Another Wheel question (FD3S)...
07-11-13, 11:42 PM
#1
Another Wheel question (FD3S)...
I PM'ed Rishie last week asing the same question no response yet... I also read all the wheel post but everybodys perception on it fits is different. I'm looking for a new set and Volk finally makes a few more offsets with concave that will work.
I want dual purpose setup functional with no compromise of driveability. This must work for track as well Ohlins 11k, AP BBK and 470whp.
Agressive setup more concave rear only We know this will work less concave on rear
18x10 +30 and 18x9.5+40 18x10 +40 and 18x9 +40
Now I don't mind rolling the fenders but no pulling.
Current mods:
Aftermarket arms
slight roll
Coilovers
25" ride height
1.5" camber all the way around
235/275 Hankook RS-3's tapers in
I appreciate any help on this matter as you only get 1 chance to get it right with ordering
.
From: Flyweight great info but I'm confused on the 18x10 +35 and 18x9.5 +44 setup is this rolled or not?
A conservative fitment is one that is in-between the offset ranges. A 9.5 +29 will work in the rear insofar as it will stick just as far out towards the fender as an 11 in +48 wheel. That said, there is no reason to run a 9.5 +29 wheel as you can easily find a better offset that does not have all the problems of fender rolling associated with it. I have included what I believe to be the ideal offset for the listed wheel width. The ideal will not require a fender roll to fit the wheel provided you have a 25 in overall diameter tire in the front and have stiffer than stock suspension. The exceptions to this rule are the 10.5 and 11 in wide rear wheel which will both require a fender roll.
FRONT
Wheel Width Offset range Ideal
10 +50 to +52 +52
9.5 +44 to +56 +48
9 +37 to +63 +45
REAR Offset range Ideal
11 +48 +48 (will require fender roll)
10.5 +42 to +54 +48 (will require fender roll depending on tire size)
10 +35 to +61 +44
9.5 +29 to more than+60 +40
I want dual purpose setup functional with no compromise of driveability. This must work for track as well Ohlins 11k, AP BBK and 470whp.
Agressive setup more concave rear only We know this will work less concave on rear
18x10 +30 and 18x9.5+40 18x10 +40 and 18x9 +40
Now I don't mind rolling the fenders but no pulling.
Current mods:
Aftermarket arms
slight roll
Coilovers
25" ride height
1.5" camber all the way around
235/275 Hankook RS-3's tapers in
I appreciate any help on this matter as you only get 1 chance to get it right with ordering
.
From: Flyweight great info but I'm confused on the 18x10 +35 and 18x9.5 +44 setup is this rolled or not?
A conservative fitment is one that is in-between the offset ranges. A 9.5 +29 will work in the rear insofar as it will stick just as far out towards the fender as an 11 in +48 wheel. That said, there is no reason to run a 9.5 +29 wheel as you can easily find a better offset that does not have all the problems of fender rolling associated with it. I have included what I believe to be the ideal offset for the listed wheel width. The ideal will not require a fender roll to fit the wheel provided you have a 25 in overall diameter tire in the front and have stiffer than stock suspension. The exceptions to this rule are the 10.5 and 11 in wide rear wheel which will both require a fender roll.
FRONT
Wheel Width Offset range Ideal
10 +50 to +52 +52
9.5 +44 to +56 +48
9 +37 to +63 +45
REAR Offset range Ideal
11 +48 +48 (will require fender roll)
10.5 +42 to +54 +48 (will require fender roll depending on tire size)
10 +35 to +61 +44
9.5 +29 to more than+60 +40
07-12-13, 01:08 AM
#7
If you want TE37's, I would personally run 18x9.5 +22 rear and 18x9.5 +35 fronts. Throw on 255/35/18 *proper* performance tires (RS-3, StarSpecs, etc.) or even R-comps. Roll your fenders flat all the way around, and you will be good.
The front +35 wheels will have less concavity. I would space them an extra 5mm, as well.
With your ride height and camber settings, I highly doubt you'll encounter any rubbing issues if your fenders are rolled flat. An ideal setup would require fender rolling as a prerequisite, otherwise you will be stuck with weak sizing. I guess this part is all subjective, though.
FYI, RavSpec is having somewhat of a clearance on a few TE37 models and colors.
The front +35 wheels will have less concavity. I would space them an extra 5mm, as well.
With your ride height and camber settings, I highly doubt you'll encounter any rubbing issues if your fenders are rolled flat. An ideal setup would require fender rolling as a prerequisite, otherwise you will be stuck with weak sizing. I guess this part is all subjective, though.
FYI, RavSpec is having somewhat of a clearance on a few TE37 models and colors.
Last edited by Farkel; 07-12-13 at 01:17 AM.
Trending Topics
07-12-13, 04:48 PM
#9
Why are you considering anything other than the 18x10 +40 front and rear?
That would net you the most conservative fitment (closer stock +50 offset = less fender rolling), the least scrub radius (closest to stock offset) and the most width of the choices you presented.
That would net you the most conservative fitment (closer stock +50 offset = less fender rolling), the least scrub radius (closest to stock offset) and the most width of the choices you presented.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
diabolical1
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
30
01-30-16 05:50 AM
