1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

1985 preformance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-03, 05:39 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fairfax virginia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1985 preformance?

hey all, this is my first thread here, so here goes...

i got offered an 85 RX-7 for a really nice trade (non auto stuff) and i was wondering how this thing would preform? Some places i've read stock 85 engine juiced out 180 horses, other places ive read it only pumped out 135 horse power, which is true?
Old 03-17-03, 06:25 AM
  #2  
MY NEW NAME IS ROTARY 7S

 
SoRRoW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cell Block 4 (LOCKDOWN)
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well 85 what?

You need to say what it is,12A,or 13B
Old 03-17-03, 06:29 AM
  #3  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (1)
 
85RX7GS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like an SE - 135HP stock and 180HP modified.
Old 03-17-03, 07:59 AM
  #4  
Full Member

 
xxxHondaGuyxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Burnsville, MN (near Twin Cities)
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah..

You need to find out if it's carbuerated (12a) 101hp

or

Fuel Injected (GSL-SE, 13b) 135hp stock.
Old 03-17-03, 09:47 AM
  #5  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fairfax virginia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow the older ones are much weaker than i anticipated lol
Old 03-17-03, 09:52 AM
  #6  
MY NEW NAME IS ROTARY 7S

 
SoRRoW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cell Block 4 (LOCKDOWN)
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Silverbullet
wow the older ones are much weaker than i anticipated lol
What do you mean the older ones?
Old 03-17-03, 10:06 AM
  #7  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fairfax virginia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
older ones as in the first gen
Old 03-17-03, 11:43 AM
  #8  
Born 2 Brap

iTrader: (1)
 
Maguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
the highest powered na rx7 was only 160. and that was the '91. So, the 25 horses isnt really that big of a gap. and of course the 12a's are less, because of the smaller motor. However, the power can be opened up pretty easily on either car.
Old 03-17-03, 11:53 AM
  #9  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
these cars respond REALLY WELL to modifications. Much better than a piston car. Also, keep in mind that stock the weight is only 2300... that's pretty damn light. My '88 weighs 2850, my '98 cavalier weighs 2710..
Old 03-17-03, 01:47 PM
  #10  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fairfax virginia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow i expected like 200HP stock lol, i guess a 1st gen RX7 isn't much of a racing car
Old 03-17-03, 02:07 PM
  #11  
Full Member

 
RotaryMotorDisorter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nope not much of a racing car in stock form. Double the HP and you should be in great shape. Dont forget that even in stock form they handle like a dream.
Old 03-17-03, 02:50 PM
  #12  
MY NEW NAME IS ROTARY 7S

 
SoRRoW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cell Block 4 (LOCKDOWN)
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Silverbullet
older ones as in the first gen
Well he did say 85 meaning first gen.

It dont take much for therse cars to get up and go,dont let the 12A fool ya
Old 03-17-03, 03:07 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

 
BRealistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Morristown, TN
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While my 12a may not have much PEAK horsepower, remember that once in the power band (over4k rpm)rotary engines have a very consistent power delivery- so even though I have only just over 100hp, my car can accelerate better than a piston engine with 100hp peak and the same weight, or similar to a car with 100hp and lighter (like a Paseo). This is why I wish power was shown as a relative term (like average power available from 2k to redline) instead of just peak hp. peak HP can be very deceiving.
What are the best easy mods for more power? Exhaust, intake??
Old 03-17-03, 03:19 PM
  #14  
Junior Member

 
ChairborneRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of power should I expect from a 13b with a full Racing Beat exhaust system?

Also, is there any need to modify the intake (keeping it N/A)? Does the 7 pull in cooler outside air stock, or should I look at some kind of ducting?

Also Also , does anyone have a power (hp/torque) chart for a stock '85 GSL-SE?
Old 03-17-03, 03:21 PM
  #15  
Apprentice Guru

 
PaulFitzwarryne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cloud Nine and Peak of God
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The gen 1 is a 25 year okd design and the power to weight ratio is typical of that period. Most road tests compared it with the Porsche 924, equivalent performance but cheaper. By 1985 it was outdated in stock form and even the gsl-se lost out in road tests to the Honda CRX.

