(DRIVETRAIN) Transmission gear ratios?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-06, 05:02 PM
  #1  
Call me "Snake"

Thread Starter
 
SerpentKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(DRIVETRAIN) Transmission gear ratios?

I've spotted some threads about 2nd gen transmissions swaps into FBs. What's the advantage? Are the ratios different?
I would like a gearbox with a shorter 1st and 2nd gear, or closer ratios. I'm willing to modify. What are my options?
SerpentKing is offline  
Old 05-29-06, 05:09 PM
  #2  
voo doo witchdoctor

 
rOtAryIsbEttEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texarkana, Arkansas
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think that the main reason for swapping them is some of them are stronger than frist gen trannies
as far as ratios go im not sure. the gsl-se transmission has a taller 5th gear than the others do but im not sure of the 2nd gen trannies
rOtAryIsbEttEr is offline  
Old 05-29-06, 05:48 PM
  #3  
Rotoholic Moderookie

iTrader: (4)
 
vipernicus42's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ottawa, Soviet Canuckistan
Posts: 5,962
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Hmm if you're looking for a shorter 1st and 2nd, and I'd assume 3rd since it's forkin' steep, it would probably be easier to change your diff gear. If you don't mind the loss of some top-end, changing the diff gear can help a lot with short distance sprints, which is what most people want to shorten the lower gears for.

For an added bonus, if you have a GS like me, you can use it as an excuse to get a limited slip differential in there, instead of the open one. Or if you want to go all-out, get a miata torsen rear diff, and put it inside your diff's housing. You'll get your taller rear gear *and* better hookups on take off.

Jon
vipernicus42 is offline  
Old 05-29-06, 06:30 PM
  #4  
Call me "Snake"

Thread Starter
 
SerpentKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there a website that lists transmission specs by year? That would tell me a lot.
Thanks for the help.
SerpentKing is offline  
Old 05-29-06, 08:25 PM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (2)
 
rxtasy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 9,312
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes on 237 Posts
google is ur friend. u'll be surprised what u'll find if u search it. here's what i found:
http://members.aol.com/solomiata/Drivetrain.html

actually was trying to find another site that i can't remember the name of. it has "toolbox" in the url. someone here might know the site i'm talking about. it has tons of info on the different tranny ratios, interchangeability and the like.
rxtasy3 is offline  
Old 05-29-06, 09:49 PM
  #6  
Old Fart Young at Heart

iTrader: (6)
 
trochoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St Joe MO
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Not trying to be an *** here, you're new, so a little heads up.

The 1st section has 1007 pages of threads, the archives have 4 pages and growing, thanks to Jon, and there are 4 stickey threads at the top of the forum. You joined 3 days ago and started 4 threads today asking questions that are frequently asked and can be found in a search. Funny thing about doing a search, I, myself personally, always learn more than I was looking for by doing a search.

That is why you received the comment from me about the 289 vs 327, you need to spend more time doing your homework.

We are all here to help, but much of the learning is the personal resposibility of the members. So far you have been fortunate and not gotten flamed and been told, bluntly, to use the search button. I will politely encourage you to do so, as I am not a hand hold holder here to lead newbs down the rotary path. I generally point them in the right direction.

If you choose to flame me for the heads up, I won't be pointing with the index finger.

Welcome to the forum and enjoy your search efforts.
trochoid is offline  
Old 05-29-06, 10:48 PM
  #7  
Call me "Snake"

Thread Starter
 
SerpentKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by trochoid
That is why you received the comment from me about the 289 vs 327, you need to spend more time doing your homework.

If you choose to flame me for the heads up, I won't be pointing with the index finger.
Come on, dude! That totally wasn't a flame, or even a serious remark. You've been nothing but helpful, and I dig it, man! I enjoy my car hobby, so I keep the banter light. I'm just having fun, I thought it was obvious. We're cool, right?

