1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Locked distributors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2003 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
RX7ZOOM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, Australia
Locked distributors

I have disconnected the vacuum advance on my dizzy and have lost a heap of torque down low. Have heard about locking the dizzy. What is this exactly? Is it advantagous? How is it done?

Regards, Pete.
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 08:03 PM
  #2  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
If you remove the top of the dizzy (look in the shop manual), theres a pair of weights and springs, thats your centrifugal advance. If you remove the springs and tack weld the weights fully out your timing will be locked (assuming you keep the vac advance disconnected). Racers do this to simplify the dizzy (less stuff to break).
Reply
Old May 27, 2003 | 10:02 PM
  #3  
WackyRotary's Avatar
standard combustion
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities Minnesota
You need to lock the distrubuter if you run a blow through setup otherwise it will be a dog a low rpm. I also agree its a good mod for those who want to simplify things. And you retain max advance at lower rpm with the throttle opened up to produce more torque. I think more people should do this since it is a really cheap easy mod to do.

I used it on my bridgeport for a little while and did notice a little more lowend(if you consider 3000rpm low) I locked it for my blowthrough turbo.
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 03:49 AM
  #4  
KYPREO's Avatar
www.AusRotary.com
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 905
Likes: 272
From: Melbourne, Australia
with the vacuum advance, its not that you are losing torque down low in the rev range, its that you are losing torque on light throttle application/low load. because the timing effectively becomes retarded by 7.5 degrees. the timing split also changes with vacuum advance, becoming a 7.5 degree split under low load.

Unless you have a ported engine, why not keep all the vacuum advance and centrifugal advance connected? I've tried both and the stock setup is way better for fuel economy and torque on low throttle. I would only lock the timing for reliability reasons when you are running a lot of advance, eg bridgeport application.

Unless someone else can tell me otherwise?
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 08:31 AM
  #5  
WackyRotary's Avatar
standard combustion
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities Minnesota
Well when ever you get on the throttle below 4000rpm, you lose your vacuum advance and that causes it to bog some. Vacuum advance is good for light throttle only since it advances timing beyond mechanical at low engine loads and thus helps with MPG. But going to full throttle with a un-locked distrubuter hurts lowend since the advance is retarded(since vacuum is 0) and don't get the max advance again till 4000rpm.

So with a locked distrubuter, you got max advance and don't use the vacuum source anymore. Get the good MPG and lowend response a locked will provide.
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 01:40 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 2
From: North Atlanta, GA
I need to do that also, when i try to set timing with the timing light, the marks keep on jumping back and forth sometimes. I was told that if you don't have msd boxes a locked dizzy would cure that.

So basically i need to take the dizzy apart and make sure that the weights don't move? Do i need to adjust them or something before i weld them?
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 02:22 PM
  #7  
Pedestrian X's Avatar
SpAz!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
From: CA
yes, adjust them all the way out.
Reply
Old May 28, 2003 | 09:04 PM
  #8  
KYPREO's Avatar
www.AusRotary.com
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 905
Likes: 272
From: Melbourne, Australia
thanks whacky...that makes sense. so basically the extra 10-15 degrees locked advance below 3000rpm more or low compensates the extra advance you would have had at low engine loads.

12abp: if you're timing point is jumping, make sure the inductive pickup is not close to the trailing, when you are measuring leading and vice versa. The timing light might also be shitty.

The timing point should only move when you hope on the throttle and/or the revs lift (up to 3000rpm).
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 11:33 AM
  #9  
Wankelguy's Avatar
My FSP Fiesta eats Jettas
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 3
You'll need to set the timing to max advance at about 6000 rpm. Then, you'll end up being a bit too advanced at lower rpms, but that's the trade-off.
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 04:35 PM
  #10  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Funny my good (read $$$$) timing light picks up the trailing spark, but my $10 Wal-Mart one works great. Go figure.
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 10:20 PM
  #11  
KYPREO's Avatar
www.AusRotary.com
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 905
Likes: 272
From: Melbourne, Australia
My cheap Kmart one is great too lol
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 10:29 PM
  #12  
Suparslinc's Avatar
It's Back!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati
I've been running without the vacuum advance on a stock engine with a modified carb, and I do notice my gas mileage is down. Maybe I'll go back to stock now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coochas
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
10
Oct 3, 2015 04:49 AM
rx7inoregon
Old School and Other Rotary
5
Oct 1, 2015 12:44 PM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
Sep 28, 2015 04:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 AM.