1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Anyone with waffles and 50 series tires? Pros and cons.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 02:56 PM
  #1  
NCross's Avatar
Thread Starter
I have a rotary addiction
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 24
From: Columbia, Tennessee
Anyone with waffles and 50 series tires? Pros and cons.

I have a nice set of waffles in the attic that I might want to refinish. My problem is that I hate 70 series tires. The look and the performance. I was thinking of using them as autoX wheels so I don't burn up my nice tires on my Rotas.

Would the 195-50-13 tire be a noticeable in acceleration? Like installing a 4.88 gear maybe? It would have to lower the roll out of the wheels by quite a bit.

Anyone have pictures of waffles with thin track tires? BTW I'm lowered about 3 inches on REspeed coils.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 03:02 PM
  #2  
t_g_farrell's Avatar
Waffles - hmmm good
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,250
Likes: 464
From: Lake Wylie, N.C.
Pros:
- for autocross they might be the ticket for some types of courses

Cons:
- Will look really small on the car. Like roller skate wheels almost. Since your lowered
it might not be so bad.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 05:01 PM
  #3  
ray green's Avatar
Gone
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 11,442
Likes: 210
They will be very short fat tires. I had the Sunmitomo HTR 200 175/50/13's on the Silver One when I bought it, I hated them. They lowered the car, making it bottom out all the time and harder to get in and out. The look of the 50 series sidewall on a 13" rim is terrible, in my opinion, leaving big gaps in the wheel wells. These are really short tires.





Michael just came up with a nice looking 205/60/13, similar to the old Sumitomo HTR 200's with the RWL as a rare bonus:

http://ssl.delti.com/cgi-bin/rshop.p...&nichtweiter=1



It would be interesting to hear how they perform
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 09:35 PM
  #4  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
lol. That does look a little silly.

Try Sumitomo HTRwhatevertheyares in 215/50/13. That's what I've been running for a few years now. With the car lowred, it doesn't look bad at all. Speedometer error is only a couple mph at that size, providing a slightly lower gear ratio for a quicker feeling car. I highly recommend it...
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 10:37 PM
  #5  
cfamilyfix's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 2
From: Brooklyn NY
215-50-13 is what I have used with good results
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 10:57 PM
  #6  
Crispin38's Avatar
o.O
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 871
Likes: 2
From: 64865
No rubbing on 215/50/13's? What about mileage?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 11:05 PM
  #7  
cfamilyfix's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 2
From: Brooklyn NY
No rubbing in an fb or 82 626, or even my glc with 85 rx7 front struts and brakes. Mileage isnt anything to write home about, but I have been in love with the stance since day one.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 11:09 PM
  #8  
Crispin38's Avatar
o.O
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 871
Likes: 2
From: 64865
I'll prolly make the switch at some point.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 05:44 PM
  #9  
NanaimoRx-7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 724
Likes: 1
From: Fort McMurray, Alberta
I used to run some 205/60/13's on waffles that looked decent, later I went to 185/60/13 (close out sale on sumitomo's like $35/tire) and hated them. There was a small improvement in acceleration but it wasn't really worth it, I think on paper it calculated out to be like changing from the stock 3.909 to 4.1.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2011 | 05:50 PM
  #10  
NCross's Avatar
Thread Starter
I have a rotary addiction
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 24
From: Columbia, Tennessee
So it was noticeable? I have 205-50-15 now which is about 1 inch shorter than stock. I have noticed that this car reads 2-3 MPH higher and like 1.5 % more mileage on the same trips than my FC. My FC reads 25.8 miles to work and the SA reads 26.2

Maybe 50-13s are a bit too small. I'd like to see some 60-13s on a lowered autoX'er.

MPG probably looks bad because your odometer would read incorrectly. You're probably getting the same mileage.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 12:39 PM
  #11  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
Here's a shot with the 215/50/13 Sumi's. Speedo error seems about 2-3 mph, but acceleration is improved a bit.
Attached Thumbnails Anyone with waffles and 50 series tires? Pros and cons.-csp-98-222.jpg   Anyone with waffles and 50 series tires? Pros and cons.-csp-98-side.jpg   Anyone with waffles and 50 series tires? Pros and cons.-csp-98.jpg  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rx7jocke
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
72
Jun 17, 2016 03:48 AM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
scissorhands
Introduce yourself
4
Sep 14, 2015 03:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.