Same boost levels, same charged air temps = different HP numbers?
Same boost levels, same charged air temps = different HP numbers?
Ok I've got a question for you turbo guys. I was talking to this guy at some company who's saying that they've got a turbo setup that "flows more air" yet produces 300hp at the same boost levels as stock on a '89-'91 TurboII motor. He's saying it's because it flows more air.
Now, I said "but the flow rates beyond the turbo outlet are all still the same as stock, so what does the flowrate out of the turbo matter if it's the same boost level?" He continued to swear that it made more power because it flows more air and whatever..
So my question is, is he right? I understand the whole firetruck hose vs garden hose concept, but if the stock turbo wasn't flowing enough air to begin with, then the boost levels would drop as airflow began to decrease along the way. Just because more air is available coming out of the turbo doesn't mean that all of that extra flow can reach the engine.
Now, I said "but the flow rates beyond the turbo outlet are all still the same as stock, so what does the flowrate out of the turbo matter if it's the same boost level?" He continued to swear that it made more power because it flows more air and whatever..
So my question is, is he right? I understand the whole firetruck hose vs garden hose concept, but if the stock turbo wasn't flowing enough air to begin with, then the boost levels would drop as airflow began to decrease along the way. Just because more air is available coming out of the turbo doesn't mean that all of that extra flow can reach the engine.
hmmm....
One turbo pushing 15 PSI with a certain volume of air passing through could make more power than another turbo pushing the same PSI and just flowing a smaller volume of air.
More Air = More Power (and more fuel demands)
A large turbo pushing 7 PSI and pushing through (for example) 200cc/s of air would make close to as much power as a smaller turbo pushing 15 PSI pushin 200cc/s of air.
(Just an example)
If you increase the Turbo's PSI it will pass more air, creating more power (to the extent of the size of the air intake). Subsequently if the Air Intake is opened up the turbo (at Max PSI) would actually be able to more effieciently pass air through faster and in larger volumes, creating more power. (And this must be countered with fuel.)
Blah...I think that is how it goes.
More Air = More Power (and more fuel demands)
A large turbo pushing 7 PSI and pushing through (for example) 200cc/s of air would make close to as much power as a smaller turbo pushing 15 PSI pushin 200cc/s of air.
(Just an example)
If you increase the Turbo's PSI it will pass more air, creating more power (to the extent of the size of the air intake). Subsequently if the Air Intake is opened up the turbo (at Max PSI) would actually be able to more effieciently pass air through faster and in larger volumes, creating more power. (And this must be countered with fuel.)
Blah...I think that is how it goes.
hmm.. see I figured that since the PSI was the same before the engine, and the flow rates between the turbo and the engine are still the same, the flow rate of the turbo wouldn't matter, but I guess not. Is it more a matter of how much pressure it can SUSTAIN through the entire intake system between the turbo and the engine?
Originally posted by Barwick
hmm.. see I figured that since the PSI was the same before the engine, and the flow rates between the turbo and the engine are still the same, the flow rate of the turbo wouldn't matter, but I guess not. Is it more a matter of how much pressure it can SUSTAIN through the entire intake system between the turbo and the engine?
hmm.. see I figured that since the PSI was the same before the engine, and the flow rates between the turbo and the engine are still the same, the flow rate of the turbo wouldn't matter, but I guess not. Is it more a matter of how much pressure it can SUSTAIN through the entire intake system between the turbo and the engine?
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Barwick
hmm.. see I figured that since the PSI was the same before the engine, and the flow rates between the turbo and the engine are still the same, the flow rate of the turbo wouldn't matter, but I guess not. Is it more a matter of how much pressure it can SUSTAIN through the entire intake system between the turbo and the engine?
hmm.. see I figured that since the PSI was the same before the engine, and the flow rates between the turbo and the engine are still the same, the flow rate of the turbo wouldn't matter, but I guess not. Is it more a matter of how much pressure it can SUSTAIN through the entire intake system between the turbo and the engine?
-Ted
basically yes.....your fuel needs are really based on the amount of cfm and oxygen, not psi of boost. If you bolt up a T78 and run 14psi of boost you'd need way more fuel than if you ran 14psi of boost on the stock twins because the cfm difference.
Look at it like this.......take the seq system for example, 12psi of boost before transition when your running one turbo is a whole different animal than 12psi after the transition when your running 2 turbos. Your still running 12psi but your making way more power. Now of course there are other factors, ect ect ect but I'm sure you get the idea. With no more boost your hp jumps 100rwhp in like 500rpms.
STEPHEN
Look at it like this.......take the seq system for example, 12psi of boost before transition when your running one turbo is a whole different animal than 12psi after the transition when your running 2 turbos. Your still running 12psi but your making way more power. Now of course there are other factors, ect ect ect but I'm sure you get the idea. With no more boost your hp jumps 100rwhp in like 500rpms.
STEPHEN
1JZ powered
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
From: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Originally posted by SPOautos
basically yes.....your fuel needs are really based on the amount of cfm and oxygen, not psi of boost. If you bolt up a T78 and run 14psi of boost you'd need way more fuel than if you ran 14psi of boost on the stock twins because the cfm difference.
Look at it like this.......take the seq system for example, 12psi of boost before transition when your running one turbo is a whole different animal than 12psi after the transition when your running 2 turbos. Your still running 12psi but your making way more power. Now of course there are other factors, ect ect ect but I'm sure you get the idea. With no more boost your hp jumps 100rwhp in like 500rpms.
STEPHEN
basically yes.....your fuel needs are really based on the amount of cfm and oxygen, not psi of boost. If you bolt up a T78 and run 14psi of boost you'd need way more fuel than if you ran 14psi of boost on the stock twins because the cfm difference.
Look at it like this.......take the seq system for example, 12psi of boost before transition when your running one turbo is a whole different animal than 12psi after the transition when your running 2 turbos. Your still running 12psi but your making way more power. Now of course there are other factors, ect ect ect but I'm sure you get the idea. With no more boost your hp jumps 100rwhp in like 500rpms.
STEPHEN
Originally posted by Barwick
so then would a turbo that makes 8 psi and flows 800 cfm be more likely to cause detonation than a turbo that makes 8 psi and flows 400 cfm?
so then would a turbo that makes 8 psi and flows 800 cfm be more likely to cause detonation than a turbo that makes 8 psi and flows 400 cfm?
-Ted
Originally posted by peejay
Don't forget the exhaust restriction factor. A small turbo has to spin faster to make the same PSI/CFM, so the turbine side will be more restrictive. (As i gather
)
Don't forget the exhaust restriction factor. A small turbo has to spin faster to make the same PSI/CFM, so the turbine side will be more restrictive. (As i gather
)
The turbine side of the turbo would be the factor in this case. The less restrictive turbine will allow less exhaust gasses to be trapped into the intake cycle, allowing the enigine to ingest a fresher intake mixture.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM



)



