Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

184 RWHP S4 6-port

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2012 | 07:34 PM
  #26  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
Thread Starter
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
^correct. even in modern engines, after a certain given amount of TPS input, the ECU will pretty much ignore all O2 sensor input, and go into a pre-determined mapping. in older setups, O2 only comes into play in steady state cruise scenarios


and keep in mind, 184whp could be calculated as being 211 at the flywheel, with a very modest 15% powertrain loss
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 10:22 AM
  #27  
livevil904's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Originally Posted by Sgt.Stinkfist
^correct. even in modern engines, after a certain given amount of TPS input, the ECU will pretty much ignore all O2 sensor input, and go into a pre-determined mapping. in older setups, O2 only comes into play in steady state cruise scenarios


and keep in mind, 184whp could be calculated as being 211 at the flywheel, with a very modest 15% powertrain loss

Now I understand. Thanks for the replies. I already understood that that was RWHP and not at the flywheel, so I would be looking for 170 RWHP equivalently as my goal.

I was looking up what it would cost to get my car tuned and it would be
200 for a used apexi neo SAFC
100 to install it
125 for a fuel pressure regulator
150 an hour for dyno and tuning (estimated at 2 hours)

Does this seem reasonable? I could probably install the controller myself.


What sort of power gains could I expect?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 10:49 PM
  #28  
livevil904's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Also, btw, 184 RWHP would be 216 flywheel horsepower, not 211.

184 = (.85)(HP)
184/(.85) = HP
216.5 ~ HP

Sorry, I'm a math major and so I couldn't help correcting that.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2013 | 07:50 AM
  #29  
julesfc3s's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Québec
QC

great numbers. I'm building almost the same setup with an s5 intake and I port my exhauts with pinnaple template. I'm realy curious how much I will pull. I'll keep you updated
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2014 | 09:58 PM
  #30  
ibeljin's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
its impressive to see what people can do with the NA motors. Put a turbo on damn near anything and it will make power, building a good NA more challenging
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Oct 8, 2015 10:09 PM
PinkRacer
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
43
Oct 1, 2015 09:13 AM
CWA
Introduce yourself
0
Sep 23, 2015 12:59 PM
RX200013B
Haltech Forum
6
Sep 23, 2015 08:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.