17 fronts and 18 rears?
#2
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
nope...there was an old thread about this...
but if you are a autocrosser most feel that there is no gain....
but the looks seems good
I had it bookmarked for awhile....
here:
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ght=front+rear
but if you are a autocrosser most feel that there is no gain....
but the looks seems good
I had it bookmarked for awhile....
here:
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ght=front+rear
#3
Addicted to Rotary Turbo
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont really understand why you would want to put smaller rims on the front than the back though. In my opinion, 18's on the front and back would look better than 17's on the front and 18's on the back. It might look good at a glance, but if you took time and looked out it, it would probly look a little funny.
Trending Topics
#11
Lives on the Forum
17fr/18rr FD SSR IA2 Pics
Here are the pics 7racer was referring to, for the lazy dunces that didn't get 7racer's post the first time
Amazing! It's really tough to tell. I wonder what tire sizes were used? Maintaining sidewall height to rim diameter is key to having that visual effect of no real difference between 17/18. Although the rear doesn't look jacked up either?
Compare the 17/18 fr/rr to my car in my sig below with 17 x 9s all around with 255/40-17 street tires.
Perhaps the subtle wedge shape of FD gives off that effect of 17 fr/18 rr working well?
Amazing! It's really tough to tell. I wonder what tire sizes were used? Maintaining sidewall height to rim diameter is key to having that visual effect of no real difference between 17/18. Although the rear doesn't look jacked up either?
Compare the 17/18 fr/rr to my car in my sig below with 17 x 9s all around with 255/40-17 street tires.
Perhaps the subtle wedge shape of FD gives off that effect of 17 fr/18 rr working well?
Last edited by SleepR1; 01-10-04 at 11:49 AM.
#14
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I actually like the look of this if you plan on running larger rear tires. Too many times I see 17 inch wheels all around and the rear one always looks smaller when people run 234-245/40/17 in front and 275/40/17 in the rear. I might just do this.
If I can keep the sidewall heights similar without causing rubbing issues I will probabaly go this way.
If I can keep the sidewall heights similar without causing rubbing issues I will probabaly go this way.
#15
Lives on the Forum
Try 9 x 17 with 255/40-17 front; and 10 x 18 with 285/35-18 rear. Sidewall height nearly the same--~4 inches for the front and rear
Originally posted by arutha
I actually like the look of this if you plan on running larger rear tires. Too many times I see 17 inch wheels all around and the rear one always looks smaller when people run 234-245/40/17 in front and 275/40/17 in the rear. I might just do this.
If I can keep the sidewall heights similar without causing rubbing issues I will probabaly go this way.
I actually like the look of this if you plan on running larger rear tires. Too many times I see 17 inch wheels all around and the rear one always looks smaller when people run 234-245/40/17 in front and 275/40/17 in the rear. I might just do this.
If I can keep the sidewall heights similar without causing rubbing issues I will probabaly go this way.
#16
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SleepR1
Try 9 x 17 with 255/40-17 front; and 10 x 18 with 285/35-18 rear. Sidewall height nearly the same--~4 inches for the front and rear
Try 9 x 17 with 255/40-17 front; and 10 x 18 with 285/35-18 rear. Sidewall height nearly the same--~4 inches for the front and rear
#17
Lives on the Forum
that'll be fine...
Originally posted by arutha
Should 41 offset front and a 49 offset rear work with this setup? I am also running H&R springs and have not rolled the fenders.
Should 41 offset front and a 49 offset rear work with this setup? I am also running H&R springs and have not rolled the fenders.
Last edited by SleepR1; 01-11-04 at 05:24 PM.
#19
Lives on the Forum
That's the point of it. You need to maintain the tire sidewall height the same, or else the 17 fr/18 rr will look odd...
Originally posted by arutha
Should the 285/35/18 be ok height wise? Looks like they are 1 inch taller than stock.
Should the 285/35/18 be ok height wise? Looks like they are 1 inch taller than stock.
#20
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SleepR1
That's the point of it. You need to maintain the tire sidewall height the same, or else the 17 fr/18 rr will look odd...
That's the point of it. You need to maintain the tire sidewall height the same, or else the 17 fr/18 rr will look odd...
It looks like most that run 285/18s use 30 instead of 35 so I am just double checking.
#21
Originally posted by arutha
I meant will the 285/35/18 fit with a 10x18 +49 and H&R springs.
It looks like most that run 285/18s use 30 instead of 35 so I am just double checking.
I meant will the 285/35/18 fit with a 10x18 +49 and H&R springs.
It looks like most that run 285/18s use 30 instead of 35 so I am just double checking.
FWIW, I am doing the same thing except going 275/35 in the rear on 9.5x18s with +45 offset.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post