1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

any adverse reason not to fab a 2" carb spacer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-02, 02:45 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
any adverse reason not to fab a 2" carb spacer?

figures, i gots lots of stuff laying around, got tools, might as well and do a 'free' mod and try a spacer
Old 07-16-02, 05:31 PM
  #2  
Gone Race'n

iTrader: (4)
 
moremazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try it and let us know how it works!!!
Old 07-16-02, 07:19 PM
  #3  
all aboard!

 
nimrodTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
All you need is some longer studs then stack a few spacers. I've got an extra or two laying around if you want them.
Old 07-16-02, 07:42 PM
  #4  
Full Member

 
Spieder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would elevating your carb up 2 inches be so high that the hood would smash it?
Old 07-17-02, 08:04 AM
  #5  
Rotary Freak

 
V8kilr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Troy,Mi
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
out of all the diferent stuff i seen come through this forum that is one of the best ideas i heard in a long time,

i have been wondering the same thing myself,
but i was thinking of a 1" spacer

or take out the vacum plate and use a 2" spacer in its place
Old 07-17-02, 09:21 AM
  #6  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Okay, I can tell you several things to watch out for if you try it...

- Carb studs will need to be longer
- OMP rod will need to be lengthened
- The hood WILL PROBABLY NOT clear the air cleaner. There is about 1" of clearance stock, and the stock spacer is 1/2" thick. Plus you need to allow room for engine movement (I have blue marks on the bottom of my hood despite the 1" of clearance!)
- DO NOT make it an open spacer. What I mean is, #1 and #2 rotors need to be separate from each other. If you make it a big open spacer you screw up the vacuum signal and the carb will run extremely lean at the top end. I speak from experience here not theory
Old 07-17-02, 11:16 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
#1 yea figured that, looking for studs
#2 OMP whats that , its long gone
#3 Air cleaner whats that just like omp, long gone...(im ghetto), i might put it back on and run no hood, I am in Tx after all, no one would notice
#4 yea, figured as much IIRC your website had a thing on it about that, or something similar

so just the rotors need to be seperated? or all barrels
Old 07-17-02, 11:51 AM
  #8  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Just the rotors. It is beneficial for the primary and secondary runners to have a passage betwen them.

You really need to run an air cleaner! Rotaries die quickly unless their air is microscopically clean.
Old 07-17-02, 11:56 AM
  #9  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by peejay
You really need to run an air cleaner! Rotaries die quickly unless their air is microscopically clean.
Just like my Baja Bug. It quickly lost compression and started buring oil like mad. While I was redoing the engine, I found that my spiffy chrome air cleaner did not have an element in it, so the carb was sucking down all the dirt/mud/sand that I was subjecting the car to.
Old 07-17-02, 12:28 PM
  #10  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
GTU teams used to not run air cleaners on their race rotaries... what they were discovering was that after a few HOURS the engines would noticeably lose compression! I mean, OUCH!
Old 07-17-02, 12:42 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
10-4 on the air cleaner
Old 07-17-02, 07:55 PM
  #12  
Full Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Stripgear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Brenham, Texas
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
peejay,
Why is it beneficial for the primary and secondary runners to have a passage between them?
Old 07-17-02, 08:24 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
prolly same reason siamese runners are good

(always heard good, but no idea why )
Old 07-18-02, 12:04 AM
  #14  
Seven Is Coming

iTrader: (1)
 
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What exactly would a spacer accomplish? I mean, why do it?

~T.J.
Old 07-18-02, 02:52 AM
  #15  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
It's beneficial because, I've discovered, the primary runner is rather small - it doesn't flow as much as the primary barrels of the carb. You need to have the passage so the primary barrel can flow its maximum, otherwise the secondaries won't open fully.

I had all four holes individual and ran a best of 15.6. No other changes to the car except for milling the primary-secondary channels open netted me 15.1. I think the channels are necessary
Old 07-18-02, 03:10 AM
  #16  
Seven Is Coming

iTrader: (1)
 
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I still dont understand...Anyone care to try and explain? Im willing to learn...Maybe you could try explaining what a "runner" is and what this and that is. I understand what the intake and carb look like, but I dont know the terms for anything...Thanks

~T.J.
Old 07-18-02, 03:37 AM
  #17  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Runner - the port itself
Old 07-18-02, 03:53 AM
  #18  
Seven Is Coming

iTrader: (1)
 
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Ok, why make the space between the carb and intake manifold larger? What bennifit could this possibly have? I mean, I thought you would want it as short and precise as you could get it? Why add 2" in there? And what are the channels? Im assuming you have 4 channels...Two for each rotor, one primary and one secondary. And your saying that you should, in essence, make only two channels? So you have one for both primary and secondary per rotor?