As for searching the archive, it occured to me that a lot of that stuff was years old. So, I thought I would freshen the info pool & clean out the fridge. Some people refer to it as 'bench racing'. Let's smoke the peace pipe, dude.
SerpentKing is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 01:14 AM
  #8  
Lapping = Fapping

iTrader: (13)
 
Jeff20B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 15,725
Received 70 Likes on 64 Posts
This is from Felix Miata's site (currently offline)

Code:
US Spec Mazda Driveline Ratios


 20:55                                             Rear  Net            Tire RPM @  -Countershaft & Mainshaft Gear Teeth--
   Vehicle     Year  1st   2nd   3rd   4th   5th   Axle Final Tire Size RPM  60 MPH C1  C2  C3  C4  C5  M1  M2  M3  M4  M5 Tooth Count Certainty or Notes
626           79-82 3.214 1.818 1.296 1.000 0.860 3.636 3.128 185/70-13  894  2796  14  22  27  30  31  27  24  21  18  16
B2000         82-84 4.359 2.519 1.507 1.000 0.875 3.308 2.894
B2000  Auto   82-84 4.359 2.519 1.507 1.000 0.875 3.900 3.413
B2200         82-84 4.359 2.519 1.507 1.000 0.875 3.900 3.413
B2x00         85-up 3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.859                                   13  20  32  37  47  28  26  27  22  24
B2x00  Man4WD 87-88     Part # M054-27-110A       ----> 4.444  fits RX-2, RX-3*, RX-7, RWD 626 thru 1985; Miata '94-up
Cosmo         76    3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000 0.862 3.636 3.134 185/70-14  855  2680  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 100%
Cosmo         77-78 3.380 2.002 1.390 1.000 0.791 3.636 2.877 185/70-14  855  2460  14  22  27  31  33  29  27  23  19  16 100%
Cosmo         78.5  3.380 2.077 1.390 1.000 0.791 3.636 2.877 185/70-14  855  2460  14  22  27  31  33  29  28  23  19  16 100%
R-100         70-72
REPU          74    3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000       4.625 4.625 7.35-14    792  3663  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 TRPM Estimated
REPU   Auto   74    3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000       4.375 4.375 7.35-14    792  3465  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 TRPM Estimated
REPU          75    3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000       4.375 4.375 7.35-14    792  3465  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 TRPM Estimated
REPU   Auto   75    3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000       4.111 4.111 7.35-14    792  3256  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 TRPM Estimated
REPU          76    3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000 0.862 4.111 3.544 7.35-14    792  2807  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 TRPM Estimated
REPU          77-78 3.380 2.002 1.390 1.000 0.791 3.900 3.085 7.35-14    792  2443  14  22  27  31  33  29  27  23  19  16 TRPM Estimated
RX-2          71-74 3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000       3.900 3.900 165-13     894  3487  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 TRPM Estimated
RX-3          72-75 3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000       3.700 3.700 155-13     904  3345  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 TRPM Estimated
RX-3          76    3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000 0.862 3.727 3.213 175/70-13  904  2904  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16
RX-3          77-78 3.380 2.002 1.390 1.000 0.791 3.727 2.949 175/70-13  904  2665  14  22  27  31  33  29  27  23  19  16
RX-3          78.5  3.380 2.077 1.390 1.000 0.791 3.727 2.949 175/70-13  904  2665  14  22  27  31  33  29  28  23  19  16
RX-4          73-75 3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000       3.900 3.900 BR70-13    873  3405  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 TRPM Estimated
RX-4          76    3.683 2.263 1.397 1.000 0.862 3.636 3.134 BR70-13    873  2736  14  22  28  32  33  29  28  22  18  16 TRPM Estimated
RX-4          77-78 3.380 2.002 1.390 1.000 0.791 3.636 2.877 BR70-13    873  2511  14  22  27  31  33  29  27  23  19  16 TRPM Estimated


