Picture Request: Injector Dynamics installed
#77
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (8)
Well recommended would be the ID725's primaries and ID2000's secondaries so your always ready for an upgrade if needed. But it sounds like your trying to save. So since your getting the aeromotive 340 which still flows at high psi, I would suggest the ID850 primaries with ID1000 secondaries with 50 PSi base fuel pressure. That should supply enough fuel for your needs and you can always crank it up to 60 PSi if needed but I don't think you will. The newer injectors don't mind the higher duty cycles either.
However, if you think you will every change to a bigger turbo, I still suggest the ID2000 combo so you won't have to mess with it again.
thewird
However, if you think you will every change to a bigger turbo, I still suggest the ID2000 combo so you won't have to mess with it again.
thewird
#83
35r 13b first gen
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Richland Center WI
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 4barrel throttle body and currently have no injectors was trying to figure out which would be the best combo also... I am also running a gt35r and hoping for about 500rwhp. I will probably be upgrading my walbro 255 to a 400 and also using an aeromotive fpr. i was thinking about going with the sprint RE Haltech that C. Ludwig suggested I use. will this work fine with IDs any suggestions welcome...
#84
I have a 4barrel throttle body and currently have no injectors was trying to figure out which would be the best combo also... I am also running a gt35r and hoping for about 500rwhp. I will probably be upgrading my walbro 255 to a 400 and also using an aeromotive fpr. i was thinking about going with the sprint RE Haltech that C. Ludwig suggested I use. will this work fine with IDs any suggestions welcome...
Do you have 8 injector slots on this setup? You know we are a stocking dealer for injector dynamics right? Got several thousand dollars worth of these in stock...
#85
35r 13b first gen
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Richland Center WI
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes i know that That is where i originally saw them and why i want to go with them.. I know you have legit stuff. Just put this on here opposed to asking you bc I figured it might help out some others with similar setups.. also do you know if these will work well with the sprint RE? Thanks
#90
I've got three customers running that exact same setup, stock 550 primaries, in the stock rail, and top feed secondary rail with Id2000s. I've also run this setup a few times on our TD61 system, I can supply a good PFC base map with purchase of injectors too...
#93
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (24)
Hey guys, I have a 500R from Aspec, plans to have around 450-500hp. What would be the best combo as I only have 4 fuel injector ports with CJ fuel system. (2x ID1k and 2x ID2k ?)
Or am I ok with 725s and 2000s? I want the smoothest idle if possible. Thanks!
-AzEKnightz
Or am I ok with 725s and 2000s? I want the smoothest idle if possible. Thanks!
-AzEKnightz
#94
Hey guys, I have a 500R from Aspec, plans to have around 450-500hp. What would be the best combo as I only have 4 fuel injector ports with CJ fuel system. (2x ID1k and 2x ID2k ?)
Or am I ok with 725s and 2000s? I want the smoothest idle if possible. Thanks!
-AzEKnightz
Or am I ok with 725s and 2000s? I want the smoothest idle if possible. Thanks!
-AzEKnightz
Either will work for smooth idle. I would just stick with 725/2000s for the smoothest idle however, especially since you only want 450/500rwhp..
#95
4th string e-armchair QB
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Bay, Ontario
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depending on your ECU, you may be better off with the 1000's for transition tuning. I know with my Microtech, transition tuning sucks, and although I never tried the 725's, the 1000's gave a much smoother transition combined with my bosch 1680 secondaries vs. the 550 stockers. Idle wasn't that bad either.
#97
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
I would stick with 725's on primaries for PFC so you don't have to use negative lag. Some have suggested that you can run 1000's with correct lag times, but I've yet to see it and others just say use negative, which is BADDD!!! Transition shouldn't be an issue as the 2000's are incredibly linear down at lower pulsewidths, so there shouldn't be stumbles like trying to bring on the older 1680's.
#98
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (24)
I would stick with 725's on primaries for PFC so you don't have to use negative lag. Some have suggested that you can run 1000's with correct lag times, but I've yet to see it and others just say use negative, which is BADDD!!! Transition shouldn't be an issue as the 2000's are incredibly linear down at lower pulsewidths, so there shouldn't be stumbles like trying to bring on the older 1680's.
-AzEKnightz
#99
Hey guys, I have a 500R from Aspec, plans to have around 450-500hp. What would be the best combo as I only have 4 fuel injector ports with CJ fuel system. (2x ID1k and 2x ID2k ?)
Or am I ok with 725s and 2000s? I want the smoothest idle if possible. Thanks!
-AzEKnightz
Or am I ok with 725s and 2000s? I want the smoothest idle if possible. Thanks!
-AzEKnightz