Spring Rates (Standard Springs vs 2.5" ID Springs)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spring Rates (Standard Springs vs 2.5" ID Springs)
I have been doing a little research to clarify some confusion I am encountering with spring rates. It is my understanding that you cannot compare spring rates of standard (stock strut size springs) with 2.5" I.D. Race Springs. Is this true?
If so is there a conversion formula to compare "ride feel" on different type springs? For Example would a Racing Beat Front spring of 145# spring compare to a 2.5" ID 7" spring at 250#? THere must be a difference, because standard springs are more than 7" or 8" tall which is a common length for an ID race spring, so the higher spring rate makes sence, because more pounds are required to compress the spring an inch.
Am I making any sence? I am confused? Someone please Help. The reason I am wondering is because I just ordered a set of Ground Control Camber Caster Plates, with the weld in Coil Over Kit. I didn't know which spring rate to get so they recommended a 7" 250# spring, as I told them I had Racing beat 110# springs in the rear.
THanks for any help,
Spinner-D
If so is there a conversion formula to compare "ride feel" on different type springs? For Example would a Racing Beat Front spring of 145# spring compare to a 2.5" ID 7" spring at 250#? THere must be a difference, because standard springs are more than 7" or 8" tall which is a common length for an ID race spring, so the higher spring rate makes sence, because more pounds are required to compress the spring an inch.
Am I making any sence? I am confused? Someone please Help. The reason I am wondering is because I just ordered a set of Ground Control Camber Caster Plates, with the weld in Coil Over Kit. I didn't know which spring rate to get so they recommended a 7" 250# spring, as I told them I had Racing beat 110# springs in the rear.
THanks for any help,
Spinner-D
#2
Lives on the Forum
Spring rate is spring rate. Doesn't matter the diameter, length, number of coils, torsion spring, coil spring, leaf spring etc.
You can directly compare the spring rate of any spring to the spring rate of any other type of spring; it's the same.
You can directly compare the spring rate of any spring to the spring rate of any other type of spring; it's the same.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not according to Ground Control you can't.
Anyone else know what I mean? Obviously Spring Rates are spring rates, and can be compared, but my question was what is the ride feel on a 145# stock diameter spring compared to a 250# 2.5" ID spring? Or what would the ride feel be of a 145# stock spring to a 145# 2.5" ID spring?
Anyone else know what I mean? Obviously Spring Rates are spring rates, and can be compared, but my question was what is the ride feel on a 145# stock diameter spring compared to a 250# 2.5" ID spring? Or what would the ride feel be of a 145# stock spring to a 145# 2.5" ID spring?
#4
Lives on the Forum
Originally posted by Spinner-D(eluxe)
Or what would the ride feel be of a 145# stock spring to a 145# 2.5" ID spring?
Or what would the ride feel be of a 145# stock spring to a 145# 2.5" ID spring?
Originally posted by Spinner-D(eluxe)
what is the ride feel on a 145# stock diameter spring compared to a 250# 2.5" ID spring
what is the ride feel on a 145# stock diameter spring compared to a 250# 2.5" ID spring
Originally posted by Spinner-D(eluxe)
Not according to Ground Control you can't.
Not according to Ground Control you can't.
A 145 pound spring that is 6" long and 2.5" in diameter is the exact same stiffness as a 145 pound spring that is 10" long and 5" in diameter; they will feel exactly the same when installed on the car.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK I guess Ground Control must have said that because they assumed I had progressive springs, but Racing Beat Springs are supposed to be linier, unlike Suspension Techniques Progressive springs.
Ok so now that that is settled, is a 250# spring in front ok for auto-x suspension? I have 110# springs in the rear. Is that a good match or too stiff up front or too soft in the rear?
If it matters the tires I am on are 225/45-15's, and I usually run 35lbs of pressure.
Ok so now that that is settled, is a 250# spring in front ok for auto-x suspension? I have 110# springs in the rear. Is that a good match or too stiff up front or too soft in the rear?
If it matters the tires I am on are 225/45-15's, and I usually run 35lbs of pressure.
