1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

84 rear suspension question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-11, 01:10 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: washington
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
84 rear suspension question

My question pertains to the lower links of the rear suspension. I am building my own three link with panhard bar. I have read that the 84~85 years Mazda lowered the front lower link mount by 20mm. The big question is at stock ride height do the lower links angle down , level or angle up. I do understand that if it is level it gives neutral roll steer, if they angle down (from back to front) it will induce roll under steer.. ??


Thank U
Robert
Old 07-18-11, 05:02 AM
  #2  
The Shadetree Project

iTrader: (40)
 
Hyper4mance2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: District of Columbia
Posts: 7,301
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
IIRC At stock ride height and stock size tires they're pretty close to flat.
Old 07-18-11, 05:34 AM
  #3  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by Hyper4mance2k
IIRC At stock ride height and stock size tires they're pretty close to flat.
I had to raise the back of my car significantly to get them level. Series 3s suck that way.

And if the lower links are not level, you get weird roll-steer effects, which is what Mazda was aiming for, but they get amplified when you go to a 3 link and allow the rear suspension to actually move.
Old 07-18-11, 11:30 AM
  #4  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: washington
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by peejay
I had to raise the back of my car significantly to get them level. Series 3s suck that way.

And if the lower links are not level, you get weird roll-steer effects, which is what Mazda was aiming for, but they get amplified when you go to a 3 link and allow the rear suspension to actually move.

I was wanting to lower 3/4" from stock ride height. From my measurements I will have to lower the mounting point on the axle for the lower link 38~40mm ( 1.5"). This will level out the lower link...
It just seemed like a lot to get it level..
So am I safe to assume (on a S3) the lower link goes up hill causing roll under steer at stock ride height.

Robert
Old 07-18-11, 11:55 AM
  #5  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by rk970
So am I safe to assume (on a S3) the lower link goes up hill causing roll under steer at stock ride height.

Robert
Sounds about right. They changed the link mount a hair over 3/4" lower, expressly to introduce roll understeer.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BNR34RB26DETT
Build Threads
42
02-28-18 11:27 AM
GrossPolluter
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
12
08-15-15 10:32 PM



Quick Reply: 84 rear suspension question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.