2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

For everyone wondering about gas mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 01:42 PM
  #1  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Rx7 *****
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
For everyone wondering about gas mileage

look here.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2001cartablef.jsp?id=5277
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 02:10 PM
  #2  
UniqueTII's Avatar
Slow and old
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: It's a midwest thing.
Broken link.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 02:38 PM
  #3  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Rx7 *****
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
sorry about that...

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2001c...ef.jsp?id=5277
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 02:42 PM
  #4  
UniqueTII's Avatar
Slow and old
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: It's a midwest thing.
Annual fuel cost $1105. That sounds about right, since I put my car away for the winter.

The emissions on an '87 TII are slightly better than an '89...oh yeah, I don't have cats.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 06:21 PM
  #5  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Hmm, I wonder why the series 4 were 17/24 rather than 16/24 of the series 5?

and emissions are better as well for both N/A and turbo series 4 cars.

Maybe that "extra" HP and efficency of the series 5 cars, is just a little more fuel in the combustion.

Last edited by Icemark; Jul 26, 2002 at 06:27 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 06:23 PM
  #6  
Rpeck's Avatar
What R U thinking self?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, CA
a little bit lighter car. Less gas to get it to "go" in "stop N go" traffic

Last edited by Rpeck; Jul 26, 2002 at 06:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 06:23 PM
  #7  
Manolis_D's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
From: Altadena, CA
would higher compression ratio in the S5's do that at all?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2002 | 09:42 PM
  #8  
kristopher_d's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, WA
I wonder if an RX7 without cylinders would do any better
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2002 | 12:33 AM
  #9  
CanadianRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Duncan, BC, Canada
haha i was thinking the same thing...too bad it wasnt a wankel engine getting that good MPG....thats pretty shitty MPG for a 2 cylinder car though..
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2002 | 03:18 AM
  #10  
TRURX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
My MPG has been even crappier than that. I am not complaining though. I guess those numbers are for ppl who try to keep their rpms below 3000 (imo very difficult to do).
My car is LUCKY to get 12MPG in city. My average MPG is 9-10. Ive replaced O2 and Fuel filter, no ecu codes either, car runs Great!!! Just thirsty, hmm maybe all those flames are taking up my mpg.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2002 | 10:30 AM
  #11  
dre_2ooo's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
75 miles out of 4 gallons is my last recorded fuel-economy.

.. BTW that = 18.75 combined city and highway.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 07:59 AM
  #12  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Rx7 *****
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
i changed my 02 sensor last week and finally filled up today figuring out the gas mileage.

i went from 13 mpg to 16 mpg, just by changing hte 02 sensor.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 08:16 AM
  #13  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Geez, Sounds like BBC gas mileage

Originally posted by TRURX7
My MPG has been even crappier than that. I am not complaining though. I guess those numbers are for ppl who try to keep their rpms below 3000 (imo very difficult to do).
My car is LUCKY to get 12MPG in city. My average MPG is 9-10. Ive replaced O2 and Fuel filter, no ecu codes either, car runs Great!!! Just thirsty, hmm maybe all those flames are taking up my mpg.


You should check more into this. Your gas mileage is flat out ridiculous. I get 15MPG in my Trans AM, and guys that put a 383/396 Stroker in there get 10MPG. I bet my cousin's 72' Buick Electra 225 (7.4L, 455 C.I.D.) gets better gas mileage.

Hell, a 2002 Lamborghini Murcielago gets 8-10MPG.

So replace your spark plugs more often or something, there's got to more to it than that. Don't be satisfied with that type of mileage cause the car's running good, you could get a mod or two once you solve this problem. Cause you would have saved like $200 worth of gas per year.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 08:45 AM
  #14  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Rx7 *****
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
my spark plugs and plug wires are brand spanking new... 16mpg is about right for turbo FCs... i wish i could get more mpg but i'm pretty much at what its suppose to untless i teach my foot that gas money is more important then fun....

i also heard that if you put some CDI boxes in, it helps with mpg... not sure thiough.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Sep 8, 2015 05:36 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 5, 2015 08:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.