FB or FC for build?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-13, 05:34 PM
  #1  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
Gold_1st_Gen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Avilla, IN
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FB or FC for build?

I found an FB roller for $300. Wouldnt it just turn into a pain in the ____ tho? I would probably want to do a steering rack swap and then it would need a different rear end to handle the power. Fb's dont have the aftermarket support that FCs do and the car wont handle as well when its done (even though its lighter.) Should I wait and try to get an FC roller for $800 or so?
Old 06-14-13, 05:47 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
Customisbetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any car at that price will be a pain in the ***.
Old 06-14-13, 05:47 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
FC_Li3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Desert
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FBs are light, I personally am more of a fan of the FC body style.
Old 06-14-13, 06:10 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
ATC529R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mom’s basement
Posts: 798
Received 2,383 Likes on 1,360 Posts
why do you say an FC would handle better?

I'm about to do an FB build mainly because the 78-80 look more classic and are lighter....but I intend to make it handle.

So, I'm interested in responses.
Old 06-14-13, 07:16 PM
  #5  
5 and counting.

iTrader: (7)
 
FC3S Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
FC would be a little easier due to more of an LSx adapter "aftermarket". FB shouldnt be bad BUT it all depends on how deep your pockets are for either chassis.

I would assume FC would be cheaper.
Old 06-14-13, 10:38 PM
  #6  
My job is to blow **** up

iTrader: (8)
 
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: palmyra Indiana
Posts: 2,900
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
stock for stock fc over the fb chassis.
Old 06-14-13, 10:48 PM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
ATC529R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mom’s basement
Posts: 798
Received 2,383 Likes on 1,360 Posts
what about an FB with second gen brakes/calipers (84-85 spindles) and slotted rotors, simple coil overs, aftermarket shocks, sway bars and 17 x 9.5 x 255 rubbers in the rear and 16 x 8.5 x 225's In .the front, sway bars, full bushing and steering refreshments.

Serious question. cause that's my plan on the setup i'm planning.

considering the weight advantage......would the FB win out or lose to an FC with similar upgrades?

Cause the FC is still 22-28 years old and would need those things for a build as well.
Old 06-15-13, 02:24 PM
  #8  
My job is to blow **** up

iTrader: (8)
 
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: palmyra Indiana
Posts: 2,900
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
the weakest part of the fb is the old recirc ball steering box, change that to a rack and pinion of your flavor, or just swap in FC subframes( been done before) or even better yet rx8 subframes
Old 10-14-13, 09:31 PM
  #9  
Junior Member

 
CobraPowered87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New Paltz, NY
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For me, the whole point of putting my 5.0 in an FC was to get rid of the live axle. I loved all my Mustangs, but they handle for crap in turns (until the early 2000's Cobra, I know, I know!). Now I have my Mustang growl (nothing like it!) and launching power with the ability to pour through turns like an RX-7... as long as I don't hit the gas in a turn lol! Like a sexy Japanese woman who speaks perfect English. Mmm...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Einheri
Single Turbo RX-7's
14
10-07-15 12:23 PM



Quick Reply: FB or FC for build?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 AM.