1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Question about Prolong engine treatment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-05, 10:55 PM
  #1  
Beware Of Squirrely Wrath

Thread Starter
 
BrianHeston's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Question about Prolong engine treatment

I found one thread when I searched that said prolong is bad for our cars. It didn't, however, give any reasons as to why. I'm wondering if prolong has actually been tested in our cars. The only reason that I could think that it would cause a problem, is if it doesn't burn properly when injected into the combustion chamber. Does anyone have any detailed info on this?

Thank you,

Brian Heston
Old 03-18-05, 11:14 PM
  #2  
How About A Cup Of STFU

 
DAVID GRIMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ALBANY, GA
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Read this.
http://www.ftc.gov/os/1999/09/pslcmp.htm


But FWIW, I put slick 50 ( back in the day ) in my stock 12A and it was running strong at 140,000 miles when I did the 13B swap.
Old 03-19-05, 10:53 AM
  #3  
Beware Of Squirrely Wrath

Thread Starter
 
BrianHeston's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, the FTC got wind that the tests they refered to and allegedly demonstrated on their video may have been false, but does the product actually work? How did Prolong respond to the allegations? Have they performed these tests at this point to prove the FTC wrong? If you have any of these answers, I'd love to hear them, but I guess I'll have to do a lot of searching and book work myself too. Thanks for the help so far.

Also, on a related note, I see that you are using a synthetic blend oil in the engine, and full sythetic in the rear end and tranny I'm assuming. Out of curiousity, how long have you been doing this without adverse results?

Thanks,
Brian Heston
Old 03-19-05, 11:01 AM
  #4  
I hate because I'm bored.

 
comradegiant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My friend ran his engine for close to 70 miles with absolutely no engine oil. He has an 88 GTU. It still runs. So dispite what the FTC might say I use ProLong.
Old 03-19-05, 03:48 PM
  #5  
The AUTO DOCTOR

 
BadAssRX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: South Side of ATL. Ga.
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the only thing i have against any of this junk is if you read the warrenty they list what they will replace.... and its all piston motor parts not a single rotor part. and after emailing them all i got was a reply saying that they would replace what is listed in the warrenty
Old 03-19-05, 05:11 PM
  #6  
Leave A Message

 
GavinJuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MN
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
prolong was a scam, i remember being told a long time ago that it was based off old technology. When it came out it was essentially nothing "new". I remember watching the infomercials where they would drop the oil pan and spray the bottom of the engine with a hose, or drain the oil and drive it for umteen miles. Everyone was so amazed! i was told that it was actually banned in somes states?
Old 03-19-05, 09:49 PM
  #7  
How About A Cup Of STFU

 
DAVID GRIMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ALBANY, GA
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BrianHeston
So, the FTC got wind that the tests they refered to and allegedly demonstrated on their video may have been false, but does the product actually work? How did Prolong respond to the allegations? Have they performed these tests at this point to prove the FTC wrong? If you have any of these answers, I'd love to hear them, but I guess I'll have to do a lot of searching and book work myself too. Thanks for the help so far.

Also, on a related note, I see that you are using a synthetic blend oil in the engine, and full sythetic in the rear end and tranny I'm assuming. Out of curiousity, how long have you been doing this without adverse results?

Thanks,
Brian Heston

14 years. I started out with Mobil 1 in the crankcase. tranny and rearend since '95.
Old 03-19-05, 11:37 PM
  #8  
Rotary Freak

 
Aviator 902S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
14 years. I started out with Mobil 1 in the crankcase. tranny and rearend since '95.
Are you running the stock omp, or do you premix and have a block-off plate where the omp used to be?
Old 03-19-05, 11:52 PM
  #9  
How About A Cup Of STFU

 
DAVID GRIMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ALBANY, GA
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stock omp setup now. Plan to change to 2-cycle pump from rotaryaviation later this year, though.

From everything I've experienced, seen, and read...the only thing I want to change lube-wise is the burning of 4-cycle oil ( dino or synthetic ).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
EDomokos
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
06-04-22 08:29 PM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
08-15-15 01:38 PM



Quick Reply: Question about Prolong engine treatment



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.