1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

1st gen. rx7 wieght???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-16, 02:01 AM
  #26  
Junior Member

 
7th Cavalry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Idaho Falls, ID
Posts: 41
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got an 84 SE, no a/c , spare/jack. About 30 lbs of audio. 2460 lbs. Almost empty on fuel. Weighed on a semi scale, so who knows? I was not in it.
Old 04-08-16, 09:31 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
hcaulfield57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
its negligible, its less than 25lbs, and it is in the back where you want it.

we've learned from racing that it is better to have good weight distribution than it is to have less weight, although it might depend on what you're doing.

our example is a spec E30 BMW, which is an 80's 3 series with a cage and modest suspension, its a fun class because the cars are easy to build and the competition is close.

the minimum weight for the class when we ran one, was 2750lbs with driver. the weight distribution of these things is like 60/40 because the BMW engine is easily 1000lbs.

our car weighed in at 2550lbs, with driver, so for the actual race we put #200lbs of weight in the trunk.

you'd think adding 200# would make the car much slower, but it was actually the same, because the improvement in weight distribution more than offset any penalty in a straight line...
Thanks for the response, that's an interesting anecdote and explains a lot. The SA/FB RX-7 was one of the lightest sports cars on the market when it came out (I think only the Fiat X1/9 was lighter), and it's featherlight for today's standards, but still not the lightest car by any means, especially when you consider low volume niche sports cars in the mix. I think what contributed to the RX-7s handling prowess was the location of the weight, especially considering the low placement of the engine.

As a comparison, the AE86 weighs ~100lbs less but I've read the handling is considerably worse in stock form due to body roll, and again where the weight is placed. But don't quote me I have no idea what I'm talking about I'm just hypothesizing about my new hobby

TL;DR: I think I'll ditch the A/C but keep the spare.
Old 04-08-16, 06:25 PM
  #28  
HeyHeyHey..Its the Goose

iTrader: (3)
 
Qingdao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charleston
Posts: 2,795
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by hcaulfield57
I may be overthinking it, but what is the consensus on removing the spare? Does this make the car front heavy or really have any discernible effect?
I wouldn't but I bought the car without a spare. In fact I bought a second gen spare wheel and tire*, a while back, to put in my current car.


*I have the same 4 lug second gen bolt pattern.
Old 04-08-16, 08:35 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
hcaulfield57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Qingdao
I wouldn't but I bought the car without a spare. In fact I bought a second gen spare wheel and tire*, a while back, to put in my current car.


*I have the same 4 lug second gen bolt pattern.
For the weight distribution, or in case of a flat tire?
Old 04-09-16, 06:44 PM
  #30  
HeyHeyHey..Its the Goose

iTrader: (3)
 
Qingdao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charleston
Posts: 2,795
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
In case of a flat... Like I have a/c in case of a hot day , and to balance out the spare.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boriquaguerrero
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
20
04-22-19 01:15 PM
craaaazzy
Comments and Suggestions Archive
3
08-21-15 02:00 PM
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
08-13-15 11:19 AM



Quick Reply: 1st gen. rx7 wieght???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 AM.