Camber issue, pic inside!
#1
RX-7 DISCIPLE
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NorCal,California
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Camber issue, pic inside!
Background:
Was taking a left turn pretty hard trying to beat a light. Had the foot on the gas and started to spin out.
Cars left front tire hit the CURB hard as the car was spinning out to the left and hopped on top of the island (4 feet wide Maybe a 8-10 inch curb). The whole car then proceeded to hop over the island. I landed on the opposite side of the street facing oncoming traffic. Quickly started her up and drove to safety.
quickly right after I drove to safety I noticed the cars alignment was off drastically. (of course) . I inspected the steering components and bought new outer tie rods noticing the front left was bent. The brake rotor was also bent. Bought new brakes and bearings for both sides.
The new tie rods helped a lot. Steering returned back to center on its own, but the car still veered right.
Just took it to a alignment shop and this is the results....
The tech said the camber was off too much on the front left. He did the best he could. The car still veers right and is A LITTLE BETTER than before. He also said in accidents like mine, usually its the lower control arm or knuckle? that gets bent.
I proceeded to inspect my left side LCA and noticed the bushing was busted on that side. I have a new one on the way.
What I wanna know is can anyone point me to other possible steering components that could have been damaged that I should look at?
THANKS TO ALL ADVICE AND REPLIES!
CLIFFS: hit curb hard with driver front tire during a spin out
alignment jacked up, replaced tie rods, did alignment, driver camber still off,
car still veers right.
need help with which parts to replace?
DIAGRAM shows adjusments
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Was taking a left turn pretty hard trying to beat a light. Had the foot on the gas and started to spin out.
Cars left front tire hit the CURB hard as the car was spinning out to the left and hopped on top of the island (4 feet wide Maybe a 8-10 inch curb). The whole car then proceeded to hop over the island. I landed on the opposite side of the street facing oncoming traffic. Quickly started her up and drove to safety.
quickly right after I drove to safety I noticed the cars alignment was off drastically. (of course) . I inspected the steering components and bought new outer tie rods noticing the front left was bent. The brake rotor was also bent. Bought new brakes and bearings for both sides.
The new tie rods helped a lot. Steering returned back to center on its own, but the car still veered right.
Just took it to a alignment shop and this is the results....
The tech said the camber was off too much on the front left. He did the best he could. The car still veers right and is A LITTLE BETTER than before. He also said in accidents like mine, usually its the lower control arm or knuckle? that gets bent.
I proceeded to inspect my left side LCA and noticed the bushing was busted on that side. I have a new one on the way.
What I wanna know is can anyone point me to other possible steering components that could have been damaged that I should look at?
THANKS TO ALL ADVICE AND REPLIES!
CLIFFS: hit curb hard with driver front tire during a spin out
alignment jacked up, replaced tie rods, did alignment, driver camber still off,
car still veers right.
need help with which parts to replace?
DIAGRAM shows adjusments
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,819
Received 2,590 Likes
on
1,839 Posts
lol, it'll handle better with negative camber, so slide into a curb on the other side!
if you're hunting for bent parts, its probably a bent strut/spindle (its one piece), although you should look at the lower control arm bolt, and the lower control arm too, its really easy to get out of the car
if you're hunting for bent parts, its probably a bent strut/spindle (its one piece), although you should look at the lower control arm bolt, and the lower control arm too, its really easy to get out of the car
#3
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
The idiot that aligned your car is obviously from Firestone. They have messed up my tires countless times. Here's what you do when you go back in and ask for your car to be fixed PROPERLY:
SIT in the car during the alignment and have the fuel level 1/2 way. If they make you wear safety glasses and press on the brake/turn the wheel, so be it, but you ARE sitting in that car.
Camber: -1.0 was excellent for Daily Driving
Toe: -0.05 OUT
Caster: As much as you can get ~ 4 Degrees
Don't let some moron with a job tell you "Green is Good." It's not. They are uneducated in the fine arts of suspension geometry and tuning. If they don't do it, demand your money back and go elsewhere.
SIT in the car during the alignment and have the fuel level 1/2 way. If they make you wear safety glasses and press on the brake/turn the wheel, so be it, but you ARE sitting in that car.
Camber: -1.0 was excellent for Daily Driving
Toe: -0.05 OUT
Caster: As much as you can get ~ 4 Degrees
Don't let some moron with a job tell you "Green is Good." It's not. They are uneducated in the fine arts of suspension geometry and tuning. If they don't do it, demand your money back and go elsewhere.
#4
RX-7 DISCIPLE
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NorCal,California
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The idiot that aligned your car is obviously from Firestone. They have messed up my tires countless times. Here's what you do when you go back in and ask for your car to be fixed PROPERLY:
SIT in the car during the alignment and have the fuel level 1/2 way. If they make you wear safety glasses and press on the brake/turn the wheel, so be it, but you ARE sitting in that car.
Camber: -1.0 was excellent for Daily Driving
Toe: -0.05 OUT
Caster: As much as you can get ~ 4 Degrees
Don't let some moron with a job tell you "Green is Good." It's not. They are uneducated in the fine arts of suspension geometry and tuning. If they don't do it, demand your money back and go elsewhere.
