A few questions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 05:13 PM
  #1  
scheherazade's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: DC area
A few questions.

If replacing an already LS1 swapped FD with an LS3, is it plug and play?
Does an LS3 require a different ECU than an LS1 (not referring to tuning, but the ECU itself)? (I assume it just needs a tune?)

For new swaps, do folks prefer to use standalone, or a stock Chevy ECU (because OBD2)? Is either considered an all right way to go?

I found references to the serpentine belt pattern, corvette (wide+short) vs Camaro (narrow+tall), and some people saying you should use the Camaro pattern.
Is the Camaro pattern required, or just easier?

Various swaps use different swap kits. I see many require just a tiny push into the firewall to fit the motor. Then I saw one swap where the motor is recessed really far back, only half of it visible inside the engine bay. Is there a reason to heavily recess the engine? (Trans shifter fitment? weight balance?)

Thanks,
-scheherazade
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2017 | 09:18 AM
  #2  
ZDan's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 682
Likes: 4
From: Pawtucket, RI
Most use GM ECU, I have an LS3 with LS2 GTO ECU.

If you haven't been to norotors.com, get thee there and search around a bit, there's a lot more V8-swapped RX-7 info there.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2017 | 09:41 AM
  #3  
Esser's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 169
Likes: 42
From: Evansville, IN
Originally Posted by scheherazade
If replacing an already LS1 swapped FD with an LS3, is it plug and play?
Does an LS3 require a different ECU than an LS1 (not referring to tuning, but the ECU itself)? (I assume it just needs a tune?)

For new swaps, do folks prefer to use standalone, or a stock Chevy ECU (because OBD2)? Is either considered an all right way to go?

I found references to the serpentine belt pattern, corvette (wide+short) vs Camaro (narrow+tall), and some people saying you should use the Camaro pattern.
Is the Camaro pattern required, or just easier?

Various swaps use different swap kits. I see many require just a tiny push into the firewall to fit the motor. Then I saw one swap where the motor is recessed really far back, only half of it visible inside the engine bay. Is there a reason to heavily recess the engine? (Trans shifter fitment? weight balance?)

Thanks,
-scheherazade

LS3 has almost all different sensors and all plugs are different. ECU is different. You'd be better off buying a harness kit from PSI to run an LS3.

Stock GM ECU is easiest and cheapest option.

All serpentine setups will fit basically, but Fbody is most popular because it is the cheapest.

All the engine mounts sit about the same. There is only room for it in one spot plus or minus a half inch. You dont have much options for engine placement like you're thinking.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2017 | 06:13 PM
  #4  
Lsxrex's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 17
Likes: 1
From: TX
Easier and better to use the GM ecu. Guys can make 2000 HP daily drivable cars on the factory ecu and tune with HPT or EFILive. As for the swap wiring and sensor placement are very different between the two. Just depends if you want the DBW or cable throttle body. I prefer wire over cable for the tunability, cruise control and traction options. Also packaging is easier.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2017 | 09:52 AM
  #5  
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
Fistful of steel
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 27
From: OC, So Cal
Your biggest problem is that the LS1 uses a 24x reluctor wheel on the crank, and the LS3 used a 58x wheel. Also LS3 is drive by wire. This means a convertor or different ECU is needed. Additionally, some of the sensors are in different places, but that is easy to fix.

Last edited by LargeOrangeFont; Dec 21, 2017 at 10:03 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Malikai229
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Nov 11, 2009 12:39 PM
j0rd4n
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Apr 16, 2007 11:17 AM
boohame
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
Sep 20, 2006 11:46 PM
88durel
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Apr 15, 2006 09:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.