GAB Super R's vs. Konis vs. Teins
#1
GAB Super R's vs. Konis vs. Teins
I have a new set of GAB Super R shocks that I had originally planned on using with M2's coilover kit but am now having second thoughts. For the money that I will have in the shocks and sleeve-type coilover kit, I could have bought a "genuine" set of coilovers from a company like Tein. The Koni coilovers set-ups that I have seen on the internet are sleeve types as well, but many people swear by these shocks. I am looking for feedback from anyone who has experience with any of these shocks or, ideally, has tried all three set-ups. I know that many people aren't fond of sleeve-type coilovers, but if Konis are raved about so much and they are sleeve-types themselves... As far as models of packages I have been looking at, they are as follows:
1. GAB Super Rs with M2's coilover kit at probably 550/450 spring ratings.
2. Konis either Tripoint or True Choice with their Eibach coilover kit at an undecided spring rate.
3. Tein's RA or RE (leaning towards the REs) "true" coilover kit. The wierd (so I thought) note about Tein's kits are that they come with such high 859/859 spring rates. Lower spring rates are available, of course, but at $50-60 per spring.
The car is not a daily driver so I am willing to compromise ride quality for performance. It sees the occasional autox and track day as well.
What kind of opinions does everyone have?
Thanks in advance.
-Kyle
1. GAB Super Rs with M2's coilover kit at probably 550/450 spring ratings.
2. Konis either Tripoint or True Choice with their Eibach coilover kit at an undecided spring rate.
3. Tein's RA or RE (leaning towards the REs) "true" coilover kit. The wierd (so I thought) note about Tein's kits are that they come with such high 859/859 spring rates. Lower spring rates are available, of course, but at $50-60 per spring.
The car is not a daily driver so I am willing to compromise ride quality for performance. It sees the occasional autox and track day as well.
What kind of opinions does everyone have?
Thanks in advance.
-Kyle
#2
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (22)
What about JIC? You won't need to pay for those extra springs, plus they revalve the dampers.
The Tein RE is comparable but much more stiff. Designed for track only purposes. Unless you live on a frozen lake. hehe
Plus they're cheaper, fully anodized and aluminum bodies.
Rishie\\
Either way, go with a true coilover. Especially something with independent ride height and preload functions.
The Tein RE is comparable but much more stiff. Designed for track only purposes. Unless you live on a frozen lake. hehe
Plus they're cheaper, fully anodized and aluminum bodies.
Rishie\\
Either way, go with a true coilover. Especially something with independent ride height and preload functions.
#3
Ghost Ride the Whip
I have option number 1 with the gab super r's and ground control 550/450 (same as m2 coilover sleeve). The car handles pretty good and i'm happy with it.
I have two friends, one with the TEIN RE and one with the TEIN HA. Both of them actaully handle better and are higher quality. I got my set at a super good deal, but if I had to pay full price, I would have definitely have gone with the TEIN's. Contact OSdesigns for details, he can offer the most competitive pricing
I have two friends, one with the TEIN RE and one with the TEIN HA. Both of them actaully handle better and are higher quality. I got my set at a super good deal, but if I had to pay full price, I would have definitely have gone with the TEIN's. Contact OSdesigns for details, he can offer the most competitive pricing
#4
Rishie,
While I have heard the brand name JIC a few times, I am not familiar with their craftsmanship, quality and performance. I have only heard one person's opinion so I won't make any assumptions/conclusions about them. What are the spring rates, adjustability levels and so forth on the JICs?
To all,
While the Tein's seem to be what I am leaning towards, I am wondering if an 859/859 spring rate front/rear is going to be optimal. And if not, I wonder what would be.
While I am willing to compromise ride quality for ultimate performance, I am not willing to compromise the durability of the suspension. I was, and still am, interested in the Tein N1 damper, but as I called Tein USA, they stated that it is track ONLY, saying that I would probably blow seals in the damper if driven on the street.
So, the best performance I can buy, with the best quality and craftsmanship, but at the same time, with the most durability also. That's one of the reasons I went with the GAB Super Rs to begin with, as I had known them to be very durable with primo performance.
Thanks.
-Kyle
While I have heard the brand name JIC a few times, I am not familiar with their craftsmanship, quality and performance. I have only heard one person's opinion so I won't make any assumptions/conclusions about them. What are the spring rates, adjustability levels and so forth on the JICs?
To all,
While the Tein's seem to be what I am leaning towards, I am wondering if an 859/859 spring rate front/rear is going to be optimal. And if not, I wonder what would be.
While I am willing to compromise ride quality for ultimate performance, I am not willing to compromise the durability of the suspension. I was, and still am, interested in the Tein N1 damper, but as I called Tein USA, they stated that it is track ONLY, saying that I would probably blow seals in the damper if driven on the street.
So, the best performance I can buy, with the best quality and craftsmanship, but at the same time, with the most durability also. That's one of the reasons I went with the GAB Super Rs to begin with, as I had known them to be very durable with primo performance.
Thanks.
