Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

FD New Brake Options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #826  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,773
Likes: 799
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by howard coleman
On to the front…

Install caliper mounting bracket. I recommend you grab a Nicholson 12 inch Bastard file and spend no more that 5 minutes tops filing the outboard side of the upright casting as it might/could contact the inside edge of the rotor. You do not have to file much…. Just on a RADIUS from the center of the rotor out thru the raised area. Maybe a tenth of an inch. Not the whole area, just the area on a radius. You can eyeball this by putting the rotor on and looking. Both the top and bottom caliper mounting bolt areas need attention. 5 minutes tops. I did this and have NO contact whatsoever.

The plus here is that RB maximized the rotor size PERFECTLY. All you have to do is a tiny bit of filing and you get to run a 1.26 inch thick manly rotor.

Bolt on the caliper mounting bracket. 65 pounds torque.

mount rotor. mount caliper. Torque caliper to caliper mounting bracket bolts to 30 pounds. You will need a 10mm hex socket. Or a 3/8 will do… Holding rotor to hub, slide in pads. Place chrome spring retainer against pads. Place thru bolt tube in channel. Install thru bolt (you will need to push thru bolt tube towards wheel center a bit to line it up w hole. You need a 6 MM hex drive… Apply modest torque (any help here appreciated).

The front brake line install is exactly the same as rear…. Don’t forget to index.

Brake bleeding…

Unless you are contemplating running under the lap record at your favorite track I recommend any DOT 4 brake fluid. Buy a couple of quarts. You want to get all of the old fluid out.
Referring to your installation post, there appear to be some differences between what you have and what we where shipped.

I did not receive a "caliper mounting bracket" for the front kit. Nor do I see a way for a caliper mounting bracket to fit.

As far as "might/could contact the inside of the rotor", in my case it is more like - will contact the inside of the rotor so that the wheel is completely locked up and doesn't rotate.

The driver's side wheel scrapes through the entire rotation of the rotor but at least it rotates. The passenger side almost seems like its warped as it contacts heavily at certain points and will not rotate by hand at all once the wheel is bolted on. So at that point, its either a fitment issue or a quality problem where they aren't checking their parts before they ship them out.

I'm not sure I feel comfortable enough to run the rotors as is on track at speed. The FD already has pad knockback issues from the wheel bearings kicking back the pads as the bearings move around. What testing has been done to determine if the rotor will contact the steering knuckle for the same reason? It seems like more of a risk with the RB kit than with other kits given those tight tolerances at the steering knuckle.

Beautiful kit but these issues are disconcerting.


Last comment. Both FDs that I've owned had the brake line mounting tabs facing forward. Both 93.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #827  
habu2's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Dallas TX
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
Last comment. Both FDs that I've owned had the brake line mounting tabs facing forward. Both 93.
I think a quick poll is in order here. Could everyone please post the following info?

Year model car
Shock type/brand
Brakeline mounting tab - front or rear

I'll look at mine tonight and post back.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 01:57 PM
  #828  
hyperion's Avatar
Re-engineering everything
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 753
Likes: 5
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
I'm not sure I feel comfortable enough to run the rotors as is on track at speed. The FD already has pad knockback issues from the wheel bearings kicking back the pads as the bearings move around. What testing has been done to determine if the rotor will contact the steering knuckle for the same reason? It seems like more of a risk with the RB kit than with other kits given those tight tolerances at the steering knuckle.
This, above everything else, is my main and very serious concern. Since it's a well-known issue that the front rotors tend to move around when the car is on sticky race tires, small clearances to the uprights are a major issue.

This is something that I personally mentioned to both Howard and Warren at RB. I just want to be clear that I'm still very excited about the kit, but I do not want to be the guy that tests whether or not the rotors will bind against the upright due to flex in the bearings/upright under hard cornering.

I am going to wait on installation until I've seen some testing that makes me feel better about this point. Again, I'm happy that there is a new brake kit for the FD, but I need to be sure that known issues with the FD have been carefully addressed.

And FWIW, my tabs face forward.

