Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

184 RWHP S4 6-port

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 01:13 AM
  #1  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
Thread Starter
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
184 RWHP S4 6-port

82 GS, S4 6port 13B, street port, 184.9hp/152tq in a 1st gen, but still an S4 motor



DSC_0942.mp4 video by 1stgenrx - Photobucket
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 01:12 PM
  #2  
tuscanidream's Avatar
T2 Duo!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 3
From: RI/CT
Not bad. What made you swap to s4 6port?

Love the color of the car, like the wheels.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 05:39 PM
  #3  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
Thread Starter
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
thanks, as per why an S4 motor, I had an 86 GXL that i picked up years ago for $300, but the body was questionable and it would take too much money to make the car as a whole useable again, so i gutted the whole engne, efi harness and assorted electronics out and used them to replace my old carb'd 12A... plus i wanted more power, better fuel economy and better driveability
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 06:48 PM
  #4  
mario1386's Avatar
mazda mario
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: port st lucie
what ecu ? standalone? fuel set up ?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2012 | 10:06 PM
  #5  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
Thread Starter
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
stock N326 ecu with a SAFC-II controlling fuel , inline Walbro 255, and all "new" '88 high impedance 460cc injectors
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 12:13 AM
  #6  
dwb87's Avatar
This is my social media.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
From: WA
Impressive. Torque numbers?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 02:16 PM
  #7  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Originally Posted by dwb87
impressive. Torque numbers?
152 ?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 09:18 PM
  #8  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
Thread Starter
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
yes, 152tq. and im still unsure as to why, but my factory ecu doesnt seem to want to push the injectors past ~65% duty cycle (which seems pretty low to me) regardless of how much i add with the SAFC. A/F's will hold pretty much 13.5:1 until around 6500, then it will progressively lean out to around 14.5:1 by 8k... i wonder if the "20k mile" switch for the ECU has anything to do with it
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 07:20 AM
  #9  
wthdidusay82's Avatar
Rotary Power
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 4
From: Dinwiddie, Va
I'm sure you know this, but you're probably very close to the max of what the stock 460cc injectors can handle for power

Regardless, 185 whp is alot for an na. That means you're pushing around 210+ to the flywheel, and being in the light 1st gen chassis I'm sure you could run a high 13 sec pass/low 14 if you went to the strip.


I'd say your car has more power than my old rx7, mine probably had 170 hp or more to the flywheel is my guess.

I had an s4 n/a with a streetport by rotary resurrection, i had my 5/6 ports completely removed, tb mod + porting, i had racingbeat streetable header, straight pipe (no cat), and borla catback exhaust. Had my emissions, ac, powersteering and airpump removed.

I never dynoed mine but i was able to keep up to a 90 nissan 300zx automatic and a 05 bmw 330i, runs on the highway , dead even ---but pulling everytime i switched gears (i had a lightweight flywheel and upgraded clutch).
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2012 | 08:57 PM
  #10  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,857
Likes: 3,243
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Sgt.Stinkfist
yes, 152tq. and im still unsure as to why, but my factory ecu doesnt seem to want to push the injectors past ~65% duty cycle (which seems pretty low to me) regardless of how much i add with the SAFC. A/F's will hold pretty much 13.5:1 until around 6500, then it will progressively lean out to around 14.5:1 by 8k... i wonder if the "20k mile" switch for the ECU has anything to do with it
nice numbers! but yeah the S4 ecu really doesn't drive the injectors very hard. Rtek, or maybe bump the fuel pressure a little. there might be a couple HP in running it a teeny bit richer actually
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2012 | 11:56 PM
  #11  
Flash's Avatar
re-amemiya body vert
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Canada
Have to give you credit for this. Considering the stock S4 made 146 hp at the crank and you made 184 to the wheels, that is sweet. Must be a lot of fun to drive!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 12:00 AM
  #12  
beachFC's Avatar
Bridge Burner.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 2
From: Long Beach
Full list of mods please
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2012 | 10:16 PM
  #13  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
Thread Starter
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
mild/moderate street port using Pineapple Racing templates and enlarged upon, S5 TII rotor housings, Goopy performance oversized apex seals, Goopy performance 6 port inserts (removes barrels and replaces with "ramps" permanently fixed the end of the port), fully removed 6 port actuator rods and assemblies, sealed off remaining holes and smoothed over. Ported, smoothed and port matched throttle body, upper plenum, intermediate manifold and lower manifold, random no name cone air filter. Exhaust is a RB header with inlets ported and smoothed to better work with later model 13b ports, the collector was cut off and I ran dual 2" pipes to a RB dual inlet muffler. All emissions removed and blocked off, throttle body has been stripped down to the bare essentials, as well as the engine harness. Walbro 255 fuel pump, 4 reman'd stock 460cc injectors, SAFC-II for control, and a MSD 6AL running my leading coil

