Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

I did it again.......125mph on stock twin turbos!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 03:18 PM
  #51  
Yellow R1's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 507
Likes: 1
From: Ponte Vedra, FL
My CYM goes on the dyno soon (after I put my pulleys on) and you will all be crushed as it will easily exceed 405 RWHP (and if you believe that, I've got some land in Florida I can sell ya).

Seriously, the 400 RWHP or so some of you guys are getting is amazing. Very good tuning guys!

I'll post my numbers in a few weeks for kicks (it ain't gonna reach 400 RWHP though!)

-Matt
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 12:28 PM
  #52  
RTS3GEN's Avatar
The Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit Mo.
Wow! Nice numbers Boostn7, sure shows what good tuning will do. I have almost the same setup with a Pettit unlimited ecu and managed to eek out an 11.7 at 116.7 mph. So a smart/safe map will net roughly 45 more hp with a power FC ....HMMMMM(taps finger on temple)

Art
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 09:02 PM
  #53  
fastrx7man's Avatar
Looking for 10's
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,568
Likes: 1
From: Lantana, Texas
I have to do some more tuning... and maybe run a little more boost.

Those are awesome numbers...congrats!!!

All I want is to run in the 11's on my non-ported motor...
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2003 | 04:45 PM
  #54  
fastrx7man's Avatar
Looking for 10's
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,568
Likes: 1
From: Lantana, Texas
I think low 11's can happen with my car. My new goal by Christmas is a 11.5 et.

I made three 11 second passes last night before I broke an axel.

The first was a 11.999 @ 116.94 with a 1.6945 60'.
The second was a 11.7927 @ 118.61 with a 1.6646 60'.
The third was a 11.7838 @ 117.96 with a 1.6730 60'.
The forth was a broken axle

Mohammad thanks for the AWESOME TUNING

www.mzmperformance.com
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 03:55 AM
  #55  
fd3s93's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: LA,California
wow! nice #'s .. are you running them on stock rims?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 02:39 PM
  #56  
tcb100's Avatar
DinoDude
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Harpers Ferry, West Virginia
According to the RX & Archives, the "Big List", in 1996 Kevin Wyum ran 11.13 @125 with "upgraded twins".

That is "uncorrected" I assume.

Anybody explain what "corrrected" means?

Last edited by tcb100; Nov 25, 2003 at 02:44 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 18, 2015 10:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.