There are three things going for the gen 1
-its relatively light;
-it has a classic 1970s wedge shape look,
- the rotary engine has real potential for modified power compared with the equivalent piston engine.

The 1985 12A as stock in the USA produced 101 hp. With modifications you can get substantial power, up to about 350hp in a street machine, 700+hp in a race version.

The 1985 13B had a stock 136hp, this can be progressively increased to over 500 hp in a street machine using a Gen 2 engine and modern technology.

The stock car is cheap to buy and run. But if you want speed then $6-8,000 in modifications will get you a fantastic performance better than the latest Ferrari or Porsche.

Last edited by PaulFitzwarryne; 03-17-03 at 03:26 PM.
Old 03-17-03, 07:08 PM
  #16  
Driven a turbo FB lately?

iTrader: (1)
 
MIKE-P-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Branch, Indiana
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
see sig

never dynoed, but estimate to be somewhere close to 300
Old 03-17-03, 08:18 PM
  #17  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fairfax virginia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm damn you people, making me confused lol

I was offered an 85 RX-7 for only $500. It runs pretty decent, what do you guys think? From what i've been reading on this thread alone, do they benafit from upgrades more than piston cars? Such as say a K&N filter would add on more horsepower on an RX-7 than it would on a say 300ZX (which i might be buying for a little over 1k)? Man, this is putting me more and more in a delima .
Old 03-17-03, 08:28 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pensacola FLA
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
buy the rx7
Old 03-17-03, 08:34 PM
  #19  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fairfax virginia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry but i'd like to see a little more than just buy the x or the y car.
Old 03-17-03, 08:38 PM
  #20  
Seven Is Coming

iTrader: (1)
 
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
This is all the motivation I need:
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=104314



~T.J.
Old 03-17-03, 08:45 PM
  #21  
MY NEW NAME IS ROTARY 7S

 
SoRRoW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cell Block 4 (LOCKDOWN)
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive seen that car in person and Think I got footage of it on the track.
Old 03-17-03, 09:04 PM
  #22  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fairfax virginia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BTW, i was offered for $700, not $500 sorry.
Old 03-17-03, 09:10 PM
  #23  
MY NEW NAME IS ROTARY 7S

 
SoRRoW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cell Block 4 (LOCKDOWN)
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I personally wouldnt pay no more than $500. for a 12A first gen.

I have seen to many and passsed up alot of good deals,

I bought mine a 84GS with 86k on it all stock,FL car no rust,$175 in the auction. and 10 mins before that bought my first RX7 a red 79.For $50. and sold it for $200. 2 weeks later
Old 03-17-03, 10:42 PM
  #24  
Apprentice Guru

 
PaulFitzwarryne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cloud Nine and Peak of God
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silverbullet. Sorry you are confused but a little more info earlier wouldhave produced better advice.

I now take it you are looking for a cheap sports car rather than one you can spend afortune modifying.

First the RX and ZX were rivals in the market place so new there was little between them. TheZX was more powerful, the RX made up for it in lightness. So their performance was nearly identical.

Over the years neither has become a classic so second hand prices have remained similar. The main difference is that repair costs on the RX are generally much higher, while it is more difficult to find a mechanic who understands rotaries. However 20 year old cars are getting to the endof their life, if there is a major problem itsbetter to part them because the cost of the repaircan be more than the car is worth.

In reality its a personal matter, do you like the shape, color, engine noise rather than an objective decision. At $500 dollars less I would go for the RX as a better deak if they are in the same condition.

The point about increased performance potential between a rotary and pistom engine relates to the design characteristics. A rotary can take a far higher level of modification without the internals breaking up. For example cutting larger ports for a 50% increase in power is far easier mechanically than installing an upgraded camshaft on a piston engine to give the same increase. However simple 'bolt-on' mods like a K&N filter [+2-3hp] would have a similar impact. The exception would be the header, the RX's is very restrictive and a relacement would give you up to 25% increase in power compared with a 10% in the ZX.

A possible deciding factor is RX owners tend to be more helpful and give sound advice and even on a good day to come over and help.

Whatever you decide, enjoy.
Old 03-18-03, 09:07 AM
  #25  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fairfax virginia
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thank you very much, i'll see if i can get it down to 450-500. You guys been great


Quick Reply: 1985 preformance?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.