...and not really having anything to do with power per say but... the header primaries and wrapped heavily to keep manifold temps down, large 3 row aluminum radiator w/ Taurus efan, and im using the old old pre-84 215mm RB steel flywheel w/ the S4 counterweight (motor was originally an auto) and a clutchmasters stage 3 kevlar clutch.

thats about all i can think of for now. although i am picking up a pair of lancer evo 560cc injectors soon to replace my secondaries and see if i can gain some more top end, ill just have to retune my SAFC past 3500 rpm, but no biggie
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 01:19 PM
  #14  
mdfitness704's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: charlotte nc
i like!
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 03:37 AM
  #15  
beachFC's Avatar
Bridge Burner.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 2
From: Long Beach
****** A how the **** did you make so much power on such a modest build?!
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 12:10 PM
  #16  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,857
Likes: 3,243
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by beachFC
****** A how the **** did you make so much power on such a modest build?!
lots of little things. tight engine, an exhaust that probably comes close to having matching openings (the block to header is a big mismatch), etc etc
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 08:22 AM
  #17  
rotaryB-2000's Avatar
Psalms 37**25
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From: Garnerville N.Y
awsome!!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 10:20 PM
  #18  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
Thread Starter
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
I think it is just a package that meshed well together, even tho intended, more likely by coincidence and luck. Probably just all the little things coming together making a larger picture. I can say that I did spend a lot of time on the intake manifolds, which from what ive heard many times, is the first bottle neck in making power on a S4 NA motor. I found that there is a lot of port mismatch from the TB all the way to the LIM. I even found 1/8" to 1/4" of lip in some areas, esp. around the upper plenum to intermediate runner section. by the time I considered the manifold "done" I couldnt feel the transitions by hand in any of the mating surfaces, and i smoothed over/polished all the casting marks and surfaces I could find upstream of the injectors paths/runners, including the entire upper plenum chamber.


...in a nut shell, I went to the dyno hoping for 160 at the wheels, when I was told 181WHP after the first run I started with my questions about HP correction, the atmospheric factors and so on. and yes, the dyno had its own weather station being used for inputs for correction showing the actual in the garage temps, atmosperic pressure, humidity and so on so Im pretty confident nothing was fudged to inflate my ego/or build up the tuners name .esp as it was a "trade of services" deal and no money or reputation was being exchange. I advanced the CAS a few degrees and after the 3rd run i was just shy of 185WHP and decided it was safe to call it a day, and not push my luck advancing timing any further.

The next leg of my journey now involves picking up 4 Lancer EVO9 560cc injectors this week and im gonna start by popping a pair of them in my secondary fuel rail and retune my SAFC to see if i can take care of the 6500-8000RPM fuel issue..then maybe.... just maybe consider goin the next step of a semi-stock S4 NA-T setup
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2012 | 08:48 AM
  #19  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
actually you eliminated the one largest by installing the turbo housings and eliminating the n/a exhaust port sleeves. that is the first bottleneck, 2nd in getting past 200 is the intake.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 07:48 PM
  #20  
mario1386's Avatar
mazda mario
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: port st lucie
what plugs were or are you running ?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 07:57 PM
  #21  
Spirit-RE's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 39
From: Whitewater, WI
Impressive
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 01:45 AM
  #22  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
Thread Starter
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
thx. for plugs, im honestly just running fresh O.E. style NGK's in the stock heat ranges
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2012 | 03:48 PM
  #23  
livevil904's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
I've got an 88 vert with a mild to moderate streetport, atkins 6 port sleeves, turbo exhaust sleeves, a k/n cone air intake, a rb header and presilencer, and a stock cat back (which i plan to upgrade soon). Everything else is stock.

After I get a rb catback (or maybe something else), where is my biggest bottle neck if I want to break 200hp at the flywheel? I haven't done any dyno's, but I would guess I'm at least 20 horse short of that currently.

I understand that rtec is some sort of ecu upgrade but I'm not really sure what it does or where to even get it.

Any advice?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2012 | 03:55 PM
  #24  
livevil904's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
It seems like if you have an O2 sensor, the stock ECU would automatically adjust for any upgrades you made that increased engine flow. I don't really know what tuning would be even necessary on an NA fuel injected engine, but I'm still learning.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2012 | 07:27 PM
  #25  
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
My job is to blow **** up
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,903
Likes: 5
From: palmyra Indiana
Originally Posted by livevil904
It seems like if you have an O2 sensor, the stock ECU would automatically adjust for any upgrades you made that increased engine flow. I don't really know what tuning would be even necessary on an NA fuel injected engine, but I'm still learning.
no. the O2 sensor is only used during cruise, and doesn't effect WOT fueling. but you're on the right track, you just meant to say AIR FLOW METER, right?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.