Post Pics of your FD Wheel Fitment!!
11-28-13, 08:18 PM
#1876
Ok so if i know i have 9.5" wheels then they are 241.3mm wide divide by 2 and i get 120.65 I measured from the rim edge where the rim width is actually measured and got 5" which is 139.7
120.65-139.7 gives me a +6 offset for my rear 9.5" wheel
Now Im having trouble finding what offset would be equivalent if i bought 10.5" wide wheels.
I think i found that a 17x10.5 +20 or if i go 17x11 +26 would make then stick out equivalent to what i have now
120.65-139.7 gives me a +6 offset for my rear 9.5" wheel
Now Im having trouble finding what offset would be equivalent if i bought 10.5" wide wheels.
I think i found that a 17x10.5 +20 or if i go 17x11 +26 would make then stick out equivalent to what i have now
11-28-13, 09:38 PM
#1877
I looked at her video and everything is spot on. Nothing incorrect there.
Wheel edges are always 0.5" each, so for instance if the wheel is made as a 10'' it should give you 11'' measured from outside both edges.
now to compare wheel widths and offsets use this tool : Equivalent Arch Clearance Calculator | Wheel offset and fitment comparison tools
look at the top right corner for 2 additional very useful tools.
Wheel edges are always 0.5" each, so for instance if the wheel is made as a 10'' it should give you 11'' measured from outside both edges.
now to compare wheel widths and offsets use this tool : Equivalent Arch Clearance Calculator | Wheel offset and fitment comparison tools
look at the top right corner for 2 additional very useful tools.
11-28-13, 10:30 PM
#1879
I looked at her video and everything is spot on. Nothing incorrect there.
Wheel edges are always 0.5" each, so for instance if the wheel is made as a 10'' it should give you 11'' measured from outside both edges.
now to compare wheel widths and offsets use this tool : Equivalent Arch Clearance Calculator | Wheel offset and fitment comparison tools
look at the top right corner for 2 additional very useful tools.
Wheel edges are always 0.5" each, so for instance if the wheel is made as a 10'' it should give you 11'' measured from outside both edges.
now to compare wheel widths and offsets use this tool : Equivalent Arch Clearance Calculator | Wheel offset and fitment comparison tools
look at the top right corner for 2 additional very useful tools.
11-29-13, 06:01 PM
#1881
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
given.
Your wheel is a "+6 offset for my rear 9.5" wheel"
So given this information, you want the edge of the wheel to be the same spot.
(9.5 *25.4)/2 = 120.65MM to the centerpoint of your wheel. if you have +6MM offset then the edge of the wheel is 114.65mm from the edge of the hub.
if you want to maintain the 114.65mm from the edge of the hub, then you back calculate using the math above.
(10.5*25.4)/2 = 133.35 (subtract edge 114.65mm) = 18.7MM offset
10.5" wide wheels
Offset 18.7mm
11" wide wheel
Offset 25.05mm
let me know if you need me to figure out where the location of your tire is with respect to your hub and what tire you should run with the new offset to be in the same location.
11-30-13, 01:52 AM
#1882
Thank you for your help
easy math
given.
Your wheel is a "+6 offset for my rear 9.5" wheel"
So given this information, you want the edge of the wheel to be the same spot.
(9.5 *25.4)/2 = 120.65MM to the centerpoint of your wheel. if you have +6MM offset then the edge of the wheel is 114.65mm from the edge of the hub.
if you want to maintain the 114.65mm from the edge of the hub, then you back calculate using the math above.
(10.5*25.4)/2 = 133.35 (subtract edge 114.65mm) = 18.7MM offset
10.5" wide wheels
Offset 18.7mm
11" wide wheel
Offset 25.05mm
let me know if you need me to figure out where the location of your tire is with respect to your hub and what tire you should run with the new offset to be in the same location.
given.
Your wheel is a "+6 offset for my rear 9.5" wheel"
So given this information, you want the edge of the wheel to be the same spot.
(9.5 *25.4)/2 = 120.65MM to the centerpoint of your wheel. if you have +6MM offset then the edge of the wheel is 114.65mm from the edge of the hub.
if you want to maintain the 114.65mm from the edge of the hub, then you back calculate using the math above.
(10.5*25.4)/2 = 133.35 (subtract edge 114.65mm) = 18.7MM offset
10.5" wide wheels
Offset 18.7mm
11" wide wheel
Offset 25.05mm
let me know if you need me to figure out where the location of your tire is with respect to your hub and what tire you should run with the new offset to be in the same location.
hahaha I could probably bullsh~t half the specs.
12-05-13, 02:22 PM
#1891
idk if ppl are in the the meaty look but here is a front pic of my fd sittin on 18x10 on +25mm 265/35. and yes i rolled and pulled the **** out of the fenders but i kept the curves of the fd. let me kno what u think. still waitin on rear tires gonna run 295/30 +25mm just waitin on the tires to hurry up and get here.
12-05-13, 03:02 PM
#1893
idk if ppl are in the the meaty look but here is a front pic of my fd sittin on 18x10 on +25mm 265/35. and yes i rolled and pulled the **** out of the fenders but i kept the curves of the fd. let me kno what u think. still waitin on rear tires gonna run 295/30 +25mm just waitin on the tires to hurry up and get here.
I'm just being ****
12-06-13, 09:56 PM
#1895
I agree with Deesan.
265 on a 10 is not bad but if you want to have balance with the rear, the 295/30 will sit lower than the 265/35
I use to refuse to get into that specially when i was looking for tires for my new setups but i had to learn the hard way lol.
A 255 wont really be stretched on the 10, it will give you a nice "square" look rather than a "mushroom"
Nothing wrong with a mushroom look unless you are doing the same on the rear.
265 on a 10 is not bad but if you want to have balance with the rear, the 295/30 will sit lower than the 265/35
I use to refuse to get into that specially when i was looking for tires for my new setups but i had to learn the hard way lol.
A 255 wont really be stretched on the 10, it will give you a nice "square" look rather than a "mushroom"
Nothing wrong with a mushroom look unless you are doing the same on the rear.
12-07-13, 03:41 PM
#1896
I agree with Deesan.
265 on a 10 is not bad but if you want to have balance with the rear, the 295/30 will sit lower than the 265/35
I use to refuse to get into that specially when i was looking for tires for my new setups but i had to learn the hard way lol.
A 255 wont really be stretched on the 10, it will give you a nice "square" look rather than a "mushroom"
Nothing wrong with a mushroom look unless you are doing the same on the rear.
265 on a 10 is not bad but if you want to have balance with the rear, the 295/30 will sit lower than the 265/35
I use to refuse to get into that specially when i was looking for tires for my new setups but i had to learn the hard way lol.
A 255 wont really be stretched on the 10, it will give you a nice "square" look rather than a "mushroom"
Nothing wrong with a mushroom look unless you are doing the same on the rear.
12-07-13, 04:25 PM
#1897
Rezaxx II
10x10.5-19
10x12-40 with 15mm spacer
18x10.5 -19 ?
18x12 -55 ?
So with the outside wheel face in the same place and the wheel well filled up toward the suspension-
you could run
18x13.5 +15 295/30-18
18x16 -5 335/30-18
That would be pretty baller.
10x10.5-19
10x12-40 with 15mm spacer
18x10.5 -19 ?
18x12 -55 ?
So with the outside wheel face in the same place and the wheel well filled up toward the suspension-
you could run
18x13.5 +15 295/30-18
18x16 -5 335/30-18
That would be pretty baller.
