1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Spring Rates (Standard Springs vs 2.5" ID Springs)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-04, 06:32 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Spinner-D(eluxe)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Spring Rates (Standard Springs vs 2.5" ID Springs)

I have been doing a little research to clarify some confusion I am encountering with spring rates. It is my understanding that you cannot compare spring rates of standard (stock strut size springs) with 2.5" I.D. Race Springs. Is this true?

If so is there a conversion formula to compare "ride feel" on different type springs? For Example would a Racing Beat Front spring of 145# spring compare to a 2.5" ID 7" spring at 250#? THere must be a difference, because standard springs are more than 7" or 8" tall which is a common length for an ID race spring, so the higher spring rate makes sence, because more pounds are required to compress the spring an inch.

Am I making any sence? I am confused? Someone please Help. The reason I am wondering is because I just ordered a set of Ground Control Camber Caster Plates, with the weld in Coil Over Kit. I didn't know which spring rate to get so they recommended a 7" 250# spring, as I told them I had Racing beat 110# springs in the rear.

THanks for any help,

Spinner-D
Old 02-11-04, 12:37 PM
  #2  
autoxr/rallyxr

iTrader: (6)
 
slowautoxr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
The original springs are progressive. That means that they have a spring rate that changes dependant on the amount of deflection. Generally they're softer initially and then they get stiffer. Coil over springs are linear. They're the same rate regardless of deflection. I just measured my front springs (RE from days gone by) and they measured about 125# once they got into the linear range. I assume that the RB springs measure 145# once they get into the linear range.

I'm right in the middle of a suspension revision on my '84 RX-7 as well. I'm still trying to decide on spring rates myself. A friend is letting me borrow some 275# springs for the front. I still need to figure out what I need to do on the back.
Old 02-11-04, 02:52 PM
  #3  
Blood, Sweat and Rotors

iTrader: (1)
 
DriveFast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,742
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For 1st gens generally you want your rear spring rates to be less than half the front. I use 350 front 150 rear on the blue bridgeport.

There are lots of variables. What type of lateral axel locator, bushings, do you like a tail-happy car? etc.
Old 02-11-04, 04:35 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Spinner-D(eluxe)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok I got my question answered on the Suspension forum, and thanks for your input also.

My set up is going to be 250# in front and 110# in back with TOkico Illumina 5-ways and my tires are Kumho Ecsta V700 in size 225/45-15 and for auto x I have the same tires at 235/45-13 on 15x8" rims. I usually run about 32lbs-35lbs of tire pressure, and favor a little oversteer rather than understeer.

What do you think of this setup? Common? Good or Bad?
Old 02-11-04, 04:35 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Spinner-D(eluxe)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok I got my question answered on the Suspension forum, and thanks for your input also.

My set up is going to be 250# in front and 110# in back with TOkico Illumina 5-ways and my tires are Kumho Ecsta V700 in size 225/45-15 and for auto x I have the same tires at 235/45-13 on 15x8" rims. I usually run about 32l-35lbs of tire pressure, and favor a little oversteer rather than understeer.

What do you think of this setup? Common? Good or Bad?
Old 02-11-04, 04:45 PM
  #6  
Blood, Sweat and Rotors

iTrader: (1)
 
DriveFast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,742
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds like a winner. Be prepared to try different rate rear springs. On my 7 125lbs had understeer, scrubbed the tires on corner exit. And 150 was just right; just a hair of oversteer. 25LBS made a world of difference.

Last edited by DriveFast7; 02-11-04 at 05:13 PM.
Old 02-11-04, 05:53 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Spinner-D(eluxe)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DriveFast7
Sounds like a winner. Be prepared to try different rate rear springs. On my 7 125lbs had understeer, scrubbed the tires on corner exit. And 150 was just right; just a hair of oversteer. 25LBS made a world of difference.
How much negative camber are you running, and caster if you know it? DO you have any rubbing problems on the front fenders?
Old 02-11-04, 06:49 PM
  #8  
EX Pres of DFW Drunks

 
rx7gslse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: DFW, TX/Mexico
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
350# front 150# rear here....

I love the way it handles.. (but I'm still running the stock front bar)

Illumas & CC plates too
Old 02-11-04, 06:54 PM
  #9  
EX Pres of DFW Drunks

 
rx7gslse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: DFW, TX/Mexico
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
350# front 150# rear here....

I love the way it handles.. (but I'm still running the stock front bar)

Illumas & CC plates too
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Postman09
Introduce yourself
3
09-29-15 11:34 AM



Quick Reply: Spring Rates (Standard Springs vs 2.5" ID Springs)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.