Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

GAB Super R's vs. Konis vs. Teins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 01:38 AM
  #1  
Mazderati's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 554
Likes: 17
From: KDJFKL
GAB Super R's vs. Konis vs. Teins

I have a new set of GAB Super R shocks that I had originally planned on using with M2's coilover kit but am now having second thoughts. For the money that I will have in the shocks and sleeve-type coilover kit, I could have bought a "genuine" set of coilovers from a company like Tein. The Koni coilovers set-ups that I have seen on the internet are sleeve types as well, but many people swear by these shocks. I am looking for feedback from anyone who has experience with any of these shocks or, ideally, has tried all three set-ups. I know that many people aren't fond of sleeve-type coilovers, but if Konis are raved about so much and they are sleeve-types themselves... As far as models of packages I have been looking at, they are as follows:

1. GAB Super Rs with M2's coilover kit at probably 550/450 spring ratings.

2. Konis either Tripoint or True Choice with their Eibach coilover kit at an undecided spring rate.

3. Tein's RA or RE (leaning towards the REs) "true" coilover kit. The wierd (so I thought) note about Tein's kits are that they come with such high 859/859 spring rates. Lower spring rates are available, of course, but at $50-60 per spring.

The car is not a daily driver so I am willing to compromise ride quality for performance. It sees the occasional autox and track day as well.

What kind of opinions does everyone have?

Thanks in advance.


-Kyle
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 01:52 AM
  #2  
ARD T2's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 17
From: Silicon Valley, CA.
What about JIC? You won't need to pay for those extra springs, plus they revalve the dampers.

The Tein RE is comparable but much more stiff. Designed for track only purposes. Unless you live on a frozen lake. hehe

Plus they're cheaper, fully anodized and aluminum bodies.

Rishie\\

Either way, go with a true coilover. Especially something with independent ride height and preload functions.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 01:54 AM
  #3  
1FooknTiteFD's Avatar
Ghost Ride the Whip
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
I have option number 1 with the gab super r's and ground control 550/450 (same as m2 coilover sleeve). The car handles pretty good and i'm happy with it.

I have two friends, one with the TEIN RE and one with the TEIN HA. Both of them actaully handle better and are higher quality. I got my set at a super good deal, but if I had to pay full price, I would have definitely have gone with the TEIN's. Contact OSdesigns for details, he can offer the most competitive pricing
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 09:01 AM
  #4  
Mazderati's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 554
Likes: 17
From: KDJFKL
Rishie,

While I have heard the brand name JIC a few times, I am not familiar with their craftsmanship, quality and performance. I have only heard one person's opinion so I won't make any assumptions/conclusions about them. What are the spring rates, adjustability levels and so forth on the JICs?

To all,

While the Tein's seem to be what I am leaning towards, I am wondering if an 859/859 spring rate front/rear is going to be optimal. And if not, I wonder what would be.

While I am willing to compromise ride quality for ultimate performance, I am not willing to compromise the durability of the suspension. I was, and still am, interested in the Tein N1 damper, but as I called Tein USA, they stated that it is track ONLY, saying that I would probably blow seals in the damper if driven on the street.

So, the best performance I can buy, with the best quality and craftsmanship, but at the same time, with the most durability also. That's one of the reasons I went with the GAB Super Rs to begin with, as I had known them to be very durable with primo performance.

Thanks.

-Kyle
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 10:04 PM
  #5  
1FooknTiteFD's Avatar
Ghost Ride the Whip
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
While the Tein's seem to be what I am leaning towards, I am wondering if an 859/859 spring rate front/rear is going to be optimal. And if not, I wonder what would be
kyle, 859 foot lbs springs are not very optimal unless your car is a track queen. The RE's come with that spring rate but you can get them with 550/450's (optimal in my opinion) if you want. 850 is too stiff for street, your ride quality will suffer and also if you drive your car on the street alot, you may even tweak your frame easily driving over these messed up roads all the time too
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 06:57 PM
  #6  
Aristo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 654
Likes: 9
From: Sherman Oaks CA
I really know nothing about suspension tuning, but what are the consequences of having an 859/859 front/rear spring rate on the Teins REs? Does the fact that the front/rear rates are the same mean the car will oversteer more? Is one supposed to compensate these coilovers with another set of sway bars? Why didnt Tein keep the ratio of front/back rates the same as the Tein HAs which are like 550/450?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 08:30 PM
  #7  
DavidR's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
I can't answer the question about the why Tein has the same spring rate for the front as they do in the rear but I think the HA's have a much lower spring rate. More of a cushie ride.
Rishie- I talked with you a while ago about the JIC's. Can you pick the spring rate in that suspension? Can JIC rebuild the dampeners in the US or do they have to be sent to Japan?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 10:22 PM
  #8  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally posted by Aristo
I really know nothing about suspension tuning, but what are the consequences of having an 859/859 front/rear spring rate on the Teins REs? Does the fact that the front/rear rates are the same mean the car will oversteer more? Is one supposed to compensate these coilovers with another set of sway bars? Why didnt Tein keep the ratio of front/back rates the same as the Tein HAs which are like 550/450?
I am totally guessing here, so don't take this as anything other than speculation but...

