Custom FD front Camber/Caster Bushings
#1
Custom FD front Camber/Caster Bushings
In the quest for more front camber, I needed to do something custom. I asked around and everyone uses some $777.46 upper arms imported from Japan. They use heim joints and as such you can adjust the length of the arm. Only problem with that solution is that they're insanely expensive and hard to get. So, I designed an entire upper arm, made engineering drawings to have parts made, but never pulled the trigger. I just let the idea simmer for a while. There are only two ways to gain more camber, shorten the upper arm, or lengthen the lower arm. There are pros and cons with each method, which I won't really get into.
I had a few options.
1. Make custom front upper arms.
2. Make custom front lower arms. Since the shock and sway bar mount to this, it would be very difficult, and certainly not the easiest option.
3. Modify the lower cam bolt slots. I could remove the cam bolt retainer "U" and move it outboard a little bit, and slot the mounting holes more. Seems easy enough.
4. Make eccentric lower bushings. (not an eccentric pin, I don't like those)
5. Make eccentric upper bushings. (not an eccentric pin, I don't like those)
I ended up going with option 5 for a variety of reasons, but here are the main considerations. In most race classes, you are allowed to modify any suspension components, but not the mounting points. If I modified the sub-frame cam bolt area, that would constitute modifying the mounting points. The reason I don't like eccentric center pins is because they can be a pain during alignments, and they can move during hard cornering with sticky tires. By offsetting the busing, this can't happen.
So, with these bushings the hole for the pin is offset by 0.125". This will effectively shorten the control arm by that amount. You will still have the same adjust-ability as stock, the range will just be offset by ~0.7 degrees more negative. I also took the opportunity to offset the upper control arm rearward by 0.125" as well. This will offset the stock caster range by ~0.7 degrees as well.
Here is the first prototype run. These are made of black Delrin. I will be test fitting in the next week or so, and aligning soon after. Once I get these on my car and aligned, I will remove my coilover spring and check for clearance between the shock/control arm. These are made to press into the control arm, and when you do you'll have to be mindful to install them in the correction orientation. The center hole should be closer to the ball joint end of the control arm. The thick flanged bushings will go in the front locations, and the thin flanged bushings will go in the rear locations. I also plan on drilling a small hole through the control arm and into the Delrin. Then I'll install a small screw (something like M4 or smaller), just enough to ensure that the bushing can't re-clock itself. I think the friction from the press fit should be enough, but I may do this anyhow. These also include a lubrication groove, for use with a grease zerk fitting installation (which I already have done to mine, since I used Delrin bushings previously).
If all goes well, I'm going to have a run of these made up and offer them up as an alternative to the expensive upper arms.
Now for some pics:
I had a few options.
1. Make custom front upper arms.
2. Make custom front lower arms. Since the shock and sway bar mount to this, it would be very difficult, and certainly not the easiest option.
3. Modify the lower cam bolt slots. I could remove the cam bolt retainer "U" and move it outboard a little bit, and slot the mounting holes more. Seems easy enough.
4. Make eccentric lower bushings. (not an eccentric pin, I don't like those)
5. Make eccentric upper bushings. (not an eccentric pin, I don't like those)
I ended up going with option 5 for a variety of reasons, but here are the main considerations. In most race classes, you are allowed to modify any suspension components, but not the mounting points. If I modified the sub-frame cam bolt area, that would constitute modifying the mounting points. The reason I don't like eccentric center pins is because they can be a pain during alignments, and they can move during hard cornering with sticky tires. By offsetting the busing, this can't happen.
So, with these bushings the hole for the pin is offset by 0.125". This will effectively shorten the control arm by that amount. You will still have the same adjust-ability as stock, the range will just be offset by ~0.7 degrees more negative. I also took the opportunity to offset the upper control arm rearward by 0.125" as well. This will offset the stock caster range by ~0.7 degrees as well.
Here is the first prototype run. These are made of black Delrin. I will be test fitting in the next week or so, and aligning soon after. Once I get these on my car and aligned, I will remove my coilover spring and check for clearance between the shock/control arm. These are made to press into the control arm, and when you do you'll have to be mindful to install them in the correction orientation. The center hole should be closer to the ball joint end of the control arm. The thick flanged bushings will go in the front locations, and the thin flanged bushings will go in the rear locations. I also plan on drilling a small hole through the control arm and into the Delrin. Then I'll install a small screw (something like M4 or smaller), just enough to ensure that the bushing can't re-clock itself. I think the friction from the press fit should be enough, but I may do this anyhow. These also include a lubrication groove, for use with a grease zerk fitting installation (which I already have done to mine, since I used Delrin bushings previously).