-Kyle
#5
Ghost Ride the Whip
While the Tein's seem to be what I am leaning towards, I am wondering if an 859/859 spring rate front/rear is going to be optimal. And if not, I wonder what would be
#6
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
I really know nothing about suspension tuning, but what are the consequences of having an 859/859 front/rear spring rate on the Teins REs? Does the fact that the front/rear rates are the same mean the car will oversteer more? Is one supposed to compensate these coilovers with another set of sway bars? Why didnt Tein keep the ratio of front/back rates the same as the Tein HAs which are like 550/450?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't answer the question about the why Tein has the same spring rate for the front as they do in the rear but I think the HA's have a much lower spring rate. More of a cushie ride.
Rishie- I talked with you a while ago about the JIC's. Can you pick the spring rate in that suspension? Can JIC rebuild the dampeners in the US or do they have to be sent to Japan?
Rishie- I talked with you a while ago about the JIC's. Can you pick the spring rate in that suspension? Can JIC rebuild the dampeners in the US or do they have to be sent to Japan?
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by Aristo
I really know nothing about suspension tuning, but what are the consequences of having an 859/859 front/rear spring rate on the Teins REs? Does the fact that the front/rear rates are the same mean the car will oversteer more? Is one supposed to compensate these coilovers with another set of sway bars? Why didnt Tein keep the ratio of front/back rates the same as the Tein HAs which are like 550/450?
I really know nothing about suspension tuning, but what are the consequences of having an 859/859 front/rear spring rate on the Teins REs? Does the fact that the front/rear rates are the same mean the car will oversteer more? Is one supposed to compensate these coilovers with another set of sway bars? Why didnt Tein keep the ratio of front/back rates the same as the Tein HAs which are like 550/450?
You will get a bunch of oversteer with those springs on a stock car unless you tune it out with other stuff. That actually makes the rear "wheel rate" (the stiffness at the wheel) higher than the front. The motion ratios are about 1.6F and 1.4R -- if you are really interested in digging into the details that will be useful information. A number of things could make those rates appropriate. A really, really stiff front sway bar. Rear tires that are much wider than the fronts. A rearward weight bias, perhaps from adding ballast, a huge fuel tank, more of the cage structure in the back, change the suspension geometry such that the motion ratios are closer, etc.
-Max
#9
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Ok Max, what you say makes sense..but it seems the only variables that one can reasonably adjust are beefing up the front sway bar, and putting more weight on the back of the car. Like the Tein REs, the newer versions of the HKS coilovers run a 10kg/10kg spring rate. Could it be that these setups are meant to be run with the rear end of the car lowered enough so that there is enough weight transfer to the back? I would think there would have to be a lot of additional weight in the back to make up for this.
#10
Originally posted by Aristo
Ok Max, what you say makes sense..but it seems the only variables that one can reasonably adjust are beefing up the front sway bar, and putting more weight on the back of the car. Like the Tein REs, the newer versions of the HKS coilovers run a 10kg/10kg spring rate. Could it be that these setups are meant to be run with the rear end of the car lowered enough so that there is enough weight transfer to the back? I would think there would have to be a lot of additional weight in the back to make up for this.
Ok Max, what you say makes sense..but it seems the only variables that one can reasonably adjust are beefing up the front sway bar, and putting more weight on the back of the car. Like the Tein REs, the newer versions of the HKS coilovers run a 10kg/10kg spring rate. Could it be that these setups are meant to be run with the rear end of the car lowered enough so that there is enough weight transfer to the back? I would think there would have to be a lot of additional weight in the back to make up for this.
Are the systems with the same spring rated F/R intended for street cars? It might be that they are meant for race cars with different setups than the stock car.
You can get some really beefy front sway bars. Couple that with no rear bar or a light rear bar (stock 94 or just your current stock bar) and it might be enough to balance the car. Wider rear tires may also help get the car into balance with these setups.
Again, this is just my speculation and is not based on any actual experience with the coil-overs in question. I did run a 550/450 spring setup for a while and found the rear end loose using the stock sway bars. The spring rates actually seem "right" (simialr wheel rates F/R for 50/50 car) but I think you need a stiff sway bar in front to make it easy to drive.
-Max
#12
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (22)
The JIC's can be rebuilt in house at Ziel Motorsports. You can actually select the valving and spring rates you desire. IF you want a drag setup, roadrace, street/track. All of these can be done. An infinite number of options there.
The JIC FLTA2's in JDM spec also have symmetrical spring rates front and rear. They were around 14kg.
Laters, Rishie
The JIC FLTA2's in JDM spec also have symmetrical spring rates front and rear. They were around 14kg.
Laters, Rishie
#16
Ghost Ride the Whip
one of my friends have the Tein RE and another one has the HKS hiper damper. The Tein RE is very very stiff, but the HKS is perfectly streetable and handles very well. The shocks are 38 way stiffness adjustable (from the top of the shock tower) so you can virtually make them as soft as a stock rx7
Does anybody here have the HKS Hiperdamper IIs or the Tein REs, and if so could you please tell us your impressions of the way they make the car handle?
#19
Have never relly heard anyhting good about JIC but I have the Tein HA's and they are fine for street use and track. Actually most people think that they are too stiff for the street with the 10K/8K springs in them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joel(PA)
Race Car Tech
0
10-01-15 10:25 AM