Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

255/50/16 BFG Drag Radials on rear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 07:03 AM
  #1  
93 R1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
From: maryland
255/50/16 BFG Drag Radials on rear?

Will these fit on the rear without rubbing or do I need to get the smaller Nitto's?

Anyone have firsthand knowledge?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 07:06 AM
  #2  
ttpowerd's Avatar
HARRRRRRRRR
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Marietta GA
No first hand knowledge but I don't think they will even fit on the stock wheels (if that's what you are putting them on). Otherwise offset and wheel size will determine whether or not they will fit.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 10:02 AM
  #3  
93 R1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
From: maryland
I know that they will fit on the stock wheels.

Anyone running these?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 10:42 AM
  #4  
streetdreamzny's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: P.C., NY
i have 245/50/16 nitto drag radials on the back , they fit fine with no rubbing.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 06:35 PM
  #5  
sub-zero's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I am also not sure about the stock 16`s but I am running the 275/40/17`s and they are great sticky tires but dont expect very many miles out of them.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 07:14 PM
  #6  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,800
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Thumbs up

I've run those exact tires at the track on stock suspension. No issues at all, although the rear of the car did sit quite a bit higher.

Slap those puppies on there
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 07:20 PM
  #7  
cmartinp28's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: union, nj
thats always good to know..... i thought 245 was the limit on stock rims
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 09:01 PM
  #8  
rx7will's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco, CA
They mount to the tires and fit on the car without rubbing. I'm running the same combo.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 09:16 PM
  #9  
cmartinp28's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: union, nj
can this fit in the front also?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2002 | 12:02 AM
  #10  
ek9220ps's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: long beach, ca
i have 255/50/16 in the rear. if you want the drag racing look. go for it. i think it looks great! it looks alittle funny if you car is not lower. I notice the handing is off. but its a good drag setup. i got three 6500 rpm launch until the clutch started to feel funny.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2014 | 06:16 PM
  #11  
2slo4my7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
From: Ottawa
Sorry to bring back an old thread.

Would 255/50/16 fit in the front without rubbing fender liner using stock wheels?

Should be 26.1" in diameter instead of 24.9" so I am aware of the difference it will make the on the speedo.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2014 | 09:00 PM
  #12  
ZDan's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 682
Likes: 4
From: Pawtucket, RI
Originally Posted by 2slo4my7
Sorry to bring back an old thread.

Would 255/50/16 fit in the front without rubbing fender liner using stock wheels?

Should be 26.1" in diameter instead of 24.9" so I am aware of the difference it will make the on the speedo.
Why? What are your wants/needs? Usage envelope (wet, dry, cold, snow, ice, dry track, wet track, autoX, etc)? Why do you *think* you want to run 255/50-16s up front?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2014 | 09:56 PM
  #13  
2slo4my7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
From: Ottawa
Originally Posted by ZDan
Why? What are your wants/needs? Usage envelope (wet, dry, cold, snow, ice, dry track, wet track, autoX, etc)? Why do you *think* you want to run 255/50-16s up front?
Because 255/45-16 doesn't exist
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2014 | 07:19 AM
  #14  
ZDan's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 682
Likes: 4
From: Pawtucket, RI
255/50-16 is a crap size for the front for a few reasons:
Slightly pooched on an 8" wheel => bad for steering responsiveness and feel
Very tall sidewall => bad for steering responsiveness and feel
Big tire = heavy tire => bad for steering responsiveness and feel
Taller tire => increased brake pedal effort and travel required
Taller tire => higher c.g.

There's very little selection for street tires wider than 225 for 16" wheels. If you must have 255s, better off getting 17" wheels. But depending on your wants/needs/usage, there *might* be a 245/45-16 that will work for you, which would be an infinitely better size choice for the front of an FD than 255/50-16. IMHO!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2014 | 05:32 PM
  #15  
2slo4my7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
From: Ottawa
Thanks for your opinion but I didn't ask for it. If you can't answer the question please refrain from posting your $0.02!

Originally Posted by ZDan
255/50-16 is a crap size for the front for a few reasons:
Slightly pooched on an 8" wheel => bad for steering responsiveness and feel
Very tall sidewall => bad for steering responsiveness and feel
Big tire = heavy tire => bad for steering responsiveness and feel
Taller tire => increased brake pedal effort and travel required
Taller tire => higher c.g.

There's very little selection for street tires wider than 225 for 16" wheels. If you must have 255s, better off getting 17" wheels. But depending on your wants/needs/usage, there *might* be a 245/45-16 that will work for you, which would be an infinitely better size choice for the front of an FD than 255/50-16. IMHO!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2014 | 07:36 PM
  #16  
Natey's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 1,484
From: West Coast
Originally Posted by 2slo4my7
Sorry to bring back an old thread.

Would 255/50/16 fit in the front without rubbing fender liner using stock wheels?

Should be 26.1" in diameter instead of 24.9" so I am aware of the difference it will make the on the speedo.
That diameter is too large for the front of an FD unless you actually raise it up like a 4x4. It won't fit on a stock car without rubbing.
Rear yes, front no dice.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2014 | 08:38 PM
  #17  
2slo4my7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
From: Ottawa
Originally Posted by Natey
That diameter is too large for the front of an FD unless you actually raise it up like a 4x4. It won't fit on a stock car without rubbing.
Rear yes, front no dice.
thank you!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2014 | 08:40 PM
  #18  
ZDan's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 682
Likes: 4
From: Pawtucket, RI
Originally Posted by 2slo4my7
Thanks for your opinion but I didn't ask for it. If you can't answer the question please refrain from posting your $0.02!
pearls before swine...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Aug 18, 2015 05:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 PM.