If all goes well, I'm going to have a run of these made up and offer them up as an alternative to the expensive upper arms.
Now for some pics:
Trending Topics
#8
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (10)
We are having a set of custom lower front A-arms made in the next few weeks as Mazda is essentially running out of front replacements. The tie rod/ball joint is not replaceable on the factory arms.... Most above 100K miles are pretty worn out.
This is an interesting option for the uppers.
What is your current front neg camber? What are you looking to run with these?
Bill at LPI Racing seems to be fine with the current allowed camber running stock A-arms. He will be testing the new custom lowers we are developing.
I'm no mechanical engineer so just wondering why you need more camber.
Are your tires temps not even?
This is an interesting option for the uppers.
What is your current front neg camber? What are you looking to run with these?
Bill at LPI Racing seems to be fine with the current allowed camber running stock A-arms. He will be testing the new custom lowers we are developing.
I'm no mechanical engineer so just wondering why you need more camber.
Are your tires temps not even?
#9
We are having a set of custom lower front A-arms made in the next few weeks as Mazda is essentially running out of front replacements. The tie rod/ball joint is not replaceable on the factory arms.... Most above 100K miles are pretty worn out.
This is an interesting option for the uppers.
What is your current front neg camber? What are you looking to run with these?
Bill at LPI Racing seems to be fine with the current allowed camber running stock A-arms. He will be testing the new custom lowers we are developing.
I'm no mechanical engineer so just wondering why you need more camber.
Are your tires temps not even?
This is an interesting option for the uppers.
What is your current front neg camber? What are you looking to run with these?
Bill at LPI Racing seems to be fine with the current allowed camber running stock A-arms. He will be testing the new custom lowers we are developing.
I'm no mechanical engineer so just wondering why you need more camber.
Are your tires temps not even?
More camber for even wear and more grip.
#10
Version 1 of my offset/offset front UCA bushings installed. Version two in the works this week, I had to make some minor changes before these bad boys are ready for production.
Small M5 bolt holding it from reclocking, or moving.
The tweaks for version 2 include:
- 0.002" larger center bore. The center bore shrunk too much when pressed in.
- 2 degree tapers on each end to limit bushing friction on the body mounts.
- 0.030" more thickness on the flanges, while keeping the same overall part height.
- Alignment mark for ease of installation.
- 1/32" - 1/16" more camber offset. Not sure yet, need to take more measurements today.
FYI - I aligned my car yesterday and was able to get a max of -3.1 degrees of camber at a ride height of 25" (with 285/30/18 A6). I'd like to have more adjustably range for suspension test/tune purposes, so I'll likely go with a setup that has a max of 3.4 degrees or so.
Small M5 bolt holding it from reclocking, or moving.
The tweaks for version 2 include:
- 0.002" larger center bore. The center bore shrunk too much when pressed in.
- 2 degree tapers on each end to limit bushing friction on the body mounts.
- 0.030" more thickness on the flanges, while keeping the same overall part height.
- Alignment mark for ease of installation.
- 1/32" - 1/16" more camber offset. Not sure yet, need to take more measurements today.
FYI - I aligned my car yesterday and was able to get a max of -3.1 degrees of camber at a ride height of 25" (with 285/30/18 A6). I'd like to have more adjustably range for suspension test/tune purposes, so I'll likely go with a setup that has a max of 3.4 degrees or so.
#12
I'm the Juggernaut BITCH!
iTrader: (7)
yes they have them for both the front and the rear. As yzf said you can get them in the alignment kit or individually. These are the part numbers for the eccentric bushings.
Front of car
SPF2821Kx1 – Front Upper control arm (4)
SPF2822Kx1 – Lower control arm Front (2)
SPF2823Kx1 – Lower control arm Rear (2)
Rear of car
SPF2679Kx1 – Upper control arm (4)
Link to their catalog.
http://203.31.191.243/fulcrumCat/
Front of car
SPF2821Kx1 – Front Upper control arm (4)
SPF2822Kx1 – Lower control arm Front (2)
SPF2823Kx1 – Lower control arm Rear (2)
Rear of car
SPF2679Kx1 – Upper control arm (4)
Link to their catalog.
http://203.31.191.243/fulcrumCat/
#14
Here is version 2 installed. They now features 3/16" offset. I was able to get -3.25 degrees of camber at a ride height of 25" with these. Not sure on caster yet, I'll post up when I get more info on that. My home/track alignment setup can't measure caster (yet).
