1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Non-Return type fuel system possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #1  
Pele's Avatar
Thread Starter
Right near Malloy
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,855
Likes: 517
From: Behind a workbench, repairing FC Electronics.
Non-Return type fuel system possible?

So people usually use the stock return line for fuel supply when upgrading and they have to remove the stock fuel source line and put in a totally new return.

I was wondering if it were possible to have a returnless system with the FPR back by the pump.

I've read on power steering systems, when the pressure is not needed/too great, the pump internally bypasses so that it just circulates the fluid inside itself and the impeller effectively moves nothing. This theory shouldn't be too hard to translate over to a fuel system, should it?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #2  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
There are a few aftermarket pumps that run in cyles, as needed. The downside to this design is the pressure can fluctuate, and the pump's life is not as long, due to stopping/starting.
I don't know of any pumps that actually bypass internally, but they may exist.
The idea of putting a FPR closer to the tank, and running the return from there has one disadvantage. It would be a little harder to access, in the event it needed adjusted.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #3  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by Pele
So people usually use the stock return line for fuel supply when upgrading and they have to remove the stock fuel source line and put in a totally new return.

I was wondering if it were possible to have a returnless system with the FPR back by the pump.

I've read on power steering systems, when the pressure is not needed/too great, the pump internally bypasses so that it just circulates the fluid inside itself and the impeller effectively moves nothing. This theory shouldn't be too hard to translate over to a fuel system, should it?
Carb or EFI?

Most carb systems are returnless. Return-type carb setups are just to prevent vapor lock, unlikely in an electric pump setup anyway. (You always want the regulator as close as possible to the carb!)

EFI, lots of new cars have returnless systems where the regulator is in the pump assembly or the pump is pulsewidth modulated by the computer and there's no regulator (yikes!). It's purely an emissions thing, to keep the fuel from getting hot from circulating through the engine bay, and thus evaporate faster and contribute to evaporative pollution.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 06:47 PM
  #4  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
I was gonna say, my RX-7 (was) and my Toyota are both running Carter pumps with Holley regulators and no return lines, lol. Theyre both carbed with Webers though too, lol

~T.J.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #5  
lovintha7's Avatar
Suicidal Death Missile
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Virginia
You're right that they bypass, but they normall go back to the fuel tank. Normally this is an in-tank pump. If you look at pump dynamics, a vane pump is a positive displacement pump. It will pump a fixed amount of liquid or gas per cycle. If you don't have a bypass you'll blow something up. If the bypass goes from the discharge side to the suction side, the fluid and pump have a tendency to overheat. This is not a good thing in your case.

When I ran my Holley from RB, it had no return line. The thing that keeps them from not overheating is you will be using fuel, so the "hot" fuel will move out of the pump relatively quickly, so overheating isn't much of a concern.

I personally like return systems. It gives the tank a chance to mix up the 2 cycle oil.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #6  
Sterling's Avatar
Nikki-Modder Rex-Rodder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 14
From: Trying to convince some clown not to put a Holley 600 on his 12a.
I'll hazard a guess that the biggest differece between the power steering system and a fuel delivery system's location of pressure regulator is that fuel can vaporize and also compress. (?)
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 10:23 PM
  #7  
Pele's Avatar
Thread Starter
Right near Malloy
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,855
Likes: 517
From: Behind a workbench, repairing FC Electronics.
Originally Posted by lovintha7
I personally like return systems. It gives the tank a chance to mix up the 2 cycle oil.
Ah, there's another thing. I'd never run premix as my primary seal lube system.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 03:09 AM
  #8  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
I was forced into premixing and now I think I'm starting to like it. It's on an EFI system with a return line. Yes, I'm sure the 2 cycle oil is getting mixed nicely.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 03:55 AM
  #9  
jays83gsl's Avatar
1983 GSL, 1987 323 "GX"
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 0
From: Las Cruces, NM
OMP never worked, so Premix I must!
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 08:33 AM
  #10  
Pele's Avatar
Thread Starter
Right near Malloy
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,855
Likes: 517
From: Behind a workbench, repairing FC Electronics.
I like the OMP with an adapter plate and seperate reservoir idea.

I can patch a float into the unused "Windshield washer fluid low" light. Seeing as how my WIndshield washer reservoir doesnt have a level switch anymore. (I needed a larger one in my truck to get more mud off the windshield and I thought I could do with a smaller one in the 7 for weight savings... Not surprisingly, they were both compatible, so I swapped em. The truck one didn't have a level sensor though.)

It's nice having compatible vehicles. Batteries can be fenagled (reverse cables) to work in eachother. The truck uses an S5 RX-7 alternator... Little crap like that.

Last edited by Pele; Jul 22, 2005 at 08:36 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
82streetracer
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Aug 23, 2015 09:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.