1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Highway cruising RPM difference between 4.10 and 4.30 gears

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2018 | 01:32 PM
  #1  
racerx01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 225
Likes: 19
From: Louisville, KY
Highway cruising RPM difference between 4.10 and 4.30 gears

Planning a GSL rear axle swap. Want to install lower gear set at same time. Going into a 85GS FB with FC S4 trans and "fat" Nikki carb. Car has stock port 12A.

Looking for opinion on the highway cruise RPM / gas mileage between 3.91, 4.10, and 4.30. Is there a significant autoX/track performance difference between ratios?

Car is not a DD, but gets driven to autoX, track, and rotary car meets so highway performance is important.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2018 | 02:11 PM
  #2  
t_g_farrell's Avatar
Waffles - hmmm good
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,250
Likes: 464
From: Lake Wylie, N.C.
With the stock setup on my SA (3.9 rear) the cruising rpm for 80MPH is 4000 rpm exactly, 75MPH is about 3500 rpm and 65MPH is ~3000 rpm. I know this because my speedo is off slightly due to age and tire size.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2018 | 03:30 PM
  #3  
GSLSEforme's Avatar
ancient wizard...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 262
From: Maryland
Rough guess with 4.30 rear gear 5k rpm at 80,with current trans 5th gear ratio. Would have to look into S4 gearset specs but recall them having a lower numerical 5th gear like SE did as they're behind a 13B with more torque and power than a 12A. Might be able to run the 4.30 gearset with the overdrive of S4 box,certainly wouldn't be as bad as 12A box. If you already have S4 box,i'd go with 4.10 ratio. What size are tires(circumference) on back of car,will also affect final drive ratio.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2018 | 04:12 PM
  #4  
RA12124's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 68
If autox and track is your goal, do the following: Drive down the highway in 4th gear right now.

Is that acceptable fuel mileage and noise level for you? If no, don't do anything.

If yes, find yourself a used NA Miata gear box and swap those gears into your transmission. Then get a Kia Sportage rear diff with 4.77 gears to put in your rear end. This will give you identical 1st and 2nd gear that you have now (because miata 1st and 2nd are pretty tall), and then it will compress 3rd, 4th, and 5th into your current span between 3rd and 4th. It's the best ratio you're gonna get for the track with a N/A 12a, and will keep you out of the lower revs. Around town, you'll basically be driving in 5th gear. If you don't do the miata gears, any of the different final drives you pick are going to make 1st and 2nd really short (not so good for autox).
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2018 | 08:45 PM
  #5  
KYPREO's Avatar
www.AusRotary.com
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 905
Likes: 273
From: Melbourne, Australia
Many years ago I created a spreadsheet that allows you to input different gearing and tyre size to determine the effect on speedometer error, cruising speed etc.

See here: Wheel Sizing, Gearing, and Speedometer Spreadsheet - AusRotary

FWIW, my advice is to go shorter than that. You want at least 4.44 for a stock 12A. They need all the help they can get to get up and boogie. When I switched from 3.9 to 4.44 on my stock 12A, I was able to finally able to chirp the tyres between gears and cruise uphill without gearing down so often. For me, fuel consumption actually went down slightly, even after taking into account odometer correction, most likely due to the fact far less throttle was required under all conditions. But you may find yourself using driving a bit harder as it is much tempter to rev out in each gear.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2018 | 11:17 PM
  #6  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
i believe the mileage claim, my old 79 would get better mileage in the 3500-4000rpm range than in the 3000-3500rpm range, shorter gears would put it in the better rpm range at a slightly lower mph.

interestingly the Rx8 was like this too, it would get better mpg at 80 than at 65...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fastrx7man
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
Oct 17, 2005 09:32 PM
mr_sunshine
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
May 29, 2005 04:16 AM
CCarlisi
20B Forum
10
Jan 16, 2005 06:35 PM
GoodfellaFD3S
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
13
Sep 15, 2004 01:09 PM
uRizen
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
34
Jul 21, 2004 07:00 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.