb 11, 2004 at 05:13 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 05:53 PM
  #7  
Spinner-D(eluxe)'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Woodinville, WA
Originally posted by DriveFast7
Sounds like a winner. Be prepared to try different rate rear springs. On my 7 125lbs had understeer, scrubbed the tires on corner exit. And 150 was just right; just a hair of oversteer. 25LBS made a world of difference.
How much negative camber are you running, and caster if you know it? DO you have any rubbing problems on the front fenders?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #8  
rx7gslse's Avatar
EX Pres of DFW Drunks
Tenured Member: 25 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 1
From: DFW, TX/Mexico
350# front 150# rear here....

I love the way it handles.. (but I'm still running the stock front bar)

Illumas & CC plates too
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 06:54 PM
  #9  
rx7gslse's Avatar
EX Pres of DFW Drunks
Tenured Member: 25 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 1
From: DFW, TX/Mexico
350# front 150# rear here....

I love the way it handles.. (but I'm still running the stock front bar)

Illumas & CC plates too
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Postman09
Introduce yourself
3
Sep 29, 2015 11:34 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.