15.2 NA mostly stock
03-03-04, 05:06 PM
#3
Is that thing Turbo?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
6500 rmp launch on bald 205s, power shifted at redline from 1st to second, and shifted soft at 6800 from 2nd to 3rd (have to shift soft, my syncro is bad in 3rd)
Trending Topics
03-19-04, 10:08 PM
#9
777** The Anti-rice
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Mr. HKS
i had s4 base model with intake/exhaust and tied open 6ports, took out air pump, did a 14.92 1/4mile
i had s4 base model with intake/exhaust and tied open 6ports, took out air pump, did a 14.92 1/4mile
Yeah right. wiring ports open with just intake and exhaust wouldnt get you 14
03-20-04, 12:26 AM
#11
Is that thing Turbo?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my first run was a 15.5 i was stoked, then i launched at 7 instead of 5 and i ran a 15.2 lol ohh yeah my car was full interior (not much to it on a base) and it wieghed 2550 lbs
DEZERT I wouldn't be so sure about that why not? I ran a 15.2 and thats not that much faster considering I ran that with completely bald tires, and they are 205, I expect like a 15.0 when i get my new 245s
DEZERT I wouldn't be so sure about that why not? I ran a 15.2 and thats not that much faster considering I ran that with completely bald tires, and they are 205, I expect like a 15.0 when i get my new 245s
Last edited by totallimmortal; 03-20-04 at 12:28 AM.
03-22-04, 11:34 AM
#15
Is that thing Turbo?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by zinx
No, you only lose torque in low RPMs. If you are in low RPMs when racing, you're doing it wrong.
No, you only lose torque in low RPMs. If you are in low RPMs when racing, you're doing it wrong.
03-22-04, 06:24 PM
#17
88 AE
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by totallimmortal
I'm glad some1 else knows this i'm tired of hearing all the low tourqe loss stuff it may be there but if you want to go fast you don't use low rpms
I'm glad some1 else knows this i'm tired of hearing all the low tourqe loss stuff it may be there but if you want to go fast you don't use low rpms
03-23-04, 06:10 AM
#19
Rotorphile.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Richmond/NoVA
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Ocelot
I was under the impression that NA's ran a lot slower like low 16's, high 15's with just intake/exhaust.
I was under the impression that NA's ran a lot slower like low 16's, high 15's with just intake/exhaust.
04-11-04, 12:38 PM
#20
My cars louder than yours
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a mid 14 car on stock ports with Intake and exhaust (mild weight reduction). i think best was 14.6, call the BS flag and ill show you a sea of consistant slips (ran by my buddy and now DSM punk Detruich).
04-23-04, 05:46 PM
#24
Im Ron Burgandy..
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not been to the track my self just yet, not since i killed my SVT focus. it ran a 10.4 with a slow *** 1.22 sec RT. hopefully i can get about that in my stock 87 gsl. minus the slow *** RT! oh... its an 8th mile track.
04-23-04, 05:59 PM
#25
Lives on the Forum
WTH, at 89mph traps at 2700# - that's like 150hp at the wheels or almost 200bhp at the flywheel???
Even with an S5 engine rated at 160bhp, that's a 30hp gain from the exhaust and intake???
http://www.turbofast.com.au/Drag.html
You can mess around with this - the numbers are pretty close.
HP is rwhp.
-Ted
Even with an S5 engine rated at 160bhp, that's a 30hp gain from the exhaust and intake???
http://www.turbofast.com.au/Drag.html
You can mess around with this - the numbers are pretty close.
HP is rwhp.
-Ted