-ch
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #829  
afgmoto1978's Avatar
Lift Off in T-Minus...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 4
From: Kingman, AZ
I had to sand 1.5 mm + 0.1mm off my rear pads in order for them to fit without shims. Anybody else have this issue?

My tabs are facing forward, but since I have Tein Coilovers too, I will rotate the shocks.


With the front rotor to caliper mounting ears, I have 2-3mm of clearance, but I wonder how much flex is seen in the system under extreme load?
Attached Thumbnails FD  New Brake Options-dsc06179.jpg   FD  New Brake Options-dsc06187.jpg   FD  New Brake Options-dsc06191.jpg   FD  New Brake Options-dsc06197.jpg   FD  New Brake Options-dsc06341.jpg  

Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 02:34 PM
  #830  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,282
Likes: 703
From: Arlington, VA
afgmoro1978... how many of the attached pics are front, and how many rear? Shouldn't the rear operate in the same plane as the stocks did? Why would there be clearance issues in the rear (or was that JUST with the pads)?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #831  
afgmoto1978's Avatar
Lift Off in T-Minus...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 4
From: Kingman, AZ
The closeups are all of the front mounting ears; I did not see this issue on the rears. The only issue I've experienced in the rear are the pads being too thick. everything else is good.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 05:39 PM
  #832  
Callsign_Vega's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Fort Rucker, Alabama
Anyone that still have stock rotors try putting them back on and seeing how tight of a clearance it is compared to the RB setup?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #833  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,773
Likes: 799
From: Bay Area CA
i do.

this is with the 99 rotors
Attached Thumbnails FD  New Brake Options-cimg0073.jpg   FD  New Brake Options-cimg0074.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #834  
azn akira's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Seoul, Korea
Originally Posted by habu2
I think a quick poll is in order here. Could everyone please post the following info?

Year model car
Shock type/brand
Brakeline mounting tab - front or rear

I'll look at mine tonight and post back.
1994
kei office type xr
brakeline mounting tab - front
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #835  
habu2's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Dallas TX
1993
Original Mazda shock (changing soon to coilovers)
brakeline mounting tab - front
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 09:54 PM
  #836  
Callsign_Vega's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Fort Rucker, Alabama
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
i do.

this is with the 99 rotors
From what I can see, those rotors might have a little more room between the steering knuckle then some of the RB rotors, but not much more. Anyone else agree?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #837  
1st to 3rd's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Out playing pseudo racer
Originally Posted by howard coleman
the other problem related to rotor clearance i believe. i did post an install tip piece and mentioned that you do need to file a minimal amount off the upper and lower knuckle so as to accomodate the large rotor. a real easy job that can be done in 5 minutes of filing.
Using a feeler gauge, I measured .008"(.2mm) clearance between the upper caliper mount & rotor and .035"(.9mm) on the lower. Clearance with a well used stock rotor is around .15"(3.8mm) measured from the lower mount. I did not try the passenger side.
How much clearance is required? I've seen 2-3mm recommended as the minimum caliper to wheel clearance. Wouldn't this be similar? If so, I have more than 5mins with a file... and would need significant convincing that removing that much material is an appropriate fix.

My Tein HA's have the brake line mounting tab on the front. Likewise for the stock '93 R1 shock.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 11:54 PM
  #838  
Eggie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: 15143
My Konis have the line tabs on front.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 12:26 AM
  #839  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,943
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Originally Posted by afgmoto1978
Actually that 3mm difference is without the shims. Was not planning on using them. And the sanding portion is an easy one when you have full access to a machine shop.
Hawk HP+ pads have always fit my rear calipers perfectly with the stock rotors, and the new RB ET500 pads also fit perfectly with my new RB rear rotors.

You have a problem with your rear calipers, or maybe you are not screwing in the piston all the way in!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 12:45 AM
  #840  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,943
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
March 92 R1
stock and Tokico Illumina shocks
tabs always in front

I replaced my front EBC REDS with the ET500s which is all that RB makes for the front stock calipers. See my previous tests.
The ET500s are better than the REDS for multiple 60-0 stops as they stopped by over .1 seconds faster.
The brake feel was also better.