You will get a bunch of oversteer with those springs on a stock car unless you tune it out with other stuff. That actually makes the rear "wheel rate" (the stiffness at the wheel) higher than the front. The motion ratios are about 1.6F and 1.4R -- if you are really interested in digging into the details that will be useful information. A number of things could make those rates appropriate. A really, really stiff front sway bar. Rear tires that are much wider than the fronts. A rearward weight bias, perhaps from adding ballast, a huge fuel tank, more of the cage structure in the back, change the suspension geometry such that the motion ratios are closer, etc.

-Max
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2002 | 01:32 AM
  #9  
Aristo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 654
Likes: 9
From: Sherman Oaks CA
Ok Max, what you say makes sense..but it seems the only variables that one can reasonably adjust are beefing up the front sway bar, and putting more weight on the back of the car. Like the Tein REs, the newer versions of the HKS coilovers run a 10kg/10kg spring rate. Could it be that these setups are meant to be run with the rear end of the car lowered enough so that there is enough weight transfer to the back? I would think there would have to be a lot of additional weight in the back to make up for this.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2002 | 04:27 AM
  #10  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally posted by Aristo
Ok Max, what you say makes sense..but it seems the only variables that one can reasonably adjust are beefing up the front sway bar, and putting more weight on the back of the car. Like the Tein REs, the newer versions of the HKS coilovers run a 10kg/10kg spring rate. Could it be that these setups are meant to be run with the rear end of the car lowered enough so that there is enough weight transfer to the back? I would think there would have to be a lot of additional weight in the back to make up for this.
Lowering the rear won't change the weight distribution noticably, and lowering the CG will reduce weight transfer (not the same thing as weight distribution anway). I don't think you'd want to increase the weight of the car beyond moving the battery, etc. Maybe if you've had your eye on that 150 lb stereo setup for the hatch.

Are the systems with the same spring rated F/R intended for street cars? It might be that they are meant for race cars with different setups than the stock car.

You can get some really beefy front sway bars. Couple that with no rear bar or a light rear bar (stock 94 or just your current stock bar) and it might be enough to balance the car. Wider rear tires may also help get the car into balance with these setups.

Again, this is just my speculation and is not based on any actual experience with the coil-overs in question. I did run a 550/450 spring setup for a while and found the rear end loose using the stock sway bars. The spring rates actually seem "right" (simialr wheel rates F/R for 50/50 car) but I think you need a stiff sway bar in front to make it easy to drive.

-Max
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2002 | 12:09 PM
  #11  
Mazderati's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 554
Likes: 17
From: KDJFKL
The Tein RE is said to be for track use.

-Kyle
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2002 | 01:39 PM
  #12  
ARD T2's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 17
From: Silicon Valley, CA.
The JIC's can be rebuilt in house at Ziel Motorsports. You can actually select the valving and spring rates you desire. IF you want a drag setup, roadrace, street/track. All of these can be done. An infinite number of options there.

The JIC FLTA2's in JDM spec also have symmetrical spring rates front and rear. They were around 14kg.

Laters, Rishie
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2002 | 04:11 PM
  #13  
Aristo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 654
Likes: 9
From: Sherman Oaks CA
Does anybody here have the HKS Hiperdamper IIs or the Tein REs, and if so could you please tell us your impressions of the way they make the car handle?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2002 | 05:56 PM
  #14  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
the r series tein's will be too stiff for the street. stick w/ the h's. i'd go w/ the he's, if you got a few extra bucks, over the ha's
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2002 | 09:20 PM
  #15  
ARD T2's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 17
From: Silicon Valley, CA.
STIFF, HKS, APEXi N1, Tein RE. STIFFFFFFF.

JIC FLT-A2, very comfortable for monotube coilover. It's quite simple.

rishie
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2002 | 09:43 PM
  #16  
1FooknTiteFD's Avatar
Ghost Ride the Whip
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
one of my friends have the Tein RE and another one has the HKS hiper damper. The Tein RE is very very stiff, but the HKS is perfectly streetable and handles very well. The shocks are 38 way stiffness adjustable (from the top of the shock tower) so you can virtually make them as soft as a stock rx7



Does anybody here have the HKS Hiperdamper IIs or the Tein REs, and if so could you please tell us your impressions of the way they make the car handle?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 12:06 AM
  #17  
suganuma's Avatar
no
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX / Tokyo, Japan currently
I have option one....

GAB Super R
500 and 400 Ground control

car is without engine though so i havent gotten to drive it like this yet...
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2002 | 04:11 AM
  #18  
don't be a rishie's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Just get JIC man... I keep telling you guys.
ever consider JIC? they can make your car handle like a F1 car!!
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2002 | 12:13 PM
  #19  
infinit1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 241
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
Have never relly heard anyhting good about JIC but I have the Tein HA's and they are fine for street use and track. Actually most people think that they are too stiff for the street with the 10K/8K springs in them.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2002 | 03:19 PM
  #20  
voodooracing's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: CA
The Type HA performs very well on the track. There ride comfort seems to be acceptable.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 03:13 PM
  #21  
djmessiah's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Milan, michigan
the best thing about JIC is the fact that you can lower your car with out decreasing the travel. The quality of these shocks are among the best.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
Sep 28, 2015 04:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.