SIT in the car during the alignment and have the fuel level 1/2 way. If they make you wear safety glasses and press on the brake/turn the wheel, so be it, but you ARE sitting in that car.
Camber: -1.0 was excellent for Daily Driving
Toe: -0.05 OUT
Caster: As much as you can get ~ 4 Degrees
Don't let some moron with a job tell you "Green is Good." It's not. They are uneducated in the fine arts of suspension geometry and tuning. If they don't do it, demand your money back and go elsewhere.
Well the steering veers right and I have to hold the wheel left.
Another important bit, he said the left side camber MAXES out at -0.1 and wont adjust anymore.
#5
RX-7 DISCIPLE
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NorCal,California
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol, it'll handle better with negative camber, so slide into a curb on the other side!
if you're hunting for bent parts, its probably a bent strut/spindle (its one piece), although you should look at the lower control arm bolt, and the lower control arm too, its really easy to get out of the car
if you're hunting for bent parts, its probably a bent strut/spindle (its one piece), although you should look at the lower control arm bolt, and the lower control arm too, its really easy to get out of the car
And im gonna have to check out the bottom of the strut...
#6
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
When he said "MAXES" he meant in the positive direction. This further proves my point of an incompetent shop. Negative camber is what you need. You came in with -1.0 which is okay, but -0.1 is NOT.
Veering is 90% toe angle related, and by looking at yours you can easily read that. Those numbers should be equal from side to side with you IN the car as I described earlier. The other 10% is split between camber and caster imbalance, but definitely not as critical in a RWD car. When FWD cars have an imbalance in caster, they pull during torque-steer occurrences (heavy throttle application).
Trending Topics
#8
premix, for f's sake
iTrader: (6)
Something is for sure bent or heavily shifted, and the affect it will have on how the car drives mirrors exactly what your alignment spec printout is showing, before and after. So, I don't know what "sirlaughsalot" is trying to say/imply. That print out sheet has nothing to do with the shop that did the alignment, that is the print out gotten from a hunter alignment machine, which many shops have, and is considered the best alignment computer/system in the industry.
Every vehicle has a different camber, caster and toe spec, as assigned by engineers and manufacturers who made the vehicle... no "1 magical" spec works for everything...
1. camber/caster is individually adjustable by rotating our strut top. this only achieves roughly a +/- of .5degrees of camber and/or caster, and can obviously only be adjusted in 4 positions. you camber/caster was indeed corrected to the best of the technicians ability given the allowed factory adjustments
2. As a general rule of thumb, ANYTHING OVER .5 DEGREES OF CROSS CAMBER WILL CAUSE A PULL, PULL WILL BE TO THE SIDE MORE POSITIVE, which is exactly what is being showed via your alignment specs
3. Cross caster will rarely cause a pull, as caster is not a wearing angle, in a daily driving sense, it will have the most affect on steering wheel return to center after a turn. in terms of your alignment sheet, a sacrifice had to be made to get the more important driveability/wear angle (camber) back in spec, as a trade off, putting a minor affect angle (caster) out
by looking at the print out, i would say you either have a bent lower control arm or a shifted subframe, perhaps a bent steering knuckle (but it would put that after the first 2)
Every vehicle has a different camber, caster and toe spec, as assigned by engineers and manufacturers who made the vehicle... no "1 magical" spec works for everything...
1. camber/caster is individually adjustable by rotating our strut top. this only achieves roughly a +/- of .5degrees of camber and/or caster, and can obviously only be adjusted in 4 positions. you camber/caster was indeed corrected to the best of the technicians ability given the allowed factory adjustments
2. As a general rule of thumb, ANYTHING OVER .5 DEGREES OF CROSS CAMBER WILL CAUSE A PULL, PULL WILL BE TO THE SIDE MORE POSITIVE, which is exactly what is being showed via your alignment specs
3. Cross caster will rarely cause a pull, as caster is not a wearing angle, in a daily driving sense, it will have the most affect on steering wheel return to center after a turn. in terms of your alignment sheet, a sacrifice had to be made to get the more important driveability/wear angle (camber) back in spec, as a trade off, putting a minor affect angle (caster) out
by looking at the print out, i would say you either have a bent lower control arm or a shifted subframe, perhaps a bent steering knuckle (but it would put that after the first 2)
#9
Waffles - hmmm good
iTrader: (1)
You definitely bent something evidence by the broken control arm bushing as you stated.
You could have a bent/broken:
1. control arm
2. strut assembly
3. ball joint
4. tierods ( which you already verified )
5. Torsion rod ( attaches from the from frame to the control arm )
6. Frame member might be bent ( need to verify by measuring the frame points )
All of this may not just be on the left side that initially hit the curb. The right went over as well
and may have similiar damage.
One rule to keep in mind, if you replace it on one side, do the other so you can be sure you
can reduce the unknowns on both sides.
Wow! To bend a rotor implies a a fairly hard blow. You need to really go over everything under
the car and make sure its solid if you want it to drive right again.