#6
This is interesting to me.I just replaced my racing beat linear rate springs with a ground control setup. The eibachs that I asked for were 500 front and 400 rear.
The ride is considerably softer than the racing beats. It is more comfortable, turn in is not as sharp. It seems to me that these are not as stiff? Or they are non linear?
Matt
The ride is considerably softer than the racing beats. It is more comfortable, turn in is not as sharp. It seems to me that these are not as stiff? Or they are non linear?
Matt
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ebb
This is interesting to me.I just replaced my racing beat linear rate springs with a ground control setup. The eibachs that I asked for were 500 front and 400 rear.
The ride is considerably softer than the racing beats. It is more comfortable, turn in is not as sharp. It seems to me that these are not as stiff? Or they are non linear?
Matt
This is interesting to me.I just replaced my racing beat linear rate springs with a ground control setup. The eibachs that I asked for were 500 front and 400 rear.
The ride is considerably softer than the racing beats. It is more comfortable, turn in is not as sharp. It seems to me that these are not as stiff? Or they are non linear?
Matt
Anybody have an explinaton for this???
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK so Ground control forgot to ship springs with my kit, so instead of getting the 250# for the front, I asked them to send me 350#'s for the front, and 175#'s for the rear. That should be good aye?
#10
Originally posted by ebb
This is interesting to me.I just replaced my racing beat linear rate springs with a ground control setup. The eibachs that I asked for were 500 front and 400 rear.
The ride is considerably softer than the racing beats. It is more comfortable, turn in is not as sharp. It seems to me that these are not as stiff? Or they are non linear?
Matt
This is interesting to me.I just replaced my racing beat linear rate springs with a ground control setup. The eibachs that I asked for were 500 front and 400 rear.
The ride is considerably softer than the racing beats. It is more comfortable, turn in is not as sharp. It seems to me that these are not as stiff? Or they are non linear?
Matt
-Max
#11
Yes Max, same shocks. The springs do have an eibach part number on them, at the end it says either 400 or 500. This is what we discussed on the phone when I called to order. In the box they wrote which ones to put on rear and front. 500 in front of course.
I can get the exact part number if you think it makes a difference.
I was not complaining about them, just noticed my ride felt softer than the racing beats.
-Matt
I can get the exact part number if you think it makes a difference.
I was not complaining about them, just noticed my ride felt softer than the racing beats.
-Matt
#12
ebb, it sounds like you got the right ones. I don't need the part number -- just making sure the rates match what you ordered.
I don't have any explanation for why they would feel softer than the RBs.
-Max
I don't have any explanation for why they would feel softer than the RBs.
-Max
#13
Lives on the Forum
You have to be careful with spring rates. Some vendors quote wheel rates (as spring rates), which will be 4 to 5-fold LOWER than the actual spring rate because of the suspension's lever action against the spring. Thus a 110-lb/in wheel rate spring could actually be a 440- or 550-lb/inch spring rate.
Suspension tuning is a complicated topic. Those thinking of buying new suspension components should read up on the subject (Carroll Smith's tuning series of books). Many vendors aren't necessarily up on the subject; their aim is to sell product, and let the customer deal with tuning.
ebb, from your description the springs might be progressive rate springs?
OC, yes you can measure the spring rate of progressive rate springs, and plot the rate as a function of load. With linear rate springs you get a straight line (y = mx + b); with a progressive rate spring you get a curve described by a nonlinear differential equation.
Suspension tuning is a complicated topic. Those thinking of buying new suspension components should read up on the subject (Carroll Smith's tuning series of books). Many vendors aren't necessarily up on the subject; their aim is to sell product, and let the customer deal with tuning.
ebb, from your description the springs might be progressive rate springs?
OC, yes you can measure the spring rate of progressive rate springs, and plot the rate as a function of load. With linear rate springs you get a straight line (y = mx + b); with a progressive rate spring you get a curve described by a nonlinear differential equation.
Last edited by SleepR1; 02-15-04 at 10:24 AM.