#16
I suppose it could. Plus they're a pain in the *** when aligning the car, and if you remove the arm and put it back on, its alignment time. For me, I can remove and install the upper arm and retain the same alignment time after time. Plus its one less thing to worry about.
#17
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sherman, CT
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is exactly the sort of thread I have been searching for, and my question pertains greatly to the topic at hand.
I have been planning to run as close to 9 degrees of caster as I can in combination with a minimum of -3 degrees of camber. (Any caster number sub 8.25 would be unacceptable). I know the ideal numbers are around 6/7, but the higher figures better suit my needs.
I've found a Super Now - Super Caster pillow ball bearing set (Can't post links yet, but they're on rhdjapan.com). However, even with a good alignment, I am almost positive that they aren't going to do much by themselves.
How should I go about achieving this degree of caster? I am open to all options, the more the better. I would like to stay under $1,500 if possible, but I am really open to anything.
I have been planning to run as close to 9 degrees of caster as I can in combination with a minimum of -3 degrees of camber. (Any caster number sub 8.25 would be unacceptable). I know the ideal numbers are around 6/7, but the higher figures better suit my needs.
I've found a Super Now - Super Caster pillow ball bearing set (Can't post links yet, but they're on rhdjapan.com). However, even with a good alignment, I am almost positive that they aren't going to do much by themselves.
How should I go about achieving this degree of caster? I am open to all options, the more the better. I would like to stay under $1,500 if possible, but I am really open to anything.
#19
This is exactly the sort of thread I have been searching for, and my question pertains greatly to the topic at hand.
I have been planning to run as close to 9 degrees of caster as I can in combination with a minimum of -3 degrees of camber. (Any caster number sub 8.25 would be unacceptable). I know the ideal numbers are around 6/7, but the higher figures better suit my needs.
I've found a Super Now - Super Caster pillow ball bearing set (Can't post links yet, but they're on rhdjapan.com). However, even with a good alignment, I am almost positive that they aren't going to do much by themselves.
How should I go about achieving this degree of caster? I am open to all options, the more the better. I would like to stay under $1,500 if possible, but I am really open to anything.
I have been planning to run as close to 9 degrees of caster as I can in combination with a minimum of -3 degrees of camber. (Any caster number sub 8.25 would be unacceptable). I know the ideal numbers are around 6/7, but the higher figures better suit my needs.
I've found a Super Now - Super Caster pillow ball bearing set (Can't post links yet, but they're on rhdjapan.com). However, even with a good alignment, I am almost positive that they aren't going to do much by themselves.
How should I go about achieving this degree of caster? I am open to all options, the more the better. I would like to stay under $1,500 if possible, but I am really open to anything.
I dunno, post a thread about it. These bushings will not get you 9 degrees, or even close to it.
Not really. I'll post up my technical drawings for all to copy if anyone wants. I decided I'm not interested in dealing with potential liability of suspension parts. For what its worth, it takes about $15 in delrin, and $60 in machine shop time to make a set of these.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What are your needs that you require so much caster? Are you trying to make your car steer itself on long straight interstates?
#22
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sherman, CT
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anymore advice on how I would get to around 9 degrees of caster? I'm afraid that if I start a new thread it won't be taken seriously because my objective is so abnormal.
#23
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: charlotte, NC
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sliding. I used to have a miata with minimal caster and it was great fun to drive, but when you went to flick it sideways you'd be walking the wheel to countersteer, which isn't very fun or ideal. You want to be able to initiate the slide and have the wheel spin through your hands (Like my old E30). Caster is how you get this, and the more the better (to a certain degree, I mean you gotta be able to steer the thing!).
Anymore advice on how I would get to around 9 degrees of caster? I'm afraid that if I start a new thread it won't be taken seriously because my objective is so abnormal.
Anymore advice on how I would get to around 9 degrees of caster? I'm afraid that if I start a new thread it won't be taken seriously because my objective is so abnormal.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Jose
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have some bushings like these for the lower control arms and they worked fine for years. As mentioned I had upper a-arms fabbed since I wanted them adjustable. One thing to bear in mind when doing the uppers is wheel clearance. The Japanese arms shown would likely have issues with large backspace wheels on the rear side of the arm.
-Andy M.
-Andy M.