2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

For everyone wondering about gas mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-02, 01:42 PM
  #1  
Former Rx7 *****

Thread Starter
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For everyone wondering about gas mileage

look here.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2001cartablef.jsp?id=5277
Old 07-26-02, 02:10 PM
  #2  
Slow and old

 
UniqueTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: It's a midwest thing.
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Broken link.
Old 07-26-02, 02:38 PM
  #3  
Former Rx7 *****

Thread Starter
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry about that...

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2001c...ef.jsp?id=5277
Old 07-26-02, 02:42 PM
  #4  
Slow and old

 
UniqueTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: It's a midwest thing.
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Annual fuel cost $1105. That sounds about right, since I put my car away for the winter.

The emissions on an '87 TII are slightly better than an '89...oh yeah, I don't have cats.
Old 07-26-02, 06:21 PM
  #5  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Hmm, I wonder why the series 4 were 17/24 rather than 16/24 of the series 5?

and emissions are better as well for both N/A and turbo series 4 cars.

Maybe that "extra" HP and efficency of the series 5 cars, is just a little more fuel in the combustion.

Last edited by Icemark; 07-26-02 at 06:27 PM.
Old 07-26-02, 06:23 PM
  #6  
What R U thinking self?

 
Rpeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a little bit lighter car. Less gas to get it to "go" in "stop N go" traffic

Last edited by Rpeck; 07-26-02 at 06:26 PM.
Old 07-26-02, 06:23 PM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
Manolis_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
would higher compression ratio in the S5's do that at all?
Old 07-26-02, 09:42 PM
  #8  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
kristopher_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if an RX7 without cylinders would do any better
Old 07-27-02, 12:33 AM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
CanadianRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
haha i was thinking the same thing...too bad it wasnt a wankel engine getting that good MPG....thats pretty shitty MPG for a 2 cylinder car though..
Old 07-27-02, 03:18 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
TRURX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My MPG has been even crappier than that. I am not complaining though. I guess those numbers are for ppl who try to keep their rpms below 3000 (imo very difficult to do).
My car is LUCKY to get 12MPG in city. My average MPG is 9-10. Ive replaced O2 and Fuel filter, no ecu codes either, car runs Great!!! Just thirsty, hmm maybe all those flames are taking up my mpg.
Old 07-27-02, 10:30 AM
  #11  
...

 
dre_2ooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
75 miles out of 4 gallons is my last recorded fuel-economy.

.. BTW that = 18.75 combined city and highway.
Old 07-29-02, 07:59 AM
  #12  
Former Rx7 *****

Thread Starter
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i changed my 02 sensor last week and finally filled up today figuring out the gas mileage.

i went from 13 mpg to 16 mpg, just by changing hte 02 sensor.
Old 07-29-02, 08:16 AM
  #13  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Geez, Sounds like BBC gas mileage

Originally posted by TRURX7
My MPG has been even crappier than that. I am not complaining though. I guess those numbers are for ppl who try to keep their rpms below 3000 (imo very difficult to do).
My car is LUCKY to get 12MPG in city. My average MPG is 9-10. Ive replaced O2 and Fuel filter, no ecu codes either, car runs Great!!! Just thirsty, hmm maybe all those flames are taking up my mpg.


You should check more into this. Your gas mileage is flat out ridiculous. I get 15MPG in my Trans AM, and guys that put a 383/396 Stroker in there get 10MPG. I bet my cousin's 72' Buick Electra 225 (7.4L, 455 C.I.D.) gets better gas mileage.

Hell, a 2002 Lamborghini Murcielago gets 8-10MPG.

So replace your spark plugs more often or something, there's got to more to it than that. Don't be satisfied with that type of mileage cause the car's running good, you could get a mod or two once you solve this problem. Cause you would have saved like $200 worth of gas per year.
Old 07-29-02, 08:45 AM
  #14  
Former Rx7 *****

Thread Starter
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my spark plugs and plug wires are brand spanking new... 16mpg is about right for turbo FCs... i wish i could get more mpg but i'm pretty much at what its suppose to untless i teach my foot that gas money is more important then fun....

i also heard that if you put some CDI boxes in, it helps with mpg... not sure thiough.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-08-15 05:36 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
09-05-15 08:57 PM



Quick Reply: For everyone wondering about gas mileage



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 AM.