if i want to run 17 x 10s in the rear and 17 x 9s in the front
02-28-05, 11:16 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if i want to run 17 x 10s in the rear and 17 x 9s in the front
what offset would be best? i don't have a problem rolling my fenders, if need be.
03-01-05, 12:13 AM
#3
Gone Darkside
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Irmo, SC USA
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd suggest contacting Rishie at AutoRnD. He's great with fitment suggestions. He has a thread over on NoPistons that addresses various FD possibilities.
Hope this helps!
reese
Hope this helps!
reese
03-02-05, 04:15 AM
#4
Depends on the wheel you want. The closest you can get to +50 the better. Email me or PM me sales@autornd.com if you want to go over functions and posssible suggetions for wheels that will fit in those widths. We need to figure out tire sizing first.
Rishie
Rishie
03-03-05, 06:01 PM
#5
Rotary Enthusiast
I bought a set of CCWs last month...they were 17x10" and 17x9" (actual width is 11/10"). Putting them on this weekend.
Backspacing were 7.5" rear and 7.00" front.
My 94 has stock suspension.
Will post picture this weekend. If it doesn't rain.
Backspacing were 7.5" rear and 7.00" front.
My 94 has stock suspension.
Will post picture this weekend. If it doesn't rain.
03-03-05, 08:08 PM
#6
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
also depends on if you're trying to widen your track, trying to get super flush with stretched tires, going for the widest tires possible etc. the +50 recommendations are safest and will allow the biggest tires. the lowest the japanese seem to go with stretched tires is around 17x10+35 and 17x9+35. i'm sure that takes some camber and rolled fenders.
