Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs
Sponsored by:

184 RWHP S4 6-port

Old 10-30-12, 07:34 PM
  #26  
premix, for f's sake

Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: madison, WI
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
^correct. even in modern engines, after a certain given amount of TPS input, the ECU will pretty much ignore all O2 sensor input, and go into a pre-determined mapping. in older setups, O2 only comes into play in steady state cruise scenarios


and keep in mind, 184whp could be calculated as being 211 at the flywheel, with a very modest 15% powertrain loss
Old 10-31-12, 10:22 AM
  #27  
Full Member
 
livevil904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgt.Stinkfist
^correct. even in modern engines, after a certain given amount of TPS input, the ECU will pretty much ignore all O2 sensor input, and go into a pre-determined mapping. in older setups, O2 only comes into play in steady state cruise scenarios


and keep in mind, 184whp could be calculated as being 211 at the flywheel, with a very modest 15% powertrain loss

Now I understand. Thanks for the replies. I already understood that that was RWHP and not at the flywheel, so I would be looking for 170 RWHP equivalently as my goal.

I was looking up what it would cost to get my car tuned and it would be
200 for a used apexi neo SAFC
100 to install it
125 for a fuel pressure regulator
150 an hour for dyno and tuning (estimated at 2 hours)

Does this seem reasonable? I could probably install the controller myself.


What sort of power gains could I expect?
Old 11-01-12, 10:49 PM
  #28  
Full Member
 
livevil904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, btw, 184 RWHP would be 216 flywheel horsepower, not 211.

184 = (.85)(HP)
184/(.85) = HP
216.5 ~ HP

Sorry, I'm a math major and so I couldn't help correcting that.
Old 04-05-13, 07:50 AM
  #29  
Junior Member

 
julesfc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Québec
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QC

great numbers. I'm building almost the same setup with an s5 intake and I port my exhauts with pinnaple template. I'm realy curious how much I will pull. I'll keep you updated
Old 11-12-14, 09:58 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
ibeljin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ontario
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its impressive to see what people can do with the NA motors. Put a turbo on damn near anything and it will make power, building a good NA more challenging
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 03:25 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
10-08-15 10:09 PM
PinkRacer
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
43
10-01-15 09:13 AM
CWA
Introduce yourself
0
09-23-15 12:59 PM
RX200013B
Haltech Forum
6
09-23-15 08:47 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 184 RWHP S4 6-port



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.