~T.J.
Old 07-18-02, 04:02 AM
  #19  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
I'd like to know myself what benefits it has I'd do it just for the sake of experimentation.
Old 07-18-02, 08:06 AM
  #20  
Nikki-Modder Rex-Rodder

 
Sterling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Trying to convince some clown not to put a Holley 600 on his 12a.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
From my "Stockels Auto Mechanic Fundamentals" book, I understand that lengthening the intake brings the powerband down in the RPM range.

Conversly, legnthening the exhaust RAISES the power bband in the RPM range.

I got no idea why. Well, some - but I'm unqualified to explain it. It only marginally makes any sense to me.
However, Paul Yaws site has a good tech artical on why this works, I think. I know for certain he explains why the exhaust length thing works.
Old 07-18-02, 08:13 AM
  #21  
standard combustion

 
WackyRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heres what I learned from college about basic flow on V8 piston engines. Closed plemonum with spacer(all four barrels seperated): better lowend torque.

Open plemonum shorter spacer(all four barrels all exposed to the same void): better highend power

Please note: this info is for V8 small block engines as a guide. I am sure its slightly different with rotaries. Like PeeJay mentioned with keeping the two rotors flows seperate?
Old 07-18-02, 05:04 PM
  #22  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Sterling


Conversly, legnthening the exhaust RAISES the power bband in the RPM range.
always heard this was due to scavenging,

when people place cutouts on thir cars down here, most try and do it as far back as possible cuz 'it makes mo powa'

again no hard evidence, just what i hear.
Old 07-18-02, 08:12 PM
  #23  
Nikki-Modder Rex-Rodder

 
Sterling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Trying to convince some clown not to put a Holley 600 on his 12a.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
From Paul Yaws site without permission...



Pressure Wave Tuning

"Since most rotary applications utilize a stock, or off the shelf aftermarket manifold, manipulating the pressure waves by changing the length of the induction tract is not as practical as with the exhaust system. For this reason I will not cover this in great detail.

The pressure wave theories that I discussed in the exhaust article apply to the intake system as well, but there are a few differences between the two. 1. The pressure waves will be much weaker, and so their effect will not be as great. 2. Since the intake manifold is typically much shorter than the exhaust system, the pressure waves will be reflected back and forth several times before they arrive at the intake port at the appropriate time in the cycle. Each time they reflect, they will lose some energy which reduces their usefulness. 3. In the case of the induction system, it is the positive, or high pressure waves, rather than the negative, or low pressure waves that are useful for increasing horsepower.

By timing the positive return wave to arrive at the intake port right before it closes, the pressure differential between the port, and the chamber will be increased. This will increase the flow into the chamber at the end of the cycle when it is typically at it lowest.

There are a few basic rules that apply to pressure wave tuning the induction system. A longer manifold will delay the waves for a greater period of time, and so tune the manifold for a lower rpm range, just as with the exhaust system. A longer manifold will also increase the peak torque output of the engine, in addition to the above mentioned effects. This is the result of the manifold containing a greater mass of air. (Remember, energy = mass times velocity squared.) At the end of the intake cycle, when the chamber pressure is increasing, this greater mass (Which is travelling at a high velocity) will better overcome the rising chamber pressure, resulting in greater airflow during that critical period. Additionally, a greater pressure drop will be created at the beginning of the cycle when the chamber begins to expand, because the engine will have to "pull" harder to get this greater mass of air moving. It is this initial low pressure condition which starts the pressure wave cycle, and the result is a pressure wave of greater intensity which if timed correctly, will increase volumetric efficiency"


Gueezus- Brutal tryan ta read that ****, yeah?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
The1Sun
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
09-18-15 07:13 PM
The1Sun
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
09-15-15 04:45 PM



Quick Reply: any adverse reason not to fab a 2" carb spacer?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.