03/12/01


US Spec Mazda Driveline Ratios


 20:55                                             Rear  Net            Tire RPM @  -Countershaft & Mainshaft Gear Teeth--
   Vehicle     Year  1st   2nd   3rd   4th   5th   Axle Final Tire Size RPM  60 MPH C1  C2  C3  C4  C5  M1  M2  M3  M4  M5 Tooth Count Certainty or Notes
RX-4          78.5  3.380 2.077 1.390 1.000 0.791 3.636 2.877 195/70-13  873  2511  14  22  27  31  33  29  28  23  19  16
RX-7          79-83 3.674 2.218 1.433 1.000 0.825 3.909 3.227 185/70-13  892  2878  13  20  25  29  31  28  26  21  17  15
RX-7          83    3.674 2.218 1.433 1.000 0.825 3.909 3.227 195/60-14  891  2875  13  20  25  29  31  28  26  21  17  15
RX-7   auto   84    2.458 1.458 1.000 0.720       3.909 3.909 185/70-13  892  3487
RX-7   GSL-SE 84    3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.758 4.083 3.097 205/60-14  878  2719  13  20  32  37  51  28  26  27  22  23
RX-7          84p   3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.807 3.933 3.175 185/70-13  892  2832  13  20  32  37  50  28  26  27  22  24
RX-7          85    3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.807 3.909 3.156 185/70-13  892  2815  13  20  32  37  50  28  26  27  22  24
RX-7   GSL-SE 85    3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.715 4.077 2.914 205/60-14  851  2480  13  20  32  37  40  28  26  27  22  17
RX-7   mixed  85    3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.697 4.444 3.099 205/55-14  910  2820  13  20  32  37  41  28  26  27  22  17
RX-7   Base   86-91 3.476 2.002 1.366 1.000 0.711 4.100 2.917 185/70-14  855  2494  15  21  32  37  52  31  25  26  22  22
RX-7   GXL    87-91 3.476 2.002 1.366 1.000 0.697 4.100 2.859 205/60-15  841  2404  15  21  32  37  41  31  25  26  22  17
RX-7   Turbo  87-91 3.483 2.015 1.391 1.000 0.719 4.100 2.948 205/55-16  828  2441
RX-7   Conv   88
RX-7   GTUs   89    3.476 2.002 1.366 1.000 0.758 4.300 3.261 205/55-16  828  2700  15  21  32  37  51  31  25  26  22  23
RX-7          93-95 3.483 2.015 1.391 1.000 0.719 4.100 2.948 225/50-16  829  2444
Miata  1.6L   90-93 3.137 1.888 1.331 1.000 0.814 4.300 3.501 185/60-14  910  3186  15  23  34  38  40  26  24  25  21  18
Miata  1.8L   90-97 3.137 1.888 1.331 1.000 0.750 4.100 3.076 185/60-14  910  2799  15  23  34  38  41  26  24  25  21  17
Miata  5-spd  99-   3.136 1.888 1.330 1.000 0.814 4.300 3.500 185/60-14  910  3185
Miata  6-spd  99-   3.760 2.269 1.645 1.257 1.000 3.909 3.295 195/50-15  913  3009 6th .843****
Miata  auto   00-                                 4.100       185/60-14
I would be happy to include non-US models if anyone would submit that info.
Jeff20B is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 01:22 AM
  #9  
Lapping = Fapping

iTrader: (13)
 
Jeff20B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 15,725
Received 70 Likes on 64 Posts
Here's a little number cruching I did to show the torque multiplication in each gear.
Code:
Tranny: 1st gen RX-7, Axle: 3.909
  1st     2nd     3rd     4th     5th
 3.674   2.218   1.433   1.000   0.825
 3.909   3.909   3.909   3.909   3.909
--------------------------------------
14.361   8.670   5.601   3.909   3.224
Jeff20B is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 01:33 AM
  #10  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,505
Received 414 Likes on 295 Posts
Originally Posted by SerpentKing
I've spotted some threads about 2nd gen transmissions swaps into FBs. What's the advantage? Are the ratios different?
The ratios are different, but this is generally a disadvantage. People seem to think that they need a taller 5th gear or something, a taller 5th just means you have to use 4th much more often on the highway.

I would like a gearbox with a shorter 1st and 2nd gear, or closer ratios. I'm willing to modify. What are my options?
FC, technically, have closer ratios 1-4, with a huuge 4-5 drop, but the 1-2 drop for the FC is pretty bad. The 1st-gen transmission has its ratios pretty damn good for a street transmission, except for the 2-3.

Usually when people swap in FC transmissions, they are putting in Turbo II units, which are much stronger. Only required for high powered turbo or nitrous engines. There's no specific advantage to putting a N/A FC transmission in, they are identical internally so there's no strength advantage, the ratios aren't particularly better (but not horribly worse, either) so the main reason for using one is for practical reasons, like not being able to find a 1st-gen unit easily.
peejay is offline  
Old 05-30-06, 01:08 PM
  #11  
Rotoholic Moderookie

iTrader: (4)
 
vipernicus42's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ottawa, Soviet Canuckistan
Posts: 5,962
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Dude, that miata drivetrain interchange site is awesome. It has speedo gear change info!

that could help if you change your rear ratio and tires as I would like to do. I'll just have to crunch the numbers and figure out what kind of speedo gear I need for a 4.1 rear and 205/60/13 tires

How do I figure that out?

Jon
vipernicus42 is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
20B Forum
21
03-22-22 01:00 PM
firzen
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
09-15-15 12:04 PM



Quick Reply: (DRIVETRAIN) Transmission gear ratios?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 AM.