Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

T04E 60-1 fuel needs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 02:52 PM
  #1  
Barwick's Avatar
Thread Starter
SCCA Rookie
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
T04E 60-1 fuel needs

I'm getting conflicting reports on this.. one guy says the stock 550's are still plenty for almost 300 hp with upgraded pump, and another guy says that the 4 720cc injectors on the car now aren't enough to run this turbo that I'm running and this setup... I only want to run it at 10 lbs, and maybe 15 at the track, it's got an NPR front mount (crappy I know...) it's got the Walbro pump, and an SX fuel pressure regulator, and aftermarket external wastegate (turbonetics racegate I *think*).

I'm 99% sure I'm picking up a used Wolf3D from a guy in town who installs and tunes them. He says if I want to keep the 720's in the primaries, I should have at least 1100's in the secondaries. What's your thoughts?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 07:50 PM
  #2  
$150FC's Avatar
Currently Winning
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
according to rx7.com's fuel calculator, 4x550 at 100% duty cycle will net you 317bhp.

edit: NPR? I thought you were going with the perfect sized intercooler for a 13B?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 08:27 PM
  #3  
Barwick's Avatar
Thread Starter
SCCA Rookie
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally posted by $150FC
according to rx7.com's fuel calculator, 4x550 at 100% duty cycle will net you 317bhp.

edit: NPR? I thought you were going with the perfect sized intercooler for a 13B?
The NPR is why the topic even came up, I'm ditching that thing as soon as I possibly can.

So then why is everyone telling me that I'll need these HUGE injectors? I dunno.. see my other post coming up...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 10:32 PM
  #4  
frode's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Drammen, Norway
Originally posted by Barwick
The NPR is why the topic even came up, I'm ditching that thing as soon as I possibly can.

So then why is everyone telling me that I'll need these HUGE injectors? I dunno.. see my other post coming up...
Thats because everyone isnt running at 100% dutycycle. Most are keeping it around 80% to have a bit of fuel in backup.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 10:53 PM
  #5  
Barwick's Avatar
Thread Starter
SCCA Rookie
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
the 4 720's shouldn't need a 100% duty cycle either though..
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 11:32 PM
  #6  
$150FC's Avatar
Currently Winning
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
for my money, 1600s are so cheap and leave room for more power later on.

i mean, ****, you can get them for $50 each on ebay, new. why spend $120 each on 720s?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2004 | 12:36 AM
  #7  
Barwick's Avatar
Thread Starter
SCCA Rookie
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
I've already got the 720's... I suppose I could get 1600's, but what brand and type do you recommend (new) to pick up that'll fit into the rail without modification?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2004 | 12:40 AM
  #8  
Barwick's Avatar
Thread Starter
SCCA Rookie
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
oh yeah, I'm 99% sure I'm picking up a used (old style) Wolf3D and having a local guy who's set them up on many rotaries, tune it.

Now, how hard would it be to run 2 more injectors (for a total of 6)? Wouldn't that give better fuel atomization and better control too?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2004 | 10:08 AM
  #9  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
720/1600 will be just fine. Why mess with extra injectors.

Plus, the staging method of the Wolf EMS allows you to run a larger injector size spread, since it stages the secondaries as a percentage of the primaries (I'm running 84%), so you always get that smooth transition.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2004 | 10:17 AM
  #10  
Barwick's Avatar
Thread Starter
SCCA Rookie
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
yeah but wouldn't it atomize better? I dunno..
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2004 | 10:20 AM
  #11  
$150FC's Avatar
Currently Winning
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Yeah, it'd atomize "better" in theory, but in practice there's not much of a point, as far as I know.

Also, to my knowledge, all 1600cc injectors will require modification of either the rail or the injector (or a new fuel rail). But it is not difficult to mod them.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 06:53 PM
  #12  
machinis's Avatar
Boricua
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Fernandina Beach, FL
Originally posted by Barwick
The NPR is why the topic even came up, I'm ditching that thing as soon as I possibly can.

Crappy, huh? I'll take that crappy NPR off your hands.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #13  
widebody2's Avatar
addicted to lounge
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 2
From: ny,LI
Max cooper's calculator: with a fuel pump 4 720s is good for 307 WHP at 85% injector duty
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 03:05 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Colorado!
you could run secondary injectors before the intake manifold.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 02:21 PM
  #15  
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
NASA geek
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
Just curious, your running a 60-1 wheel inside a T04E housing, or a 60 trim T04E?

~Mike..............
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 02:30 PM
  #16  
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
NASA geek
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
you could run secondary injectors before the intake manifold.

Band-Aid of an idea. This is for people too lazy or not knowledgable enough to do things propperly. injectos before your intake manifold is good for poor fuel distribution between runners ( these manifolds are designed as DRY manifolds and designed only to carry AIR), is good for fuel puddling, and is good for developing varnish on your throttle plates, and the entire inner surfaces in your manifold.

Run injectors in the stock locations (sizes between the primary and secondaries are more or less a prefference, as there is good and bad for different combos just as long as you run enough TOTAL fuel for your intended power level), or if you want to add more injectors, put them in the intake runners.

~Mike...............

Last edited by RacerXtreme7; Apr 8, 2004 at 02:43 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 02:40 PM
  #17  
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
NASA geek
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
The reason for an 80% injector duty cycle isn't for reserve fuel capability. You shouldn't run over 80% because your injector will get hot and FAIL. Injectors are not meant to be used as full duty. You shouldn't run excessive fuel pressure either, as this puts more of a load on your injectors also. The higher the pressure, the more work it takes to open the injector to fight against the fuel pressure keeping it closed. Again, duty cycles are kept lower then 100% simply to save the life of the injector, NOT for a margin to add more fuel if you need it.

~Mike.....................
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
bryancmatthews
Power FC Forum
14
Oct 5, 2015 08:49 PM
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
Sep 12, 2015 12:22 PM
Steven_McKinley
General Rotary Tech Support
12
Sep 5, 2015 10:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 PM.