310rwhp@13lbs stock engine,stock intercooler.
07-11-12, 09:48 AM
#1
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
310rwhp@13lbs stock engine,stock intercooler.
I just installed and tuned a Haltech PS1k on this S5 Rx7.. engine is a stock JDM using the stock intercooler. car has resized secondary injectors 2x1200cc's and stock 550cc primaries.. car is using a t04e turbo. Garrett.. bosch intank fuel pump.. enjoy the vid..
S5 Rx7 with a haltech S1k - YouTube
S5 Rx7 with a haltech S1k - YouTube
The following users liked this post:
Gzüf (05-28-23)
07-11-12, 02:50 PM
#6
those are really good numbers , how much more power do you think he's making from having the standalone over having a stock ecu/rtek/safc etc ?
Im trying get around 200 whp or so initially with potential for 250-280whp on my s4 when i build it up, running either a stock s4 or s5 turbo, stock port motor.
Doubt I'll be getting a standalone, cant really afford that but who knows, im just curious as to how much power you can squeeze out of fine tuning on a standalone over using other options.
Im trying get around 200 whp or so initially with potential for 250-280whp on my s4 when i build it up, running either a stock s4 or s5 turbo, stock port motor.
Doubt I'll be getting a standalone, cant really afford that but who knows, im just curious as to how much power you can squeeze out of fine tuning on a standalone over using other options.
Trending Topics
07-15-12, 10:37 AM
#14
Edit: just noticed this was on a mustang dyno...wow.
310-315 whp is just about the max you can achieve with any shred of efficiency on the stock tmic. The 2" piping , core size and end tank design become a severe restriction past that amount of airflow. Also keep in mind that the jdm s5 tmic is bigger than the usdm tmic,so unless you have one, don't expect this level of performance.
AI is a nice bandaid for high IAT's , but it does nothing for pressure drop, or the physical restriction to airflow. If you plan on shooting for 350+ you are better off modifying the tmic inlet/outlet to at least 2.25" or ditching it altogether and running straight AI in quantities sufficient to provide all your charge cooling needs.
310-315 whp is just about the max you can achieve with any shred of efficiency on the stock tmic. The 2" piping , core size and end tank design become a severe restriction past that amount of airflow. Also keep in mind that the jdm s5 tmic is bigger than the usdm tmic,so unless you have one, don't expect this level of performance.
AI is a nice bandaid for high IAT's , but it does nothing for pressure drop, or the physical restriction to airflow. If you plan on shooting for 350+ you are better off modifying the tmic inlet/outlet to at least 2.25" or ditching it altogether and running straight AI in quantities sufficient to provide all your charge cooling needs.
07-16-12, 06:28 PM
#18
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
jdm's have no nipple for the small hoses on the rear left side of the intercooler.. us series 4 do.. us series 5 dont
07-17-12, 11:54 AM
#21
Edit: just noticed this was on a mustang dyno...wow.
310-315 whp is just about the max you can achieve with any shred of efficiency on the stock tmic. The 2" piping , core size and end tank design become a severe restriction past that amount of airflow. Also keep in mind that the jdm s5 tmic is bigger than the usdm tmic,so unless you have one, don't expect this level of performance.
AI is a nice bandaid for high IAT's , but it does nothing for pressure drop, or the physical restriction to airflow. If you plan on shooting for 350+ you are better off modifying the tmic inlet/outlet to at least 2.25" or ditching it altogether and running straight AI in quantities sufficient to provide all your charge cooling needs.
310-315 whp is just about the max you can achieve with any shred of efficiency on the stock tmic. The 2" piping , core size and end tank design become a severe restriction past that amount of airflow. Also keep in mind that the jdm s5 tmic is bigger than the usdm tmic,so unless you have one, don't expect this level of performance.
AI is a nice bandaid for high IAT's , but it does nothing for pressure drop, or the physical restriction to airflow. If you plan on shooting for 350+ you are better off modifying the tmic inlet/outlet to at least 2.25" or ditching it altogether and running straight AI in quantities sufficient to provide all your charge cooling needs.
I'll report back with the results of the larger endtanks since I havent found much about modifying a stock TMIC. I also believe I have the "JDM" version. it does say rotary with intercooler and is all silver, no black.
07-17-12, 05:49 PM
#22
Please report back, my calculations only account for the airflow through the piping they do not account for the restriction posed by the core itself (which was obviously not designed to support such power levels) but hopefully it will work out for you.
12-21-12, 05:25 AM
#25
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
those are really good numbers , how much more power do you think he's making from having the standalone over having a stock ecu/rtek/safc etc ?
Im trying get around 200 whp or so initially with potential for 250-280whp on my s4 when i build it up, running either a stock s4 or s5 turbo, stock port motor.
Doubt I'll be getting a standalone, cant really afford that but who knows, im just curious as to how much power you can squeeze out of fine tuning on a standalone over using other options.
Im trying get around 200 whp or so initially with potential for 250-280whp on my s4 when i build it up, running either a stock s4 or s5 turbo, stock port motor.
Doubt I'll be getting a standalone, cant really afford that but who knows, im just curious as to how much power you can squeeze out of fine tuning on a standalone over using other options.