You could have a bent/broken:
1. control arm
2. strut assembly
3. ball joint
4. tierods ( which you already verified )
5. Torsion rod ( attaches from the from frame to the control arm )
6. Frame member might be bent ( need to verify by measuring the frame points )
All of this may not just be on the left side that initially hit the curb. The right went over as well
and may have similiar damage.
One rule to keep in mind, if you replace it on one side, do the other so you can be sure you
can reduce the unknowns on both sides.
Wow! To bend a rotor implies a a fairly hard blow. You need to really go over everything under
the car and make sure its solid if you want it to drive right again.
#10
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
When is the last time you had an alignment and part way through it something was bent? The initial settings are better, that's my point. An incompetent alignment tech can work on any rack and screw up, as shown here.
First get it realigned correctly. The tech should be able to see a fracture in the crystalline structure of whatever metal is tweaked or broken once the car is carefully examined on the lift.
First get it realigned correctly. The tech should be able to see a fracture in the crystalline structure of whatever metal is tweaked or broken once the car is carefully examined on the lift.
#11
premix, for f's sake
iTrader: (6)
^how were the before specs better?
the RF camber/caster are the same before and after, as nothing was changed and the toe was brought back in the dead center of allowable tolerance.
the LF was 1.5 degrees away from even being on the edge of factory allowable tolerance and the caster was a degree out. After the strut top was rotated to attempt to fix the camber/caster angles, the camber is now only .5 of a degree away, and the caster in dead on. That is the limit of which you can get from factory adjustments. and once again, this LF toe was adjusted dead nuts in the center of allowable tolerance
so in summary, we went brought the LF camber closer to spec by 1 degree, and LF caster back into spec, reduced cross camber and cross caster by a degree, and brought both LF and RF toe angles back into spec.
So once again, how was the before better in any way?
No one ever said that something all of a sudden got bent in the middle of an alignment, If a person brings there car to a shop and says "i want an alignment", whoever works on it isnt gonna go through and carefully examine and scrutinize every piece on the car. the vehicle will be racked and lifted, given a quick shake down to make sure there isnt a toasted ball joint or tierod, and then to the alignment rack it goes. Unless the customer specifically states they hit something and now the alignment is off, the tech will not look for bent parts
oh, and re-reading that the brake rotor itself was bent, and the fact that camber is currently the only angle thats still out, im kinda suspecting the spindle could be tweaked
the RF camber/caster are the same before and after, as nothing was changed and the toe was brought back in the dead center of allowable tolerance.
the LF was 1.5 degrees away from even being on the edge of factory allowable tolerance and the caster was a degree out. After the strut top was rotated to attempt to fix the camber/caster angles, the camber is now only .5 of a degree away, and the caster in dead on. That is the limit of which you can get from factory adjustments. and once again, this LF toe was adjusted dead nuts in the center of allowable tolerance
so in summary, we went brought the LF camber closer to spec by 1 degree, and LF caster back into spec, reduced cross camber and cross caster by a degree, and brought both LF and RF toe angles back into spec.
So once again, how was the before better in any way?
No one ever said that something all of a sudden got bent in the middle of an alignment, If a person brings there car to a shop and says "i want an alignment", whoever works on it isnt gonna go through and carefully examine and scrutinize every piece on the car. the vehicle will be racked and lifted, given a quick shake down to make sure there isnt a toasted ball joint or tierod, and then to the alignment rack it goes. Unless the customer specifically states they hit something and now the alignment is off, the tech will not look for bent parts
oh, and re-reading that the brake rotor itself was bent, and the fact that camber is currently the only angle thats still out, im kinda suspecting the spindle could be tweaked
#12
RX-7 DISCIPLE
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NorCal,California
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well additional bits I found out. The steering rubs when turned all the way left. Something is rubbing.
The shock tower adjustment on the left is also different than the right
The shock tower with the missing green cap is the driver.
Steering wheels is towards the left at rest.
Pictures are attached
The shock tower adjustment on the left is also different than the right
The shock tower with the missing green cap is the driver.
Steering wheels is towards the left at rest.
Pictures are attached
#13
RX-7 DISCIPLE
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NorCal,California
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Spindle is connected with the shock?
If I buy a new shock it comes with a new spindle ?
This sucks. Wanted to drive the FB to seven stock. Guess I'll be taking the FC
If I buy a new shock it comes with a new spindle ?
This sucks. Wanted to drive the FB to seven stock. Guess I'll be taking the FC
#15
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
The right side, while within factory specs, is worse off. Something is definitely bent however when you compare the shock towers and their resulting angles. According to the pics you would think the one missing the cap is the RIGHT side, while the one with all four green caps is the LEFT. This would yield those angles on a normal car...
Is that correct Ex-EG?
Is that correct Ex-EG?
#16
premix, for f's sake
iTrader: (6)
you are backwards. The strut top missing 1 green cap is the LEFT/driverside as you can see the fuseable link and FC leading coil, not to mention the other side u can see the charcoal canister and washer fluid jug, implying that the side with 4 green caps is the RIGHT side