Last edited by cewrx7r1; Jul 31, 2007 at 12:52 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 10:58 AM
  #841  
afgmoto1978's Avatar
Lift Off in T-Minus...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 4
From: Kingman, AZ
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
Hawk HP+ pads have always fit my rear calipers perfectly with the stock rotors, and the new RB ET500 pads also fit perfectly with my new RB rear rotors.

You have a problem with your rear calipers, or maybe you are not screwing in the piston all the way in!
I will check the dimension's of mine and compare to a friend's FD. I made sure the piston was backed out all the way.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 11:38 AM
  #842  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
there's been discussion about the filing necessary to clear the RB rotors... i thought this might be of some help.

i pulled my caliper and rotor to give you a better idea of what has to be done. please note that you are not compromising strength here as it is just a bit of the bolt boss. notice you do not have to file the whole of the ring around the bolt, only the edge nearest the rotor.

top



bottom



i have logged 700 miles on my RB system and have had no rotor/upright interference whatsoever. clearance is around 1 mm. i could have filed additional but it appears unnecessary. perhaps.... perhaps at the track i will find some contact but if i do i will just grab my file and spend another 5 minutes on it.

bottom line.... no safety issues. little work to get it done. 1.26 inch rotor.

i am still not sure as to the brakeline length. my car is a 93 VIN 669 so it is an early model. i have another set of front shocks that are the same as mine w the tab rearward. but it appears most have the tab forward which requires a longer line.

here's a 93 (early) not mine... front right shock. note R denoting right



here's a closeup of the tab



here's my right front.... note R on tab



hc
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #843  
Herblenny's Avatar
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 6
From: Alabama
Thanks Howard.. Now I see what needed to be filed off.. Not too bad @ all!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 12:48 PM
  #844  
M104-AMG's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 6
From: FL
FWIW, I just confirmed that the caliper & rotor combo is just too large to fit inside a 16-inch wheel.

I will be sending my red anodized front BBK back to Racing Beat, unless someone wants mine.

:-( neil
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #845  
hyperion's Avatar
Re-engineering everything
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 753
Likes: 5
From: Bay Area, CA
Howard, I believe the hex side of the tab faces outward. I think that 'R' shock is installed backwards on the car. Another way to think of it is that the retaining clip goes on the chassis-facing side of the tab.

-ch
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 01:17 PM
  #846  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,773
Likes: 799
From: Bay Area CA
looking at the 2 piece caliper setup howard received (well caliper and mounting bracket anyway), it would be nice if the same one piece caliper setup that the rest of us received in our kits would be [track] tested. otherwise i'm not sure that the testing would be completely valid.

from a QA standpoint, you always want to test with the same product that goes out to the public for various reasons - including legal liability.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #847  
Trout2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 15
From: New Orleans
FWIW, I've got the Stoptech BBK and the brake lines are not long enough to go around the front of the shock where my 94 OEM shocks and Tokico shocks had the mounting tab. I've been running Advance Design shocks for 6 years or so now with no tab and have never had a problem with the line rubbing.

With the Stoptech's brake lines, they are coated and I zip tied some rubber hose around them in case they would contact the shock. I check this every time I get under the car since last October and there are no signs of rubbing.

Jack
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #848  
aoc007's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area, CA
'93 R1 manufactured February '92, Koni Yellows have the tab on the front and I also believe my stock struts did.


>>>Will there be a recall on this or should I have my BBK installed as-is because I just recieved it yesterday?

Thanks
-Andy
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #849  
sdoow's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: nj
RB front big brake kit fitment issues

We apologize for the fitment issues and all of the pre-order customers will be getting an email from us with the solutions.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 02:49 PM
  #850  
sdoow's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: nj
Originally Posted by M104-AMG
FWIW, I just confirmed that the caliper & rotor combo is just too large to fit inside a 16-inch wheel.

:-( neil
Just to make it clear that our BBK (front and rear) requires 17" or larger wheel. They will not fit 16" wheel.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.